Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:36:38 GMT
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:54:10 -0800, Earle Jones
<earle.jones@xxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
In article <ahlil4l7jt9devqjjkeonj3c6mqeh8dm10@xxxxxxx>,
Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:35:04 -0800 (PST), Ray Martinez
<pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
Dr. Scott was an expert in at least 8 dead Biblical languages. He
contributed most to this progamme. Since he also refuted the Theory of
Evolution in the course of said programme
Gene 'expletive deleted' Scott was a dishonest con artist. A fraud who
claimed educational qualifications he didn't have. A liar who duped
money out of people who could ill afford it. An evil man who preyed on
the mentally weak. A philanderer, a crook, a charlatan - just out to
line his pockets at the expense of others. Corrupt to the core. A foul
loud-mouthed trickster who finally, due to his own abject stupidity,
died of an illness that most would survive unscathed. The world became
a much better place when he died.
Now Dishonest Ray. If you really think that is libel then here I am,
ready and waiting for your legal action.
BTW, if I've missed anything I'm sure some others will pitch in and I
can add their damnations to mine.
*
Bob: Only one error that I could find. Scott claimed to have a PhD in
Education from Stanford University. I believe that is true.
His claim, oft repeated in the past by Dishonest Ray, was that he was
awarded a unique PhD - a 'multi-discipline PhD' which had never been
issued by Stanford before or since.
[quote]
I emailed Stanford on the topic and they told me that the degree
described does not exist now and has never existed in the past. Gene
Scott did indeed receive a doctorate in the philosophy of education
from Stanford, but the claims that the degree was "cross-departmental
in Philosophy and Religion" and "granted by the University itself and
not by any department which means it was the hardest degree to earn
and the last one(s) handed-out at graduation" are simply false. To be
fair, I don't know if Scott actually said he'd received this special
degree, or if Ray merely claimed it on his behalf.
[end quote]
Quote taken from message ID
7a6f3bac-ef67-4161-8a8a-6d20b52c7c67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
earle (also from Stanford)
--
Bob.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
- References:
- Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Devils Advocaat
- Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Devils Advocaat
- Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Ray Martinez
- A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- From: Earle Jones
- Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- Prev by Date: Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
- Next by Date: Re: Morals vs. Ethics
- Previous by thread: Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
- Next by thread: Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading