Re: Challenge to Evolutionists...

On Nov 11, 8:20 pm, Gerard <markgerard...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 11, 10:09 am, Louann Miller <louan...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snip
..

You don't assume the electrical engineers are lying about t.v., that it's
caused by direct miracles from God instead of electronics. Why do you
assume the biologists are lying?

Electrical engineers make practical use of identifiable electrical
energy.

EEs however are not scientists. Evolutionary scientists make use of
identifiable mechanism of evolutionary change.

There is no identifiable mechanism in "evolution theory" which
is harnassed to work in biology.

The mechanism of evolutionary theory is variation and selection acting
on populations over generations.

If that were possible, we'd be seeing
new species develop in a laboratory.

News flash: Species have developed in labs, and in the wild, under
observation.

However, before using viruses or
bacterias as faulty examples, you must understand, there must be
distinctions made in certain specimens because of the theological
monopoly placed on some potential specimens used.

What "theological monopoly"? Viruses and bacteria are used because
they have very short generation times, which makes it much easier to
see changes in the populations.

When that rule is
applied, there is no demonstrable or identifiable mechanism in
evolution.

The mechanism of evolution is well identified. It's variation and
selection.

If you want me to elaborate I will.

Please do, as you seem very confused.

But the challenge is on
every evolutionists' shoulder, not on a faith based religion.

Faith based religion is irrelevant to scientific theories.
Evolution doesn't try to contradict religions, and by the same token,
isn't interested in protecting religious beliefs from scientific
findings.

Get to
work. Point me to a book or manual which clearly demonstrates
photographically and journalistically, the identifiable players which
work to bring about random mutations,

Why should others do your homework for you? Random mutations are
caused by a number of factors, incluidng radiation, chemcials, copy
mistakes, etc.

gene regulation,

See:
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/P/Promoter.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetic_regulation



structural
formations and the like.

http://pathmicro.med.sc.edu/mayer/geneticreg.htm


DJT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Double Standard
    ... work of a fiction writer whose creativity exceeds George Lucas, ... were using dry irony) I think that makes it a far superior read than ... And yet here you are reading stuff concocted by evolution ... confined to religion, my friend. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolutionism the religion
    ... Belief in evolution carries no ... How, then, is evolution a religion? ... > scientific Humanism. ... Many of the scientists who work in the field of evolution are not ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: Why Should Evolution be Taught as Science in Schools?
    ... some religion, ... aspect of evolution. ... "changed from the last common ancestor of the species being ... itself, one of those moral principles, any more than a sculptor's ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Fear keeps archaic beliefs alive
    ... evolution as accepted science and urges those who espouse ... engage in recreational sex without fear of pregnancy. ... against female equality in the modern world--specifically, ... one of the more obvious features about religion is how it ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: MORE Evidence the Earth was created
    ... discover facts that are not explained. ... combustion - both of these were once possibilities for absolute truth, ... Evolution is considered to be true and it is presented as such in the ... theory helps science but it harms religion. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading