Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- From: Harry K <turnkey4099@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:28:15 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 16, 8:08 am, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 16, 3:24 pm, wf3h <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 16, 9:19 am, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Many evolutionists, claim thet evolution is not a theory of
abiogenesis.
Evolution is a theory of descent with modification.
Ergo: Abiogenisis is simply a crosshair.
If descent with modification is fact, then the crosshair is simply a
matter of logistics.
Thus. in the sequence A -> B -> C
I wish to focus my crosshair on A.
Shoot, and publish your results.
I am a fond reader of published results.
it is no more necessary that evolution know the origin of life than it
is for chemistry to know the origin of atoms.
Thats like my math pro "claiming" that, I don't need to know about
primes.
Sorry, but I wanna know.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No you don't or you would ahve learned by now that your delusions are
false.
Harry K
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- From: spintronic
- Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- References:
- Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- From: spintronic
- Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- From: wf3h
- Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- From: spintronic
- Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- Prev by Date: Re: The ***
- Next by Date: Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
- Index(es):