talk.origins

• Thread Index

---

• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Flagellum Fraud: The ID movements icon is fake
  • From: eroot
• Re: Which evolutionists in the forum has denied their practical
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: eroot
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: eroot
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: eroot
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Wombat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: [M]adman
• Pagano flips out, film at 11
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Flagellum Fraud: The ID movements icon is fake
  • From: RAM
• Re: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: dhacat
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: RAM
• Re: Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: As if the neoDarwinian fairy tale weren't enough; now the atheists
  • From: Steven L.
• Stockwell still offering hot air and no facts and no arguments
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Rabbit
• Re: Flagellum Fraud: The ID movements icon is fake
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Rabbit
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Rabbit
• Re: OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: Dr.GH
• Stockwell returns with hot air but doesn't save Flank
  • From: T Pagano
• Note to Harshman
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Anthony Pagano embraces evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Anthony Pagano embraces evolution
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Boikat
• Flagellum Fraud: The ID movements icon is fake
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: slothrop
• Re: As if the neoDarwinian fairy tale weren't enough; now the
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Iain
• Re: As if the neoDarwinian fairy tale weren't enough; now the
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Rolf is delusional if he thinks the Luria-Delbr
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: As if the neoDarwinian fairy tale weren't enough; now the
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: JennyB
• Re: OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Change of handle notice
  • From: reddfrogg
• As if the neoDarwinian fairy tale weren't enough; now the atheists propagate the Dover fairy tale
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: Rolf is delusional if he thinks the Luria-Delbr
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: miascute
• Re: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: reddfrogg
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: miascute
• Rolf is delusional if he thinks the Luria-Delbrück experiment hurts Ray or helps neoDarwinism
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Which evolutionists in the forum has denied their practical
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: Ritsjoena
• Which evolutionists in the forum has denied their practical atheism? Anyone...Anyone...
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: slothrop
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: slothrop
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Note to Ray M.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: slothrop
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Note to Ray M.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: Wombat
• Note to Ray M.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• More problems ahead for Ray in 2009!
  • From: Rolf
• Re: OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: Ritsjoena
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: special Darwin issue of The Lancet
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: OT: Religion and self control
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ron O
• Re: special Darwin issue of The Lancet
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: JPG
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Religion and self control
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Vend
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• OT: Sir Terry Pratchett
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: RAM
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• OT: Religion and self control
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: TomS
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: Boikat
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: TomS
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: RAM
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: rnorman
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Stuart
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Stuart
• Chez Watt
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: TomS
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: Boikat
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Shane
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Shane
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: William Morse
• Re: special Darwin issue of The Lancet
  • From: TomS
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Reply to a Creationist
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: Desertphile
• special Darwin issue of The Lancet
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is not
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: Shane
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: TomS
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: AC
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: AC
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: AC
• Re: Undeniable Martian Haversian canal clearly shown on NASA
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: TomS
• OT: israeli nuclear spy busted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: all die; oh, the embarrassment re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Giaccomo
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is not
  • From: Allen
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: Allen
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: TomS
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Allen
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Allen
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Allen
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Max
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: RAM
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: all die; oh, the embarrassment re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Occidental
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Boikat
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Giaccomo
• Re: Reply to a Creationist
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: all die; oh, the embarrassment re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Augray
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Iain
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Iain
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: slothrop
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: [M]adman
• Reply to a Creationist
  • From: R Brown
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Undeniable Martian Haversian canal clearly shown on NASA micrograph
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Rabbit
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: all die; oh, the embarrassment re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Max
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Max
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Undeniable osteons in a Mars fossil bone; That's why NASA never
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• OT: Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Max
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Undeniable Martian Haversian canal clearly shown on NASA
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: miascute
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: miascute
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: eroot
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: eroot
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to
  • From: Ron O
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Vend
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: TomS
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: Guido
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Iain
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ymir
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Wombat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: rnorman
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to others;
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Hamas, the world's gullibility, and the theory of evolution
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is not
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is not
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Bob Berger
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is not
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Ymir
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: TomS
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to others; Ron O implies that this makes IC valueless
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: TomS
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: B.F Washington
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: giannileonefernando
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: dusting the greensward re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ye Old One
• A true description of Gene Scott. was Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: RAM
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: TomS
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Frank J
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: halfstop
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: RAM
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• How utterly scientific of you guys! {and Ray is Correct btw}
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: TomS
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Switch89
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Rabbit
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: martin
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: TomS
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: TomS
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Iain
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: jcon
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: TomS
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: TomS
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: socratus
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: RAM
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ymir
• Re: dusting the greensward re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: TomS
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: dusting the greensward re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Is Ray Martinez Velikovsky reborn?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: slothrop
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Rolf
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: AC
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Max
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Iain
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Was the Was the Was ...
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: milla
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Iain
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: TomS
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: milla
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Max
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: jcon
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is not
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Desertphile
• Morals vs. Ethics
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Steve O
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: martin
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: eroot
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: eroot
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: TomS
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: TomS
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Boikat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Vend
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: Ron O
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Ron O
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: Guido
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Ron O
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Switch89
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Cubist
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: Toddie Simians
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is
  • From: Toddie Simians
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: socratus
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Switch89
• Re: dusting the greensward re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: dusting the greensward re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: dusting the greensward re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Zaius
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: motlan73
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: motlan73
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Dick C
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: RAM
• Physicists and Laws.
  • From: socratus
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Bodega
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Susan S
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Susan S
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: TomS
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Susan S
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Switch89
• In the News: Origin of Darwin's theory in dispute
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: milla
• Commentary: The ability to see what is there, and to see what is not
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: milla
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Occidental
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: milla
• Data Compression Routine for Mice
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to
  • From: Ron O
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Inez
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Ron O believes that the fuzziness of the label "IC" stops the
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: dusting the greensward re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Vend
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: supreme . beanxxx
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth and can decide the truth or falsity of theories
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Science be damned!
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to others;
  • From: TomS
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to others;
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Switch89
• Re: Science be damned!
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to others;
  • From: TomS
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: TomS
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to others;
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Dover proved that ID is Creationism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to
  • From: RAM
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Ron O believes that the fuzziness of the label "IC" stops the
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: murdock
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: heekster
• Re: catholic synod on the word of god
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: RAM
• Re: Ron O believes that the fuzziness of the label "IC" stops the
  • From: TomS
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: chibiabos
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Inez
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Timothy
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Ron O believes that the fuzziness of the label "IC" stops the
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: Ron O
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Timothy
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: JohnN
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Mark Evans
• Einstein never conducted a single test of GR; he left it to others; Ron O implies that this makes IC valueless
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Ron O believes that the fuzziness of the label "IC" stops the "IC" juggernaut
  • From: T Pagano
• Ron O opines that a Civil US Court has authority over the Truth and can decide the truth or falsity of theories
  • From: T Pagano
• OT: Africa needs God
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: wf3h
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Vend
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: eroot
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: rnorman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Allen
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: food chain descent re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I'd like to share one of my Christmas presents with TO regulars
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Ron O
• Re: food chain descent re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: I'd like to share one of my Christmas presents with TO regulars
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Boikat
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Evolution of God in the Bible
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Allen
• Re: counting on it re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: wf3h
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Frank J
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I'd like to share one of my Christmas presents with TO regulars
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Allen
• Re: samuel huntington is dead
  • From: Frank J
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: TomS
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: wf3h
• samuel huntington is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Rolf
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ron O
• Michael Behe's Argument against Indirect Pathways to Irreducible
  • From: Switch89
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I'd like to share one of my Christmas presents with TO regulars
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: Rolf
• Re: I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: What should humans eat?
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: macaddicted
• I would like to disprove that notion with proof please
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Bodega
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• What should humans eat?
  • From: milla
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: rmj
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: rmj
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: rmj
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Boikat
• Re: literacy re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Boikat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: B.F Washington
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: B.F Washington
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: marks542004
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Thank's to a discovery
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: A really good movie
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• A really good movie
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Science be damned!
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Thank's to a discovery
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: rnorman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: Obama's Hope for Humanity
  • From: Joseph Humming
• Re: Obama's Hope for Humanity
  • From: Joseph Humming
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I'd like to share one of my Christmas presents with TO regulars
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Bob Berger
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: food chain descent re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Economics Question
  • From: Sleepalot
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: counting on it re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: GoldLions
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Boikat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Obama's Hope for Humanity
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: heekster
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: rnorman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Obama's Hope for Humanity
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: heekster
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: TomS
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Wrong Again Tony
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Pagano runs and hides again
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The Evolution of God in the Bible
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Bob Casanova
• The Evolution of God in the Bible
  • From: heekster
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Human Evolution Questions
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: heekster
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: eerok
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: Mike Painter
• For Devil Advocaat's sake Thompson remains silent
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: eroot
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: eroot
• Human Evolution Questions
  • From: martin
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: eroot
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: eroot
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: heekster
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: eroot
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: eroot
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: TomS
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: B.F Washington
• Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life
  • From: B.F Washington
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Obama's Hope for Humanity
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: TomS
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: TomS
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: eroot
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Vend
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Allen
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Frank J
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Rolf
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The emperor's new clothes
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: toarchive and google search
  • From: heekster
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: heekster
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Mars rover found new Haversian canals of fossil bone
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Tony Seems Unable To Accept The Evidence
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: chris thompson
• The emperor's new clothes
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: heekster
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Inez
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Jama
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: TomS
• Thompson decides whether we address Devil Advocaat's claim with the details or not
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: TomS
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: TomS
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Wrong Again Tony
  • From: eroot
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: eroot
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Frank J
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: DJT
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: DJT
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Frank J
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: DJT
• Re: Obama's Hope for Humanity
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: DJT
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: TomS
• Obama's Hope for Humanity
  • From: Joseph Humming
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: The smell of victory without even breaking a sweat---Devil's Advocaat slinks back in terror like Harshman
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: poland
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Bob Casanova
• I'd like to share one of my Christmas presents with TO regulars
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: toarchive and google search
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: g@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Wrong Again Tony
  • From: Boikat
• Re: So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Boikat
• Wrong Again Tony
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• The smell of victory without even breaking a sweat---Devil's Advocaat slinks back in terror like Harshman
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• So Far Devil's Advocate has turned tail and run....
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ymir
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: TomS
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Robert Camp
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Dick C
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Inez
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Common Descent is both vacuous and trivial
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Allen
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ron O
• Re: toarchive and google search
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: toarchive and google search
  • From: rossum
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Rolf
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Vend
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Rolf
• toarchive and google search
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Beyond Baffled (was Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge)
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Boikat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: bimms
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: bimms
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: heekster
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Max
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Boikat
• Our sunshine girl of the web Darya Gunchenko has a new video out. The
  • From: eggo33
• Re: Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: [M]adman
• Emma Wedgwood Darwin's cookbook
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: heekster
• Basic query re cells and dna and behaviour
  • From: KiwiBrian
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: heekster
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Humans as apes on Wikipedia
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Benevolent Deity creates 100+ kinds of tuberculosis
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: Boikat
• Re: My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: very like a weasel re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: heekster
• My poor misguided/misinformed friends
  • From: cbreeze9
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: heekster
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: heekster
• Words of wisdom for Ray
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: heekster
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: heekster
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: heekster
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: heekster
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: TomS
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Basic Greek alpha prefix issue
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: literacy re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: bimms
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: willow
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Beyond Baffled (was Desertphile's Definitive Creationism
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: willow
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Beyond Baffled (was Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Boikat
• Re: very like a weasel re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Merry Christmas!
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: chris thompson
• Merry Christmas!
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Vend
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Commentary: Evolution Theory Is Not Scientific
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: [M]adman
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Bodega
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Det. Randy Cowan #1195, Det. Randall Cowan #1195, Randy Cowan,
  • From: jklewe
• Re: Spam, Spam, Spam, Eggs, and Spam
  • From: Susan S
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: When is talkorigins.org going to reappear?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: When is talkorigins.org going to reappear?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Moist Lipwig
• Re: A 24 Hour Los Angeles Emergency Locksmith 1-877-364-5264
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Millions of scarlet red blood cells were squeezed out from a
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: When is talkorigins.org going to reappear?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Pagano is both vacuous and trivial
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: hersheyh
• Pagano huffs and bluffs and signifies nothing
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Pagano is both vacuous and trivial
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: another reason to celebrate on December 25th
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: TomS
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: RAM
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Uriel
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: imaginary numbers re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Millions of scarlet red blood cells were squeezed out from a
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: TomS
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Millions of scarlet red blood cells were squeezed out from a
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: papoose-crows-too-soon re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: TomS
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: heekster
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: papoose-crows-too-soon re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: heekster
• Re: Basic Greek alpha prefix issue
  • From: DJT
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: heekster
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: True origins?
  • From: John Collins
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because
  • From: TomS
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: DJT
• Re: True origins?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: slothrop
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Millions of scarlet red blood cells were squeezed out from a
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: alextangent
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: another reason to celebrate on December 25th
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Frank J
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: rnorman
• another reason to celebrate on December 25th
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because
  • From: Ye Old One
• Priest 'ruins Christmas' for kids
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: RAM
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: wf3h
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: rossum
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: True origins?
  • From: John Collins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: eroot
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Max
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Allen
• Re: Millions of scarlet red blood cells were squeezed out from a
  • From: Boikat
• Millions of scarlet red blood cells were squeezed out from a
  • From: fossilid
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: dali_70
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: dali_70
• Chez watt Re: Chez watt Re: Kabbalah
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Devil's Advocaat spelling corrected (lol)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Chez watt Re: Kabbalah
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: imaginary numbers re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: When is talkorigins.org going to reappear?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Basic Greek alpha prefix issue
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Earle Jones
• Chez watt Re: Kabbalah
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Dr.GH
• Basic Greek alpha prefix issue
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: When is talkorigins.org going to reappear?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Boikat
• Re: SPAM
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Boikat
• Re: SPAM
  • From: heekster
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: SPAM
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: RAM
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Roger Coppock
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• When is talkorigins.org going to reappear?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Boikat
• Re: SPAM
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Spam, Spam, Spam, Eggs, and Spam
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: heekster
• Re: Spam, Spam, Spam, Eggs, and Spam
  • From: heekster
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Common Descent is both vacuous and trivial
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Boikat
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed-- Only God
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: TomS
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: heekster
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Devil's Advocate's bluff is called
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Common Descent is both vacuous and trivial
  • From: wf3h
• Tony is both vacuous and trivial
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: wf3h
• Common Descent is both vacuous and trivial
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: SkyEyes
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Bill
• Re: SPAM
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Kabbalah
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Allen
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: heekster
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: Allen
• see for yourself. (if you dare)
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: wf3h
• Come on Down! You are the next contestant on: The Truth is right!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: heekster
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Boikat
• Re: SPAM
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SPAM
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Boikat
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: heekster
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: murdock
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: mike3
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: mike3
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: mike3
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: www.talkorigins.org
  • From: NilsMozart
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Spam, Spam, Spam, Eggs, and Spam
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Spam, Spam, Spam, Eggs, and Spam
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: TomS
• Desertphile's Definitive Creationism Challenge
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Bill
• Re: A 24 Hour Los Angeles Emergency Locksmith 1-877-364-5264
  • From: SkyEyes
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: RAM
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Study: Men Outnumbered Women in Ancient African Exodus 60,000 Years
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: eroot
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: eroot
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Missy
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: Desertphile
• Does anyone know anything about this ???
  • From: Missy
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: poland
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Boikat
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Woland
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Boikat
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: wf3h
• Richard Dawkins on 'Have Your Say' 1
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: eroot
• Re: SPAM
  • From: Boikat
• SPAM
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bill Hudson
• A 24 Hour Los Angeles Emergency Locksmith 1-877-364-5264
  • From: moving companies
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: wf3h
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's Classification Scheme contradict Darwinism?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: wf3h
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Study: Men Outnumbered Women in Ancient African Exodus 60,000 Years
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Romania Removes Theory of Evolution from School Curriculum [long]
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: Allen
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: Allen
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Why does the theory of Common Descent conjoined to Linnaeus's Classification Scheme contradict Darwinism?
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Red blood cell remains streamed out of a Carboniferous human
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: dali_70
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: True origins?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: JPG
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: eroot
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Vend
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: Reentrant
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: True origins?
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• UK: Third of teachers want Creationism
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Yet another Harun Yahya interview
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: milla
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: wf3h
• Study: Men Outnumbered Women in Ancient African Exodus 60,000 Years
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: TomS
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: TomS
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Was the moon ever close enough to pull on the mantle?
  • From: miascute
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Obama names more scientists
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Muslim Nativity at Washington State Capitol
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: TomS
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: heekster
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: TomS
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: heekster
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Boikat
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: heekster
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: heekster
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: www.talkorigins.org
  • From: Shane
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: heekster
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: heekster
• Re: Pregnant Mice
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: AC
• Re: www.talkorigins.org
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: alextangent
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: poland
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Random thread title change
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Pretty please with sugar on it?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Ron O
• www.talkorigins.org
  • From: NilsMozart
• xmass card trick
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Iain
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Make Money Online
  • From: lizzyjo1@xxxxxxxx
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: hersheyh
• Repost of a Conundrum
  • From: Bill
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: slothrop
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: TomS
• Re: In Empirical Science a "conceivable" or "plausible" pathway to IC
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Red blood cell remains streamed out of a Carboniferous human
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: AC
• Re: Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: geoproc
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Wombat
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Can a RAT turn into a CAT?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Hershey ends up proving Adman's point
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: congoq
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: congoq
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: congoq
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: urillan
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: What lies hath Madman Wrought!
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Woland
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version
  • From: TomS
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: congoq
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version
  • From: congoq
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version
  • From: congoq
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version
  • From: congoq
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Iain
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Dwib
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: congoq
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: JC
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Dwib
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Max
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Dewey Henize
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: In Empirical Science a "conceivable" or "plausible" pathway to IC
  • From: eroot
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: RAM
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: RAM
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: urillan
• Epigenetics of Evolution of Insect Wings
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Allen
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Wombat
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: eroot
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: eroot
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: TomS
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: eroot
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Iain
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Behe didn't just contribute to the modern ID movement hs started
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Red blood cell remains streamed out of a Carboniferous human
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: True origins?
  • From: John Collins
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Red blood cell remains streamed out of a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: fossilid
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: wf3h
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: An apology
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: George
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: socratus
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Wombat
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Just when i thought i had read it all along comes..
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: God and Photon.
  • From: geoproc
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Locksmith Los Angeles, CA Emergency Locksmith Service 1-877-364-5264
  • From: moving companies
• God and Photon.
  • From: socratus
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: True origins?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: RAM
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: William Morse
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Lee Jay
• Tony agrees that he is clueless
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Random thread title change
  • From: heekster
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: William Morse
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What hath God Wrought!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: heekster
• Re: Obama names more scientists
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• What hath God Wrought!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Boikat
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: chris thompson
• ! Scientific proof: --No natural selection needed--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: heekster
• Re: this should make adman happy
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: heekster
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Behe didn't just contribute to the modern ID movement hs started
  • From: geoproc
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Shane
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: heekster
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: heekster
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Yawn
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: heekster
• Random thread title change
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Pretty please with sugar on it?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• True origins?
  • From: heekster
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: heekster
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Shane
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Please don't flame on talk.origin
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: heekster
• Re: As many times as Harshman has been hammered it is no wonder
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Behe didn't just contribute to the modern ID movement hs started
  • From: wf3h
• As many times as Harshman has been hammered it is no wonder things aren't fun for him
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Shane
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Behe didn't just contribute to the modern ID movement hs started it
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: rnorman
• Re: In the News: Biola honours Philip Johnson
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Bill
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: wf3h
• Harshman agrees Iain argued from ignorance and Harshman eludes to the "Patchwork" solution to IC
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: rnorman
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was
  • From: wf3h
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Harshman doesn't seem to understand that natural processes are
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Uriel
• Re: In Empirical Science a "conceivable" or "plausible" pathway to IC
  • From: wf3h
• Re: In Empirical Science a "conceivable" or "plausible" pathway to IC
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Shane
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Harshman doesn't seem to understand that natural processes are continuous and sequential in nature
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was Jacob)
  • From: Allen
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was Jacob)
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Boikat
• In Empirical Science a "conceivable" or "plausible" pathway to IC isn't good enough
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• The first Darwin evolutionist was a Christian (his name was Jacob)
  • From: Elijahovah
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Woland
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Allen
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: wf3h
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Stuart
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Stuart
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: JTEM
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Faux_Pseudo
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Iain
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Stuart
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Frank J
• Re: chez watt Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: eroot
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Allen
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Big Coverup
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: eroot
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Supresession of the evidence
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Boikat
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Boikat
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Harry K
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Supresession of the evidence
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Steven L.
• The Big Coverup
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: rnorman
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Hypothetical questions for anti-evolutionists
  • From: Frank J
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Frank J
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Frank J
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Spinny, adman, Ray and Pagano: Nando need your help
  • From: Ron O
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: 9 months?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Kleuskes & Moos
• Re: chez watt Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Allen
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: About time
  • From: TomS
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Frank J
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Allen
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Frank J
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Frank J
• Holdren will advise Obama on technology
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• 9 months?
  • From: Jama
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Tony isn't even fun any more
  • From: Ron O
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Rolf
• Re: News: Cornell researcher deciphers the meaning within bird
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Wombat
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Iain
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: William Morse
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Woland
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Bob Berger
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: heekster
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: poland
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: heekster
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: heekster
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Woland
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: William Morse
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Shane
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Hello, you must be going.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Boikat
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: wf3h
• Re: evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: Woland
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Boikat
• evolutionists are evil, creationists are good
  • From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: How Dishonest can Madman get?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Woland
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: murdock
• Re: Can you add and subtract?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Darwin hated Science
  • From: wf3h
• Can you add and subtract?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: wf3h
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: TomS
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Boikat
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• News: Breast cancer gene-free baby due.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: How Dishonest
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Jim Willemin
• News: Cornell researcher deciphers the meaning within bird communication.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Alien Faces
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Stuart
• How Dishonest
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Alien Faces
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• News: Origin Of Life On Earth: Simple Fusion To Jump-start Evolution.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Darwin hated Science
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• News: Lemur virus gives clues to evolution of HIV
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: fossilid
• News: Imitating Plant Evolution Proves Fruitful.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Woland
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: John Harshman
• Tony isn't even fun any more
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Ron O
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Ron O
• The True Side of DARWIN
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: heekster
• Re: Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Boikat
• January 2009 Scientific American
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: heekster
• Charles Darwin believed in INBREEDING
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: heekster
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Dick C
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: wf3h
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Iain
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Bill
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: Boikat
• Not only is it "only" a theory; Darwinism is only a false theory
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Boikat
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Caranx latus
• Is Harshman is a glutton for punishment?
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Bill
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: TomS
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Timeline for human evolution
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Frank J
• Re: chez watt Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Burgess Shale college project
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The real WF3H
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Prime's
  • From: rossum
• Re: The real Madman - Pathetic Troll.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Timeline for human evolution
  • From: Bill
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Iain
• Re: LDS re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: this should make adman happy
  • From: Stuart
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Please don't flame on talk.origin
  • From: heekster
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Cubist
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: TomS
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: TomS
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: In the News: Biola honours Philip Johnson
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: heekster
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: heekster
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: heekster
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: In the News: Biola honours Philip Johnson
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: eroot
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Frank J
• Obama names more scientists
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Desertphile
• Creationist hatred (Re: Chez Watt! Was Re: The Vagina_
  • From: Desertphile
• Burgess Shale college project
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• chez watt Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Darwin has been dead some time now...
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: In the News: Biola honours Philip Johnson
  • From: eroot
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Prime's
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Prime's
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Darwin has been dead some time now...
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Darwin has been dead some time now...
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Wombat
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: GoldLions
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: TomS
• In other news...
  • From: Boikat
• Re: About time
  • From: TomS
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: TomS
• Re: Please don't flame on talk.origin
  • From: wf3h
• Re: In the News: Biola honours Philip Johnson
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The real WF3H
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The real WF3H
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The real Madman - Pathetic Troll.
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Allen
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: louis14
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Dick C
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: In the News: Biola honours Philip Johnson
  • From: Ron O
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Frank J
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Darwin has been dead some time now...
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Frank J
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The real Madman - Pathetic Troll.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Ron O
• "Darwinism" is only a theory
  • From: Frank J
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Please don't flame on talk.origin
  • From: Vend
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Shane
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Shane
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Wombat
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Darwin has been dead some time now...
