Re: Physicists and Laws.

On Dec 29 2008, 1:24 am, socratus <israel...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 29, 7:05 am, RAM <RAMather...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 28, 10:56 pm, socratus <israel...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Physicists and Laws.

Physicists do not dictate to Nature their laws.
Laws of nature are reality, which exists independently
from the researcher. The Nature cannot be arranged so
strange, as the physicists think of it. Their thoughts
are so strange, that they offer paradoxical ideas.Einstein wrote:

“ In the Science the man has freedom to solve
 well made crossword. ”
In this crossword physicists don’t know what Light quanta,
Electron, Energy are.
#
“ It is important to realize that in physics today,
we have no knowledge of what energy is.
We do not have a picture that energy comes in little
blobs of a definite amount. ”  / Feynman. 1987/  . . . .
#
"The electron that can be told is not the true electron."
/ David Harrison /
#
Etc.
And instead to understand what Light quanta, Electron,
Energy are, they try to add to the crossword of Universe
new cells and fill them with new abstract models.
For example;
on horizontal –  dark matter
(The Dark Matter  is another official dogma
 of our astronomy. /V. H. Vergon/)
and on vertical –  string theory
( We don't know what we are  talking about"
 / Nobel laureate David Gross referring to the  current state
of string theory./)
Or on horizontal – quark,
and on vertical - Higgs boson or Higgs mechanism.
Etc.
This is reason that I wrote:

The more I study the more I know.
The more I know the more ideas I have.
The more ideas I have the more they abstract.
The more they abstract the less I know the truth.

And as a result conclusion from some article:
" One of the best kept secrets of science is
that physicists have lost their grip on reality."
========= .

I prefer to trust their empirical expertise and judgment than yours.
HTH

RAM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

=========================================
“ their empirical expertise “ . . .says that when electron  interacts
 with vacuum  all its parameters changes and become infinite .
Is it possible ? No. Here is one of physical problem.

What can "electron interacts with vacuum " possibly mean?

Do the people who speak your native language not take you seriously?
Perhaps there is a reason for that.

Kermit

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability?
    ... >Energy theory that doesn't require Bohr version of stability. ... >the following and it fascinates me on how many physicists believe it. ... With one electron and one proton, ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Zero Point Electron Orbit Stability?
    ... >Energy theory that doesn't require Bohr version of stability. ... >the following and it fascinates me on how many physicists believe it. ... With one electron and one proton, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: please help my confusion about particles and irreps.
    ... > difference between QFT applications to solids and QED. ... The difference is that an electron in a solid *really* can ... the renormalization describes a *real* physical ... But infinity is a relative term, at least for physicists. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Uncertainty Principle
    ... imprecision in the measurement of the position q of a moving electron to the ... Archibald Wheeler and Hubert Zurek, in Quantum Theory and Measurement, ... He wonders whether physical laws and physical constants evolve, ... It's quite obvious that what physicists mental hangup is ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How big is the electron?
    ... since you know so many physicists let me ask you some things. ... >> In quantum electrodynamics the bare electron is a point particle. ... >> I'm hoping you can give me some specifics to compare to. ...
    (sci.physics)