Re: Humans can't produce informationally complex DNA?

On Nov 16, 10:07 am, Seanpit <seanpitnos...@naturalselection.
0catch.com> wrote:
On Nov 15, 9:01 pm, wf3h <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Not beyond the 1000aa level they don't. There's not a single example
of evolution in action beyond this level. This level is only crossed,
in real time, by deliberate design.

You keep making this claim. You state it axiomatically.
Where is the evidence?


prove it. if RM/NS is not involved, then what is the mechanism?

The mechanism could be very similar to the mechanisms used by humans
to produce high-level functional information within DNA.

So, where's the physical evidence of this?

After all,
SETI scientists say that the mechanism for production of the type of
radio signals they are looking for could be similar to the mechanisms
humans use to produce these types of radio signals. It's the same
basic argument.

Seti scientists have the mechanisms, they don't have the
signals.

IDers assert baldly and without evidence, in a way that is
indistinguishable from merely a statement of ignorance, that they
have the signals. They don't really have the mechanisms, nor
do they have any physical evidence.

You see, ID would be like "bad SETI" if the SETI people asserted
that the preponderance of signals out there were artificial, and
made up ad hoc explanations for why the signals couldn't have
a natural origin, only *then* would ID asserters be doing the same
thing as SETI. ID would be "bad SETI".



Sean Pitmanwww.DetectingDesign.com


-John

.

Relevant Pages