Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 03:06:43 -0600
"John Wilkins" <j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1ipw5kn.2xhbnh1gmd93mN%j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Suzanne <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:John, I teach English in America. Here it has a period.
"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2ivtg4diiokjcmpguk9vomhp0ol3acl1cu@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 07:00:24 -0600, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>In American English grammar, there is a period after
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rhqqg41eaos6fb3797pteeuvns96g21ge7@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 23:39:43 -0500, "Suzanne"In the story that I related, no one had to pay for a replacement
<shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
"chris thompson" <chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4bbeb3cd-0ac0-4d22-baad-48d58f3d4cf9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 31, 7:41 pm, "Suzanne" <shil...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"John Wilkins" <j.wilki...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1ipol89.1jsvcbfvnsg48N%j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> In the
"Evidences?
What Evidences?" category:
If they knew who he was,
they would worship him. But even a new Christian is
not born spiritually knowing God. He learns who he is,
as he follows him. But the Christian has an example of
God's sacrificial love for him because of Christ's
having
given his life for him.
And yet you can provide not one single scrap of evidence
to
support
that claim.
A Christian doesn't need to give evidence. Christ is the
evidence.
John, suppose that a king was told by a poor man that
he didn't care about him. The king then leaves his throne,
and goes to the poor man's house and says to the man,
what can I do for you? The poor man says, "I can't work
this month because I have injured my foot very badly.
The king then asks where the man's job is, and then leaves.
The poor man thinks as the king leaves "he just doesn't
get it."
In a few weeks, the man is a little better, but his foot is
still not well. He hears a knock at the door. It is someone
with a bag of money for him. The poor man says, where
did this money come from? The one who brought the
bag of money said to him, "a man that looked very much
like our king said you were sick and that he wanted to
do your work for you, and that we were to bring the
wages to your house and give them for you." Now the
king was rich enough that he could have paid the man the
money he would be needing when he normally would
have received his wages. But the king wanted to show
that man that he truly cared about him, and also cared
for the position that he held at the company that he worked
for, enough to fill it and get his job done for him.
When I said that the evidence is Christ, this story
illustrates what I was meaning by that. The Lord came
himself, leaving his throne in Heaven, and became one
of us, in order to do for us something that we cannot
do for ourselves. He came, in person.
Suzanne
Paid sick leave is not a christian invention.
From Suzanne:
I see you are still to bloody lazy/inconsiderate to fix your
software.
Paid sick leave does not have someone do the man's job
for him. The employer has no one stepping in for the
man's job
In many cases he does, and has to pay the temporary replacement
as
well.
for the man. His job was completely filled and his wages
also were given to him just as though he had been there, and
doing his job.
You can make a fictional story say anything you want, just look
what
the writers did with the bible.
GRACE spelled out in words is
God's Riches At Christ's Expense.
It also spells out Good Rats Ate Cheese Exclusively.
Thanks for helping me across your bridge, Mr. Troll. : )
and he has to pay the man wages anyway.
What I described showed that the job was filled as well
as the pay being delivered.
Fairy story.
--
Bob.
May I point out that there is no full stop after Mr in correct
English.
"Mr." because it is an abbreviation. This is the correct
way to write it.
It is a contraction, not an abbreviation, and so it takes no point.
The
difference:
Mister -> M...r -> Mr
Editor -> Ed... -> Ed.
However, in business writing, a new trend has arisen
with some to leave off the period.
Suzanne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: Earle Jones
- Re: Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- References:
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: chris thompson
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
- Prev by Date: Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- Next by Date: Re: OT: McCain concedes
- Previous by thread: Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading