Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview

On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 03:49:37 -0500, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:


"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ubeae4h7khachf6nn827dgfmd8khd83cse@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:48:44 -0500, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:


"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qgu8e4d6l0ljm43khk9iq8c97np4qa5noh@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:00:58 -0500, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:


"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e32vb4h40rr3tjoi5q4h309a6aiqocj1ed@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:34:42 -0500, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:


"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i2jtb45lojh6plftt5rjemgk7i9e47gi4g@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:00:12 -0500, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:


"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ejisb4pqiv86i3g7p82br643q16l7u74ii@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:01:54 -0500, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:


"Ye Old One" <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dtqpb4ldq7ba7nahkjes2h7v1sc3ja26i8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 19:20:37 -0500, "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:

[snip]
I see. No comment from you. Strange that.

I've shown you the evidence at Jericho. It's very,
very detailed, and accurate.

No, it is not that detailed and, most importantly, it does not
match
the biblical dates.

I don't agree with you at all,

I don't care whether you agree or not - those are the scientific
results.

Scientific results, no. The archaeologists are the science
persons, not "the majority" that you claim are for your
date.

Well, archaeologists are not really scientists. They hand their finds
to scientists for dating, usually by radiocarbon dating.

Bob, I've shown you that Jericho has been dated by
radiocarbon dating to 1400 B.C. by Woods "plus
or minus 40 years" most recently by Woods.

And very few accept that figure because it is anomalous, the
overwhelming majority of test put the destruction of Jericho at around
1600BC.

Very few liberal people.

I don't know what political persuasion the scientists are. I don't
even know what religious persuasion they are. But I do know that they
are proper scientists who publish their results in proper peer
reviewed publications.

It's a little more complicated than just going by
carbon dating, though. Many of the other dates
are formed by people confusing the Hyksos with
the Israelites.

Do stop talking rubbish. The Hyksos were earlier, 17th century BC. The
Israelites emerged out of the general population in Canaan around
1200-1000BC.

Kathleen Kenyon is said to have
done this also.

Cite?

Part of the reason people get them
confused is because of confusion over what
Josephus said about the Hebrews being in Egypt.

They were not, at least not in any large number.

Josephus reported that the Hyksos were in Egypt,
and built monuments there. People came along,
and not knowing the difference, they printed that
he said the Hebrews were in Egypt. Well...there
are Hebrews that were not Israelites. They are all
Semitic people, which means they are descendants
of Shem [S(h)emitic] who is one of the sons of
Noah.

You are getting fiction confused with reality again.


[Snip more rubbish.]

--
Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evolution is not a fact
    ... enriched this group when s/he wrote: ... scientific explanation of the processes involved in evolution. ... Not when used in science. ... scientists have sought to create better methodology. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
    ... enriched this group when s/he wrote: ... archaeologists are not really scientists. ... Israelites emerged out of the general population in Canaan around ... the confusion is yours - mainly I think caused by your firm belief ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution is not a fact
    ... enriched this group when s/he ... There is only one form of evolution - not two. ... by scientists in the evolutionary continuum of the descendants of a ... There is some contention about whether it's actually important in evolution, but there should be no contention about whether it can be reduced to microevolution; ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: Evolution is not a fact
    ... enriched this group when s/he wrote: ... Theory is a probe. ... even scientists use the common meaning of the ... Scientists are not usually that sloppy. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
    ... enriched this group when s/he wrote: ... archaeologists are not really scientists. ... are formed by people confusing the Hyksos with ... Israelites emerged out of the general population in Canaan around ...
    (talk.origins)
Quantcast