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Wombat
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Iain
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Shane
• In the News: Biola honours Philip Johnson
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Susan S
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Shane
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Shane
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Boikat
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Prime's
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: Three monkeys
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: chris thompson
• Three monkeys
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: hersheyh
• T.O. Regulars [your opinion wanted]
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• The real WF3H
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Timothy
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• this should make adman happy
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Prime's
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: wf3h
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: wf3h
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: Boikat
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Boikat
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Uriel
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Iain confuses Behe's test for IC with a claim about historical
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Dick C
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: William Morse
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: wf3h
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: wf3h
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: William Morse
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Shane
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: heekster
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Uriel
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: heekster
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: John McKendry
• are creationists getting weirder?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: heekster
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: heekster
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Ron O
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: TomS
• Re: Prime's
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: An apology
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: heekster
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie - but Madman does.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Susan S
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: heekster
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: eroot
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: eroot
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please believe me
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: eroot
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Prime's
  • From: eroot
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: eroot
• Re: TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: eroot
• Re: Scientific Fact: Species Immutability
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Prime's
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: SkyEyes
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Prime's
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• TALK.ORIGINS RECOMMENDED KILLFILE LIST 12-19-08
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Miguel
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Allen
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Iain
• Re: Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: poland
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: spintronic
• Nomination for TROLL of the Year (TOY)
  • From: Allen
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Note to Ray Martinez (2)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Prime's
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: spintronic
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Iain
• Re: Prime's
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Iain
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: spintronic
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: rnorman
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: RAM
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: RAM
• Re: Prime's
  • From: rnorman
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Prime's
  • From: spintronic
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Nike Jordans Fusion 23 AIR Jordan 22 Jordan Fusions 21 AIR
  • From: spintronic
• Challenge to the retarded.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: Boikat
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The situation appears hopeless.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please believe me
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Boikat
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: poland
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: The situation appears hopeless.
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Evolution is true, i swear it is, i really really do. Please believe me
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Vend
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Inez
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: Boikat
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Darwinian thinking
  • From: Boikat
• I know evolution is true, because, i know evolution is true
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: John McKendry
• The situation appears hopeless.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• If evolutionary theory were true
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Darwinian thinking
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: TomS
• Re: POTM nomination
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: brown55
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: [some stupid Pagano-changed thread title]
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Iain
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What about adman?
  • From: Iain
• What about adman?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: Iain
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• No evolution. What so ever.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Iain confuses Behe's test for IC with a claim about historical
  • From: Ron O
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Iain confuses Behe's test for IC with a claim about historical
  • From: Iain
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Nike Jordans Fusion 23 AIR Jordan 22 Jordan Fusions 21 AIR
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Vend
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bodega
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Susan S
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Test, Agent 5
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Wombat
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Carl Kaufmann
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Chez Watt! Was Re: The Vagina
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Tony decloaks momentarily to blather about something or other
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Inez
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Shane
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Shane
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: eroot
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Rodjk #613
• POTM nomination
  • From: geoproc
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Inez
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Iain confuses Behe's test for IC with a claim about historical
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: heekster
• Re: finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Carl Kaufmann
• Re: Iain confuses Behe's test for IC with a claim about historical
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Iain confuses Behe's test for IC with a claim about historical
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Vend
• Iain confuses Behe's test for IC with a claim about historical development of a system-among other mistakes
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• finally some good news: weyrich is dead
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Shane
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: Susan S
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: heekster
• Re: Great tribulation
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: TomS
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie - but Madman does.
  • From: TomS
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: DJT
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: 'Irreducible complexity' utterly irrelevant: I don't get it.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie - but Madman does.
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: 'Irreducible complexity' utterly irrelevant: I don't get it.
  • From: geoproc
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: DJT
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial teachings or even clarify existing ones
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• 'Irreducible complexity' utterly irrelevant: I don't get it.
  • From: Iain
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Random component of mutation refuted
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Frank J
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Inez
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Inez
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Inez
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: Stephen
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: eroot
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: DJT
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: DJT
• where's Sean . . . . . .?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Shane
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: About time
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: Great tribulation
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Woland
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: Burkhard
• Chez Watt
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Colorado Doctor Finds Foot In Newborn's Brain
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Lamarck was a Creationist
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: WangoTango
• Los Angeles Locksmith Call 1-877-364-5264
  • From: moving companies
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Stuart
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Stuart
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: rnorman
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: poland
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Dwib
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: RAM
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: spintronic
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: DJT
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: spintronic
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Steven L.
• OT: Test, Agent 5
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Great tribulation
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Great tribulation
  • From: spintronic
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Louann Miller
• OT: BHO picks fox to guard chicken coop (after horse escapes)
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: poland
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: halfstop
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie - but Madman does.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: TomS
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• test
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: test
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What use is half a leg?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• The laws of physics as they are played out--
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Augray
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• What use is half a leg?
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: About time
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: An apology
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Iain
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Iain
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Iain
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Rolf
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Iain
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Iain
• Re: An apology
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Wombat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: dylandog101
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: Shane
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: RAM
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: RAM
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: rnorman
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: Boikat
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Stuart
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Shane
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Evidence does NOT lie.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: A Hypothetical
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• test on different thingy setup whatcha call it there
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Yet ANOTHER Shake Up of the Tree of Life! Oh brother!
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: TomS
• A Hypothetical
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Boikat
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Boikat
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Evolution of Insect Castes
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• adman believes the jews are christ killers
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: An apology
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Uriel
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Uriel
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Chez Watt! Was Re: The Vagina
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: An apology
  • From: DJT
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: DJT
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: heekster
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: heekster
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: About time
  • From: heekster
• Re: About time
  • From: heekster
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: About time
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: nins
  • From: Steve O
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: heekster
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: eroot
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: eroot
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: heekster
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: heekster
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: An apology
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: About time
  • From: TomS
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: About time
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: About time
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: dylandog101
• Re: nins
  • From: wf3h
• nins
  • From: Iain
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: An apology
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: jcon
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Wombat
• Re: An apology
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: dylandog101
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: COMPUTER SIMULATION SHOWS WATCH EVOLVING
  • From: mike3
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Quantum Mechanics and science/evolution
  • From: dylandog101
• Re: About time
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: New Study of Archaeopteryx: Mineral Content May Yield Clues about
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: the origin of sneakers
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: An apology
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: About time
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• the origin of sneakers
  • From: bestplanetsneakers
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Iain
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: DJT
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Wombat
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: TomS
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Chez Watt was Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Vend
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Vend
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: wf3h
• Re: An apology
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: An apology
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: About time
  • From: Iain
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Woland
• evolutionary perspective on cystic fibrosis
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: WangoTango
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Reentrant
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: wf3h
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: JohnN
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Boikat
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: TomS
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: TomS
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: LTflermy
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: DJT
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: DJT
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: COMPUTER SIMULATION SHOWS WATCH EVOLVING
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Rolf
• There In No Discovery Here- Only Banter
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Vend
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: An apology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Boikat
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Wombat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ymir
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: About time
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Shane
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: geoproc
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: About time
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: heekster
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Winner: Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Chez Watt - was Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: eroot
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Shane
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Shane
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Augray
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins
  • From: Shane
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Shane
• Chez Twat
  • From: heekster
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: Update: The State of Islamic Creationism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Shane
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: heekster
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Uriel
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Uriel
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: Apology on E=m(c +/- alpha)^2
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: JennyB
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Woland
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: heekster
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Random-ness Peddlers And Back Pedaling Re Visited
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: About time
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Shane
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Woland
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: COMPUTER SIMULATION SHOWS WATCH EVOLVING
  • From: mike3
• Re: God uses loaded dice
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• God uses loaded dice
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Woland
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: TomS
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Woland
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Definitions of "Relationships"
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Worshiping a God of Vaginas was: Re: The Vagina
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ymir
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: sand snakes re: new reincarnation goal
  • From: JennyB
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Wombat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Reentrant
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Wombat
• Definitions of "Relationships"
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Ray's inability to refute exposed.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: About time
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Chez Watt? What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Woodsy
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Is consciousness an illusion?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• The Origin of Information for Transgenerational Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: TomS
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: TomS
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Bob T.
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Ray's inability to refute exposed.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Detailed evidence proving a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: fossilid
• Re: Evolution vs Abiogenesis
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: An apology
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Woland
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: New album completed: a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: fossilid
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ilas
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God} Yes.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: airbowline
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: George
• Chez Watt
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: George
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Wombat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Rolf
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Stuart
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: An apology
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: heekster
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God} Yes.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: William Morse
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: heekster
• Chez Watt
  • From: heekster
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: William Morse
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Darwinism concedes the debate to Creationism
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Uriel
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Uriel
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Shane
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Boikat
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: George
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: George
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: George
• Re: test
  • From: rnorman
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God} Yes.
  • From: Uriel
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Augray
• Re: Wasn't this an obvious frog on Mars?
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: Dan Drake
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: eroot
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Shane
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Stuart
• Re: The Vagina
  • From: Stuart
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: eroot
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• The Vagina
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: mike3
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Uriel
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: About time
  • From: eroot
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Susan S
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Dwib
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: rnorman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: heekster
• COMPUTER SIMULATION SHOWS WATCH EVOLVING
  • From: mike3
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: Catholic comment
  • From: Mike Painter
• Commentary: It's right to ask questions about evolution
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: origins of life and thermodynamics
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: eroot
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: eroot
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: eroot
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Ye Old One
• Catholic comment
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial teachings or even clarify existing ones
  • From: Bob Casanova
• origins of life and thermodynamics
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Winner: Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Rolf
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: MarkA
• Re: New album completed: a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: rnorman
• Re: News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Steps of the scientific method {proves God}
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: jcon
• The Origin of Transgenerational Developmental Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Woland
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: Stile4aly
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Vend
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: samvaknin
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: wf3h
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Tom Morris
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Shane
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: Shane
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Reentrant
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Shane
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: nothing new under the sun
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• nothing new under the sun
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Wombat
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: About time
  • From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Bodega
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: chris thompson
• [FAQ] Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins
  • From: David Iain Greig
• [FAQ] Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins
  • From: David Iain Greig
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Boikat
• Re: OT Wilkins emigrating
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Shane
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: OT Wilkins emigrating
  • From: Shane
• Re: OT Wilkins emigrating
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Boikat
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Boikat
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: William Morse
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: heekster
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Ray's inability to refute exposed.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: 1.23% part 2
  • From: wf3h
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• 1.23% part 2
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Epigenetic Origin of Phenotypic Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: heekster
• OT Wilkins emigrating
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Epigenetic Origin of Phenotypic Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial
  • From: wf3h
• Commentary: Study evolution facts and judge for yourself
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ET_Cetera/In_10_years_Darwinism_will_be_history/articleshow/3817029.cms
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: heekster
• The Synod was Pastoral ONLY and didn't offer any magisterial teachings or even clarify existing ones
  • From: T Pagano
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Shane
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: heekster
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Possible vs. Impossible
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Possible vs. Impossible
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Uriel
• Thomas Jefferson quotes of interest
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Uriel
• Re: radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: Uriel
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Possible vs. Impossible
  • From: heekster
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: heekster
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: heekster
• Re: About time
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: heekster
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• radioisotope dating FAQ
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: About time
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Ron O
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: questions for Seanpit about amino acids
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: questions for Seanpit about amino acids
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: New album completed: a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Inez
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Rolf
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: heekster
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: About time
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: A new policy
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: About time
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: About time
  • From: Iain
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Ralph Page
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: On the Epigenetic Origin of Phenotypic Plasticity
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: On the Epigenetic Origin of Phenotypic Plasticity
  • From: rnorman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Boikat
• On the Epigenetic Origin of Phenotypic Plasticity
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Hamish Reid
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Hamish Reid
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: A new policy
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: New album completed: a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: Augray
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: About time
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: TomS
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: rnorman
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT problems with news server aioe
  • From: Stephen
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Frank J
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: lecody
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Ron O
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: wf3h
• New album completed: a Carboniferous human femur
  • From: fossilid
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: wf3h
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Inez
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: eerok
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Frank J
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Zaius
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: test
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Lee
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Woland
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: About time
  • From: Boikat
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Boikat
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: rmj
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Woland
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: body
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: body
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: wf3h
• Re: About time
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Locksmith Los Angeles 24/7 Locksmiths
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: catholic synod on the word of god
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: catholic synod on the word of god
  • From: wf3h
• Re: oh darn
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: About time
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Earle Jones
• catholic synod on the word of god
  • From: wf3h
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Ron O
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: About time
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: Augray
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: About time
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: About time
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: rnorman
• A Carboniferous human femur's osteon is fully labelled here.
  • From: fossilid
• Re: About time
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: eroot
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Augray
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Augray
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: William Morse
• Re: About time
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: About time
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Frank J
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: DJT
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: wf3h
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Possible vs. Impossible
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Apparently random....
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Evolution by Computer: 1000aa in 1163 generations.
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: heekster
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: heekster
• Apparently random....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Uriel
• Re: Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: About time
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Woland
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Boikat
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: eroot
• Re: oh darn
  • From: eroot
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: eroot
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Boikat
• Re: About time
  • From: eroot
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: heekster
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: heekster
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evolution by Computer: 1000aa in 1163 generations.
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: body
  • From: heekster
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: heekster
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Paul J Gans
• About time
  • From: Boony
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Vend
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: heekster
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: rnorman
• Re: body
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Vend
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Ray offering his services to UcD
  • From: Rolf
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: body
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: body
  • From: heekster
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: heekster
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: heekster
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: forensic DNA testing
  • From: rnorman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: hersheyh
• forensic DNA testing
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: Woland
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: body
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: heekster
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: Cabbage
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: jcon
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: body
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: oh darn
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: oh darn
  • From: Augray
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: SeppoP
• New Theory On Man's Origins
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• oh darn
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: SortingItOut
• Department of Statistics, Yale University
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Evolution by Computer: 1000aa in 1163 generations.
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Uprooting the Tree of Life
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: body
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Wombat
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Chez Watt (Re: All physical matter is life created by a common
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: heekster
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: heekster
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Expelled: Road Apples
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Chez Watt - Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: heekster
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Boikat
• Ray's inability to refute exposed.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: eroot
• Chez Watt (Re: All physical matter is life created by a common
  • From: nmp
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: eroot
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: strange
  • From: TomS
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: lecody
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: TomS
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Augray
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Possible vs. Impossible
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: TomS
• Re: "Meaningless Gibberish"
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "Meaningless Gibberish"
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: strange
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: TomS
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: fossilid
• Re: Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Nomen Publicus
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Possible vs. Impossible
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Rock dating help
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Rock dating help
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Rock dating help
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: fossilid
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: A God!
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Expelled: Road Apples
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: Wesley R. Elsberry
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: Wesley R. Elsberry
• Re: ID from earth
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Epigenetic determination of camouflage
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• EXPELLED: NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED - PART 1 OF 11
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: A God!
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Evolution by Computer: 1000aa in 1163 generations.
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Boikat
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Evolution by Computer: 1000aa in 1163 generations.
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: body
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• "Meaningless Gibberish"
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Possible vs. Impossible
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Evolution by Computer: 1000aa in 1163 generations.
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Dave Barry on t.o denizens
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: wf3h
• Re: ID from earth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Creationism and Teleology
  • From: George
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: AC
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: heekster
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: ID from earth
  • From: Zaius
• Re: Possible vs. Likely
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: body
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: poland
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: heekster
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Creationism and Teleology
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: body
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: A God!
  • From: chibiabos
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evolution by Computer
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: A God!
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: A God!
  • From: wf3h
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: Vend
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Wombat
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Wombat
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: A God!
  • From: null
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: eroot
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Inez
• A God!
  • From: Iain
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Frank J
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Richard Smol
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: slothrop
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: SkyEyes
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: In the News: Muslim Scientists Prepare for Battle With
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: rnorman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: In the News: Muslim Scientists Prepare for Battle With
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: In the News: Muslim Scientists Prepare for Battle With Creationists
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Phred Phelps Ph*cks Up Christmas in Olympia Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: body
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: body
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: AC
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: AC
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Iain
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Inez
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Inez
• Re: Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: Frank J
• Change in server for TOA, change in domain: toarchive.org
  • From: Wesley R. Elsberry
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• another book review: slavery, evolution and the bible
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: No need for statistics in science?
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: AC
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: AC
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: slothrop
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: rnorman
• Re: slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• David Klinghoffer on Ghosts, etc.
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• slavery and biblical literalism
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: TomS
• On the Cortical Inheritance
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: body
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: body
  • From: Bozweb
• Re: body
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: TomS
• body
  • From: stephanie
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Grandbank
• Chez Watt! Re: Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: Inez
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Inez
• Re:
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: lecody
• Inevitability of All Occurrences
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re:
  • From: TomS
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ET_Cetera/In_10_years_Darwinism_will_be_history/articleshow/3817029.cms
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: TomS
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Stuart
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Iain
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ET_Cetera/In_10_years_Darwinism_will_be_history/articleshow/3817029.cms
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Bodega
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Chez Watt: Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: George
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: test
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Back Peddling With "Randomness"
  • From: Primary AL
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Whale Evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Whale Evolution
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• ID from earth
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: eroot
• Re: In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Nothing but a fairytale
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• No need for statistics in science?
  • From: Seanpit
• All mutations are bad(tm)!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: test
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Dave Barry on t.o denizens
  • From: William Morse
• In the News: Harun Yahya makes a prediction
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Evolution of Personality
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Evolution by Computer
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Definition of Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Definition of Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Nothing but a fairytale
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: POTM nomination: Nothing but a fairytale
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Evolution by Computer
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Evolution by Computer
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Augray
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Woland
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: In the News: Muslim Scientists Prepare for Battle With
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: In the News: Muslim Scientists Prepare for Battle With
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Augray
• Talk dot origins archive web?
  • From: Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)
• In the News: Muslim Scientists Prepare for Battle With Creationists
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: test
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: Inez
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: OT problems with news server aioe
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Inez
• Re: OT problems with news server aioe
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: strange
  • From: Max
• Re: Steve in cabinet
  • From: jcon
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: strange
  • From: Max
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Kent Paul Dolan
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: SkyEyes
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "Darwinist" as an epithet, anti-science as a hate crime
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Universal Ancestors
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Iain
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: gregwrld
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: science stuff: Barack vs. Bush
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: Martin Andersen
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: Woland
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: TomS
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Steven L.
• Transition to Eukaryotes: Genetic and Epigenetic Contributions
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: jcon
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Steven L.
• Universal Ancestors
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Different Kinds of Random Walks
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: lecody
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the classrooms
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: lecody
• Re: Dave Barry on t.o denizens
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: Woodsy
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: Wombat
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Dave Barry on t.o denizens
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: Dwib
• Re: News: Best Pictures of Microscopic Life, 2008.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: geoproc
• Re: News: Best Pictures of Microscopic Life, 2008.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Way to go.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Religion as Part of Evolution
  • From: lecody
• Re: test
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: test
  • From: rnorman
• Re: test
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: test
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: I'm not a scientist, but I play one on TV
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: Wombat
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ron O
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2
  • From: spintronic
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT problems with news server aioe
  • From: eerok
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Max
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: eroot
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: Another transitional fossil found.
  • From: partso2
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Wombat
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Boikat
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: science stuff: Barack vs. Bush
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Harry K
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: strange
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Harry K
• Re: strange
  • From: William Morse
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for November 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Apology on E=m(c +/- alpha)^2
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for November 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for November 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Klaus Hellnick
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: science stuff: Barack vs. Bush
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: wf3h
• Re: test
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: rmcbane
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Boikat
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: William Morse
• Re: test
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Best Pictures of Microscopic Life, 2008.
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: "Darwinist" as an epithet, anti-science as a hate crime
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Steve in cabinet
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: test
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: wf3h
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: VoiceOfReason
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: A new policy
  • From: rnorman
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: OT problems with news server aioe
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Shane
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• does being an atheist or theist make you happy? yes, says this
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Data Does Not Lie
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Data Does Not Lie
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: A new policy
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: test
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Xavier Onnasis
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: eroot
• Re: Steve in cabinet
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Steve O
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Steve in cabinet
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Data Does Not Lie
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Mike Painter
• Dave Barry on t.o denizens
  • From: Jon Fleming
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Inez
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Poll: More Americans Believe in the Devil, Hell and Angels than
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Origin
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: OT problems with news server aioe
  • From: Michiel
• Letter: We need to get back to teaching real science in the classrooms
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: A new policy
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Inez
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: News: Sweet Find in Search for Alien Life.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Iain
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Iain
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• OT problems with news server aioe
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: eroot
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: eroot
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Cj
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Shane
• Re: test (ignore)
  • From: Michiel
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: eroot
• Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Iain
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Iain
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Iain
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Re: SETI, ID and the "I Don't Know" argument
  • From: Inez
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Iain
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Dice and Specificity
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Sweet Find in Search for Alien Life.
  • From: 9fingers
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Gaps and DNA vs. English
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Inez
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Inez
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Iain
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Dice and Specificity
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: wf3h
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Boony
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: marcodbeast
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Inez
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Wombat
• Re: "Darwinist" as an epithet, anti-science as a hate crime
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: "Darwinist" as an epithet, anti-science as a hate crime
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: AC
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Wombat
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: AC
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Lee
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: The evolving story of evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• The evolving story of evolution
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: News: Best Pictures of Microscopic Life, 2008.
  • From: Inez
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Inez
• Re: News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: News: Sweet Find in Search for Alien Life.
  • From: Desertphile
• What does CSI space look like?
  • From: geoproc
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: DougC
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Romania removes theory of evolution from school curriculum
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: MAKE MONEY FAST USING PAYPAL!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: an atheist christmas
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: johnethompson2001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Is this the time for evodevo?
  • From: CNCabej
• Talk hosts and Olympia display
  • From: Harry K
• Re: OT - Blagojevich
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: What is science? (Question for Ray)
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: slothrop
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Genealogies Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Wombat
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: jcon
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: I'm not a scientist, but I play one on TV
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Inez
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Nothing but a fairytale
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: hersheyh
• Genealogies Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Robert Grumbine
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Vend
• Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: POTM nomination: Nothing but a fairytale
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: TomS
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: test
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The real equation is E=M(C +/- theeta)^2
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Chez Watt Ballot 4 December 2008
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: TomS
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: questions for Seanpit about amino acids
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• test
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: questions for Seanpit about amino acids
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Inez
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Wombat
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Boikat
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: John S. Wilkins
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: unrestrained_hand
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Bodega
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Lee
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: News: Dogs Chase Efficiently, But Cats Skulk Counterintuitively.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: EvilBrian
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: William Morse
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Boikat
• Re: News: Best Pictures of Microscopic Life, 2008.
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: William Morse
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Appearance of Chance (Dembski's bombshell)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: The Appearance of Randomness
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: I'm not a scientist, but I play one on TV
  • From: heekster
• Re: Data Does Not Lie
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: I'm not a scientist, but I play one on TV
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: On the Origins of Atheism
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• I'm not a scientist, but I play one on TV
  • From: Susan S
• News: Religious 'shun nanotechnology'.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Angels & Theistic Evolution
  • From: Chris M
• News: Best Pictures of Microscopic Life, 2008.
  • From: Ye Old One
• News: Sweet Find in Search for Alien Life.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: OT - Blagojevich
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: strange
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Definition of Randomness
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: strange
  • From: Steve O
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• News: Envy is a dog's life, study finds.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Still a Palin in the ass
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Chaos vs. Randomness
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: DC Howlerfest January 2009
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: questions for Seanpit about amino acids
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Hunches and guesses
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Inez
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Definition of "Species"?
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Humans, chimps, wheat and frogs
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: What Pitman never did
  • From: _Arthur
• Re: OT - Blagojevich
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Lenny it clearly states in the bible that 666 is the number of
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: jcon
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: seanpitnospam
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Lenny it clearly states in the bible that 666 is the number of
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: The Appearance of Randomness
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: What Pitman never did
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: OT - Blagosevich
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Definition of Randomness (Wilkins quote mining project)
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Definition of Randomness
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: heekster
• Re: Pitman numerology
  • From: Seanpit
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• OT - Blagosevich
  • From: Perplexed in Peoria
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Definition of Randomness (Wilkins quote mining project)
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: heekster
• Re: Nothing but a fairytale
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Research on gene duplication as source of functional novelty
  • From: heekster
• Re: The Appearance of Randomness
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: The Appearance of Randomness
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Definition of Randomness
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Study: Smarter Men Have Better Quality Sperm
  • From: Burkhard
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Stuart
• Re: creation is perfect
  • From: Toddie Simians
• Re: The Appearance of Randomness
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: eroot
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: eroot
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Darwinism fails again
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Definition of Randomness (Wilkins quote mining project)
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: Matt Silberstein
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: 1.23 percent
  • From: \(M\)-adman
• Re: Yahoo evolution Question
  • From: John Harsh