Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic

On 2008-10-15, \(M)-adman <grat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John Harshman wrote:
(M)-adman wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
(M)-adman wrote:
Nashton wrote:
Boikat wrote:
On Oct 13, 4:58 pm, Jim Willemin <jim***willemin@hot***mail.com>
wrote:
"\(M\)-adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
innews:p5PIk.49477$vX2.2678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Recent archeological discovery of Indian remains (including
dogs buried with them) in Bienville Parish, LA, has been dated
at 5,630 BC. Since these tribes migrated up from south
America, the pyramids in south America obviously came first.
Yet another example of how dating methods are wrong.
http://www.catahoulaleopard.com/Old_ones.htm
You have GOT to be kidding on this one. Please tell me you're
kidding. By this 'reasoning', since the Anglo-Saxon inhabitants
of the New
World came from Europe, it follows that everything built by New
World Anglo-Saxons is younger than anything in Europe (e.g. the
Holland Tunnel is younger
than the Dover-Calais Chunnel).
Where does he even get the idea the remains were from people that
migrated north from South America?
History fool. Get to know it.
No, seriously. This is a novel idea as far as I know. Did you make
it up yourself or find it somewhere? If the latter, where?

can't you read?

I can. But what was I supposed to be reading? Neither your post nor
the newspaper article you cited mention anything about it.

ok, I'll dumb this down.

1) The dating methods claim the pyramids in Egypt are older then the
pyramids in south America. We had a discussion in a thread on this.

The pyramids in Egypt are older than the pyramids in Central America.
(There aren't any pyramids in South America.)

2)Archeological evidence says the Gaza pyramids are around 2500 years old.
Dating methods agree.

Yes.

3) The article I posted clearly shows evidence of North American people
older then 2500 years old.

Yes.

4) It is a known fact that humans from north America crossed the Bering
Straight land bridge AND they also migrated upward from south America.

No. All Americans migrated via the Bering Straight originally.

5) Let's do some math.

A) No, no evidence of man in Gaza prior to 2500 BC

I wonder how you got this absurd idea. There is evidence of human
settlements in Egypt going back to at least 10,000 B.C.

B) Yes, yes there is evidence of man in America prior to 2500 BC

Yes, there is.

C) Yes, Pyramids in both places

Pyramids which are quite different.

If man was Not in Gaza prior to 2500 BC, BUT man was in the Americas prior
to 2500 BC then the pyramids in South America are older.

Man was in Giza prior to 2500 B.C.

Which equals your dating methods are wrong either way you look at it..

No.

Because if the dates are correct in Gaza, then they are wrong in south
America. But we know man was in south America first. So your dated are wrong
in Gaza as well as in south America.

Giza. And now.

Your dating methods are flawed as usual and spintronic pointed this out in
his thread with the dead mother and child

Now you have more proof.

It really is THAT simple

You really are that simple.

Mark

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic
    ... America, the pyramids in south America obviously came first. ... The dating methods claim the pyramids in Egypt are older then the pyramids in south America. ... Migration into the Americas - approximately 15-20 millenia ago ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic
    ... America, the pyramids in south America obviously came first. ... Yet another example of how dating methods are wrong. ... of even earlier migrations. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic
    ... America, the pyramids in south America obviously came first. ... The dating methods claim the pyramids in Egypt are older then the pyramids in south America. ... 2)Archeological evidence says the Gaza pyramids are around 2500 years old. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic
    ... then the pyramids in south America. ... The pyramids in Egypt are older than the pyramids in Central ... If it's a lie then it should be trivially easy fro you to point out where you have shown that various common dating methods, like radiometric dating, are inaccurate. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic
    ... America, the pyramids in south America obviously came first. ... Gaza is on the migration route which took man out of Africa ...
    (talk.origins)