Re: Sad anniversary
- From: heekster <heekster@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:35:12 -0600
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:08:26 -0600, "\(M\)-adman" <grat@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
heekster wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:27:47 -0600, "\(M\)-adman" <grat@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:04:14 -0600, "\(M\)-adman"
<grat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in talk.origins:
Frank J wrote:
On Nov 29, 8:48 am, "\(M\)-adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
chris thompson wrote:
A good man gone:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2oFESUMWhU
Chris
I bet he did not believe in evolution
It's possible. He was not a scientist, so if he only heard anti-
evolution sound bites and gave little thought to them he could
have found them convincing. Then there was this "Lord" thing.
You know, Hallelujah, Hare Krishna, Do Lang Do Lang, etc.
He did go searching India for God and he did write the "My Sweet
Lord" song.
Chances are, he believed in creation given the time period he
grew up in.
He grew up in the UK where such religious lies are not common at
all. The Anglican Church does not teach your foolishness, nor do
the Catholics or Methodists. Most Brits don't really care about
religion. Now, why would you make such a silly comment?
This:
<QUOTE>
After his death, the Harrison family released the following
statement: "He left this world as he lived in it: conscious of God,
fearless of death and at peace; surrounded by family and friends."
Harrison had often said, "Everything else can wait, but the search
for God cannot wait." </QUOTE>
So, from this we can ascertain that you do not know the difference
between a deity, and a religion.
Imagine that.
From this we can asertain that you do not know the difference between somoene that believes inGod and probably does not believe in evolution because he believes in a creator and someone that
does not believe in God but does believe in evolution.
It must be tough, maintaining such absolute standards of willful
ignorance, intentional stupidity, an utter disregard for punctuation,
sentence structure, and orthography.
And, on top of that, intentional, dishonest prevarication, and a
complete inability to read for comprehension.
Watching you discuss anything brings to mind a red-ass baboon at the
zoo, flinging its own scat mindlessly at passersby.
HTHOf course, it doesn't. It is just another unintelligible, nonsensical
imbecility, and a lie.
.
- References:
- Sad anniversary
- From: chris thompson
- Re: Sad anniversary
- From: \(M\)-adman
- Re: Sad anniversary
- From: Frank J
- Re: Sad anniversary
- From: \(M\)-adman
- Re: Sad anniversary
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Sad anniversary
- From: \(M\)-adman
- Re: Sad anniversary
- From: heekster
- Re: Sad anniversary
- From: \(M\)-adman
- Sad anniversary
- Prev by Date: Re: Ray Martinez and MRSA
- Next by Date: Re: Bwahahah!!!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Sad anniversary
- Next by thread: Re: Sad anniversary
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|