Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008

From: Cheezits <Cheezits32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:55:21 GMT

tension_on_the_wire <tension_at_home@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[etc.]

Being relatively new here in this group, I have to ask whether this
means that you are nominating PEW for a Chez Watt, or rather are you
nominating the numerous respondents to their survey?

[etc.]

I think that what is being nominated is the statement itself.

Sue
--
"It's not smart or correct, but it's one of the things that
make us what we are." - Red Green

.

References:
- Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
  - From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
  - From: tension_on_the_wire

Prev by Date: Re: 1.23 percent
Next by Date: Re: The evolving story of evolution
Previous by thread: Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
Next by thread: Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Honorary POTM Nomination (Was: Re: External Chez Watt)
... > nominating a statement from outside t.o, ... >> Intelligent Design hides behind an official position that it does ... >> all of its advocates believe that the Designer is God. ... Actually instead of seconding your Chez Watt, ...
(talk.origins)
Re: Ealine Morgan
... Op 25-07-2007 17:59, in artikel ... Pathetic savanna fools. ... I'd be nominating you for a Chez Watt right now, ...
(sci.anthropology.paleo)
Re: Ealine Morgan
... Pathetic savanna fools. ... I'd be nominating you for a Chez Watt right now, ... going from telling other people not to use _ad hominem_ to using it ...
(sci.anthropology.paleo)