Re: just as the bible claims

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:43:43 -0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by "Mike Dworetsky"
<platinum198@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

There seems to be a problem with the attributions here...

"Boikat" <boikat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e127e226-b86d-4052-8dca-4427e52080db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Oct 30, 4:26 pm, "\(M\)-adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Prof Weird wrote:
On Oct 30, 3:07 pm, "\(M\)-adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The roots of T-Rex teeth were only 2 inches deep. Had he bit into
the hide of another dinosaur he would have lost teeth.

THAT means t-rex was a vegetarian

http://allphilosophy.com/topic/3725
--

This has been another:
"helping the evolutionist' to understand" moment, with:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
·.¸Adman¸.·
^^^^^^^^^^^

Really ? And the EVIDENCE to back up his words that T-rex was a
vegetarian, that ALL its teeth had 'shallow' roots (not all teeth were
the same size), and that chlorophyll was discovered on the tooth is
what again ?

I could also equally claim that 'given recent examination of
(m)adman's skull, his idiocy is quite explainable due to lack of an
actual brain' and provide this link :
http://asymptotia.com/wp-images/2008/02/wallpaper-brain.jpg
as evidence.

rex STAN Tooth - 11cm (4.5
in)http://www.bhigr.com/store/product.php?productid=52#detailed

You can see the pair of roots at the end.

That's not a "pair of roots", dumbass, that's a single root that was
probably collapsed due to either new teeth growing in, or collapse due
to compression from sediment as the tooths' softer root was squashed
as it was being compressed before the sediment lithified.


They look to be 1/3 side of the tooth.

Thats a root of 1.5"

finis`

You know nothing about tooth morphology, do you?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MD:
In fact, even the caption of the picture Madman referred to states that the
groove is due to the position of the replacement tooth growing alongside the
larger tooth. It isn't a bifurcated tooth root.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

.

Relevant Pages

  • Considering an implant to replace #10 (long)
    ... I lost my adult #10 tooth to root absorption after ... whole visible area of the tooth turned pink and then black. ... My parents and I discussed having an implant or bridge ... I had my teeth cleaned last week, ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Two dental puzzles...
    ... Mexican dentistry that I've observed is extremely poor. ... this was YOUR tooth, and NOT what you would recommend to a patient. ... looks the worst on a recent X-ray (with part of the tip of the root being ... broken-off teeth, that for various reasons were not suitable for crowning ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: To extract or not to extract....
    ... a retreated root canal is quite likely to remain a failure. ... IOW's I would recommend extraction *almost* every time this ... the wisdom tooth is unlikely to move the other teeth forward to ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: just as the bible claims
    ... T. rex had teeth of differing sizes in it's mouth. ... The tooth in the ... The large teeth measured up to twelve inches long (root and crown), ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Yet another ID lie - Humans do evolve.
    ... >> Teeth are not at all like bone in either their anatomy or histology. ... Tooth structure just wears or breaks. ... exactly feel the need to go gathering evidence for you? ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading