talk.origins
- Seed Magazine's endorsement of Obama - Off the deep end?,
Robert Camp
- O.T (reply if you choose),
\(M\)-adman
- Emergence of Modern Human Behavior,
TomS
- Why can’t students critically analyze evolution?,
Frank J
- Cool, especially if you've read _The Mountains of Madness_,
Paul Ciszek
- OT Stem Cells,
metspitzer
- News: No modern-day relatives for Alps mummy, says 'Iceman' study.,
Ye Old One
- non-literalness of the word "day".,
lundslaktare
- News: Dinosaur Smelling Skills Open New Angle On Bird Evolution.,
Ye Old One
- News: Simulator allows scientists to predict evolutions next best move.,
Ye Old One
- just as the bible claims,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: just as the bible claims,
zob95
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Inez
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Prof Weird
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Ye Old One
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Bob Casanova
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Bill Hudson
- Re: just as the bible claims,
richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: just as the bible claims,
heekster
- Re: just as the bible claims,
heekster
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Boikat
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Zaius
- Re: just as the bible claims,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: just as the bible claims,
John Vreeland
- Re: just as the bible claims,
richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: just as the bible claims,
wf3h
- Re: just as the bible claims,
R Brown
- Re: just as the bible claims,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: just as the bible claims,
johnethompson2001
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Nomen Publicus
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Boikat
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Grandbank
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Steven L.
- Re: just as the bible claims,
gregwrld
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Steven L.
- Re: just as the bible claims,
chris thompson
- Re: just as the bible claims,
Max
- A simple formula,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A simple formula,
Inez
- Re: A simple formula,
Prof Weird
- Re: A simple formula,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A simple formula,
Prof Weird
- Re: A simple formula,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A simple formula,
Uriel
- Re: A simple formula,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: A simple formula,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A simple formula,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: A simple formula,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A simple formula,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: A simple formula,
wf3h
- Re: A simple formula,
rossum
- Re: A simple formula,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: A simple formula,
Bill Hudson
- Re: A simple formula,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: A simple formula,
eroot
- Re: A simple formula,
John Stockwell
- Re: A simple formula,
Inez
- Re: A simple formula,
Ye Old One
- Re: A simple formula,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: A simple formula,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Vampire Moth Discovered -- Evolution at Work.,
eroot
- Veger,
spintronic
- Ray promises to publish 'quality work', like Darwin,
Rolf
- Regarding <jewbecile@googlemail.com> et al.,
None
- Darwin Exhibit at University College London,
Mike Dworetsky
- Thundernews (may be) working again,
Garamond Lethe
- Scientology,
spintronic
- Re: Scientology,
chris thompson
- Re: Scientology,
Uriel
- Re: Scientology,
Rolf
- Re: Scientology,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Scientology,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Scientology,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientology,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
William Morse
- Re: Scientology,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientology,
Bob Berger
- Re: Scientology,
Kermit
- Re: Scientology,
Timberwoof
- Re: Scientology,
*Hemidactylus*
- Re: Scientology,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Scientology,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Scientology,
Sleepalot
- Re: Scientology,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Scientology,
dkomo
- Re: Scientology,
William Morse
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Scientology,
Timberwoof
- Re: Scientology,
John Wilkins
- Re: Scientology,
heekster
- Re: Scientology,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Scientology,
William Morse
- Re: Scientology,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Scientology,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Scientology,
*Hemidactylus*
- Re: Scientology,
Caranx latus
- Re: Scientology,
*Hemidactylus*
- Re: Scientology,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Scientology,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Scientology,
eroot
- Re: Scientology,
Desertphile
- Just an observation.,
Nashton
- Evolutionary thinking before Darwin.,
Rolf
- What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Caranx latus
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
John Harshman
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
eerok
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Boikat
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Boikat
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Shane
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Boikat
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
heekster
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Zaius
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
dali_70
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
heekster
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Kermit
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Caranx latus
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Caranx latus
- Re: What, if anything, should I do about this?,
Robert Carnegie
- News: Evolution Of Genes That Trigger The Body's Immune Response To Viral Infection.,
Ye Old One
- Chez Watt,
heekster
- News: Cave reveals ursine evolution.,
Ye Old One
- News: Vampire Moth Discovered -- Evolution at Work.,
Ye Old One
- Miller experiment lecture,
Perplexed in Peoria
- An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
John Harshman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Cheezits
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Augray
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Lee
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Startlemyerfieldson
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Startlemyerfieldson
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
AC
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Cheezits
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Cheezits
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Cheezits
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Boikat
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Boikat
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
The Pooflinger
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
The Pooflinger
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
AC
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Boikat
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Boikat
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
TomS
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Ray Martinez
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
TomS
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Ray Martinez
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Bill Hudson
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Ray Martinez
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Stephen
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
eerok
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Lee Jay
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
John Wilkins
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Inez
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
heekster
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Bodega
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
raven1
- Re: An Apology to ALL,
Shane
- Diagnosis,
spintronic
- Re: Diagnosis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Diagnosis,
Joe Cummings
- Re: Diagnosis,
Startlemyerfieldson
- Re: Diagnosis,
Cheezits
- Re: Diagnosis,
eroot
- Re: Diagnosis,
marks542004
- Re: Diagnosis,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Diagnosis,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Diagnosis,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Diagnosis,
chris thompson
- Re: Diagnosis,
rnorman
- Re: Diagnosis,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Diagnosis,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Diagnosis,
Kermit
- Ray's Version of Intelligent Design,
Jessie Ukaine
- Giuen Holding Trust Ltd. Financial Derivatives,
Bank-1.
- Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
administrator
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Rodjk #613
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
eerok
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
TomS
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
John Wilkins
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
eroot
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Shane
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Lee
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Rolf
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Inez
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Kermit
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Cheezits
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
eroot
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Lets come and laugh at the evolutionists!,
Howard
- Darwin Image on Dayton Courthouse,
Greg G.
- The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Uriel
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Boikat
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Harshman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
John Vreeland
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
wf3h
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Woland
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Boikat
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
heekster
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
eroot
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Bob T.
- Re: Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Ye Old One
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
TomS
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
B Richardson
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
heekster
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Augray
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
raven1
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Richard Clayton
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Lee
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Andre Lieven
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
eroot
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
eerok
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Joe Cummings
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Llanzlan Klazmon
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Bob T.
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Inez
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
wf3h
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Boikat
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Cerpin Taxt
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Cheezits
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Cerpin Taxt
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Vend
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Desertphile
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The real father of Evolution was an Atheist,
Robert Carnegie
- Semi off-topic: Anything above a grade 10 education is a waste of,
Daoud
- Bbbbbye-bye?,
dkomo
- Google,
spin..@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Rusty Sites <SpameYouToo@spamex.com> And the News Group 'Talk Origins".,
\(M\)-adman
- The Global Flood,
heekster
- Re: The Global Flood,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Global Flood,
heekster
- Re: The Global Flood,
r norman
- Re: The Global Flood,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Re: The Global Flood,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Global Flood,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Re: The Global Flood,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Global Flood,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Re: The Global Flood,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Global Flood,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
rnorman
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
rnorman
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
heekster
- Re: The Global Flood,
rnorman
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
rnorman
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
wf3h
- Re: The Global Flood,
Mark Isaak
- Re: The Global Flood,
rnorman
- Re: The Global Flood,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
rnorman
- Re: The Global Flood,
Jim Willemin
- Re: The Global Flood,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: The Global Flood,
chris thompson
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
hersheyh
- Re: The Global Flood,
heekster
- Re: The Global Flood,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The Global Flood,
chris thompson
- Re: The Global Flood,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Global Flood,
Mark Isaak
- Re: The Global Flood,
rmcbane
- Re: The Global Flood,
Jim Willemin
- Re: The Global Flood,
Earle Jones
- Re: The Global Flood,
J. J. Lodder
- Debunk this one...,
sheepshaggerx
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Debunk this one...,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Ye Old One
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Jim Lovejoy
- Re: Debunk this one...,
heekster
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Debunk this one...,
raven1
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Mike Painter
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Debunk this one...,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Debunk this one...,
raven1
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Boikat
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Boikat
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Hypatia
- Re: Debunk this one...,
John Harshman
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Cheezits
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Augray
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Debunk this one...,
rmcbane
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Debunk this one...,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Inez
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Boikat
- Re: Debunk this one...,
Boikat
- Re: Debunk this one...,
JTEM
- F.O. Ye Old One Spamming.,
spintronic
- What gives?,
spintronic
- Re: What gives?,
John Harshman
- Re: What gives?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: What gives?,
Woland
- Re: What gives?,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: What gives?,
Inez
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
chris thompson
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
chris thompson
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
Kermit
- Re: What gives?,
John Wilkins
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
John Wilkins
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
John Wilkins
- Re: What gives?,
Don Cates
- Re: What gives?,
John Wilkins
- Re: What gives?,
chris thompson
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
chris thompson
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: What gives?,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: What gives?,
Robert Carnegie
- Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
dkomo
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
dkomo
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
r norman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
dkomo
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
r norman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Vreeland
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
r norman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
heekster
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
r norman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
dkomo
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
r norman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
conrad
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Wilkins
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Wilkins
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Earle Jones
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Harshman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
gregwrld
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Shane
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
dkomo
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
dkomo
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Shane
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Shane
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Wilkins
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
rnorman
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Wilkins
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Hypatia
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Earle Jones
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
John Wilkins
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
Tim Tyler
- Re: Stephen Wolfram vs. Charles Darwin on natural selection,
J. J. Lodder
- News: UCF Speakers Series Tackles Evolution Versus Creationism for Darwin's Anniversary.,
Ye Old One
- News: Emory workshop teaches teachers how to teach evolution.,
Ye Old One
- Notwithstanding Evolution is correct...,
sheepshaggerx
- Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Caranx latus
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
John Vreeland
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
TomS
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
heekster
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Free Lunch
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Free Lunch
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Free Lunch
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
raven1
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
raven1
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
eroot
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
r norman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
r norman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
raven1
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Mark Isaak
- Chez Watt! (was: Re: Evolution of the Brain),
raven1
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Steven L.
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Patashu0
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
heekster
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
eroot
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Woland
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Occidental
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Occidental
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Earle Jones
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
John Wilkins
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
Michael Siemon
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
phillip brown
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
eroot
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
wf3h
- Re: Evolution of the Brain,
rnorman
- Wiki Article on UseNet Notables,
Will in New Haven
- Re: The logic of diseased thinking and 2-Pound quackery in general.,
J666
- Ray Martinez' "Paper",
Earle Jones
- News: The Biological Clock's Incredible Influence Revealed.,
Ye Old One
- News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Mark Schumacher
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Free Lunch
- Re: Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Free Lunch
- Re: Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Free Lunch
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
heekster
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
wf3h
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Lee
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Hypatia
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Lee
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Lee
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Lee
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Lee
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
wf3h
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Hypatia
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Klaus Hellnick
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Hypatia
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Earle Jones
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Lee
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Hypatia
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
wf3h
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
wf3h
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
Bill Hudson
- Re: News: and in further persuit of mindless ignorence...,
heekster
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Strange Creature
- Re: News: Stephen Hawking to retire from prestigious post.,
Bill Hudson
- News: Tiny dinosaur on verge of swearing off meat.,
Ye Old One
- News: Diversity of trees in Ecuador's Amazon rainforest defies simple explanation.,
Ye Old One
- another?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: another?,
r norman
- Re: another?,
Augray
- Re: another?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: another?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: another?,
Steven L.
- Re: another?,
wf3h
- Re: another?,
Boikat
- Re: another?,
squealpiggy
- Re: another?,
heekster
- Re: another?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: another?,
Max
- Re: another?,
Boikat
- SCIENCE??,
spintronic
- Creationists declare war over the brain,
Tim Tyler
- Wait until my paper is released,
Rolf
- A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A List of 10,
rossum
- Re: A List of 10,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Free Lunch
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Caranx latus
- Re: A List of 10,
heekster
- Re: A List of 10,
Free Lunch
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A List of 10,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A List of 10,
wf3h
- Re: A List of 10,
spintronic
- Re: A List of 10,
Prof Weird
- Re: A List of 10,
spintronic
- Re: A List of 10,
Prof Weird
- Re: A List of 10,
Ye Old One
- Re: A List of 10,
Ye Old One
- Re: A List of 10,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A List of 10,
wf3h
- Re: A List of 10,
rossum
- Re: A List of 10,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
rossum
- Re: A List of 10,
TomS
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Cheezits
- Re: A List of 10,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A List of 10,
John Wilkins
- Re: A List of 10,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A List of 10,
Boikat
- Re: A List of 10,
rossum
- Re: A List of 10,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A List of 10,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A List of 10,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A List of 10,
Boikat
- Re: A List of 10,
Earle Jones
- Re: A List of 10,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: A List of 10,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A List of 10,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A List of 10,
Boikat
- Re: A List of 10,
Bob T.
- Chez Watt: A List of 10,
Greg G.
- Re: A List of 10,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Re: A List of 10,
Ye Old One
- Re: A List of 10,
johnethompson2001
- Re: A List of 10,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: A List of 10,
rossum
- Re: A List of 10,
wf3h
- Re: A List of 10,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: A List of 10,
Woland
- Re: A List of 10,
Prof Weird
- Re: A List of 10,
Cheezits
- Re: A List of 10,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: A List of 10,
Boikat
- Re: A List of 10,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A List of 10,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A List of 10,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A List of 10,
Desertphile
- (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Cj
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Boikat
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Boikat
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Ye Old One
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
marque127
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Earle Jones
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
heekster
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Ye Old One
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Earle Jones
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Steve O
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Stephen
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Joe Cummings
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Inez
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Cheezits
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
John Wilkins
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
heekster
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
heekster
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Hypatia
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Cheezits
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Hypatia
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Earle Jones
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Cheezits
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Cj
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
heekster
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Boikat
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Inez
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Inez
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
John Wilkins
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Boikat
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Inez
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Boikat
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Boikat
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
heekster
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Ron O
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
eerok
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
Rusty Sites
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (M)-adman--speed freak, bot, or team?,
heekster
- Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Shebursh
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Shebursh
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Shebursh
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Free Lunch
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Martin Kaletsch
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Max
- Re: Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Ye Old One
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Ye Old One
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
John Wilkins
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
heekster
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
heekster
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Kermit
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
David Canzi
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Cheezits
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Earle Jones
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Nomen Publicus
- Re: Why God and no-God are the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Max
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Shebursh
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Richard Harter
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Cheezits
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Free Lunch
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Max
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Vend
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Kermit
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
John Harshman
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Robert Camp
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
eroot
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: Why God and no-God is the Two Diametrical Ways of Life,
Vend
- The Heavenly Match: A Cosmic Oddity,
sasam2
- The Logic of Ray Martinez,
Jessie Ukaine
- Re: Judaism, Rebellion diguised as Religion (www.grishenkoff.com),
Chris Krolczyk
- Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Seanpit
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Grandbank
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Harshman
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Harshman
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Vend
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Harshman
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
chris thompson
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Harshman
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
TomS
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Ron O
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Harshman
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
hersheyh
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
heekster
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
heekster
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Susan S
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Shane
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
heekster
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Shane
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Vend
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Seanpit
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Rolf
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
Robert Camp
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
hersheyh
- Re: Common Descent non-Falsifiable?,
J. J. Lodder
- DIG: Re: Jews= Darwinists, Atheists, Fascists, Communists,,
Harvest Dancer
- Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ron O
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Shane
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Shane
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Craig Franck
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
murdock
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Rolf
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ron O
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Frank J
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
TomS
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
gregwrld
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Caranx latus
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
wf3h
- Re: Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Wombat
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Frank J
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Frank J
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ernest Major
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Whales are fish?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Whales are fish?,
richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Whales are fish?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Whales are fish?,
Caranx latus
- Re: Whales are fish?,
hersheyh
- Re: Whales are fish?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Whales are fish?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Whales are fish?,
richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Whales are fish?,
Caranx latus
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
TomS
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Wombat
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Wombat
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Rolf
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Caranx latus
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Wilkins
- Listen to your own scholars, evolutionists,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Listen to your own scholars, evolutionists,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
heekster
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
John Harshman
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
heekster
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Steve O
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
hersheyh
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Seanpit
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
_Arthur
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
wf3h
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Joe Cummings
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Vend
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Seanpit
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Frank J
- Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?,
Richard Smol
- The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Inez
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Lee Jay
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Ye Old One
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Earle Jones
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Boikat
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
heekster
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Rodjk #613
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Earle Jones
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Max
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Joe Cummings
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Lee Jay
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Shearwater
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Kermit
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
eerok
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
muhadeeb
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
gregwrld
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Free Lunch
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Inez
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Inez
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Inez
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Inez
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Inez
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Greg Guarino
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Caranx latus
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
John Wilkins
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Caranx latus
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Michael Siemon
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Shane
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
eerok
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
tension_on_the_wire
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
tension_on_the_wire
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
spintronic
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
johnethompson2001
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Cheezits
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mike Franklin
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Ron O
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Ron O
- There are two types of "Debates": Genuine and Jewish,
Amalek
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Ron O
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Ron O
- Che< Watt Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Che< Watt Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Che< Watt Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Louann Miller
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Ron O
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
mike3
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Ron O
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Mark Isaak
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Caranx latus
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
muhadeeb
- Re: The problem with all these "Debates".,
Richard Smol
- Talk.Origins no longer "gone dark" on Verizon servers,
Richard Clayton
- Expelled on Netflix,
LloydBrown
- Re: Jews= Darwin-, Athe-, Fasc-, Commun-, Capital-, Dinosaur-ists,,
Lee
more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Mr tiktaalik
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
chris thompson
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Kermit
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Nomen Publicus
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
north5
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Augray
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
TomS
- Message not available
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
JTEM
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
eroot
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Augray
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Augray
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Augray
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Desertphile
Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
JohnN
Re: more evilutionist lies - feathers,
Desertphile
Re: Please don't feed the troll,
Tiny Bulcher
One God,
\(M\)-adman
Re: A Knotty Problem,
R Brown
Lost for several weeks...has Ray published his paper?,
*Hemidactylus*
Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Dan Luke
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
John Harshman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Dan Luke
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Mark Evans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Josh Hayes
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
John Wilkins
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
heekster
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
wf3h
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
wf3h
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
heekster
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
johnethompson2001
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Dick C
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
heekster
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
wf3h
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
johnethompson2001
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
wf3h
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Mark Evans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Jim Lovejoy
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Dan Luke
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
John Harshman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Vend
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Vend
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Inez
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Rusty Sites
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Inez
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Free Lunch
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Rusty Sites
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Frank J
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Robert Grumbine
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
max maypo
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Paul J Gans
- Re: Derbyshire - "Will Obama Kill Science?",
Desertphile
OT: Evolution, probably the best theory in the world,
Boffin
No Creator? Lets see:,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
wf3h
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Dwib
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Cheezits
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Inez
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Nomen Publicus
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Rusty Sites
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Mark Evans
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
JohnN
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
tgdenning
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Ye Old One
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
heekster
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Rolf
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Mark Evans
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
johnethompson2001
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Mark Evans
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Mark Evans
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Boikat
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Kermit
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
eerok
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Boikat
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Mark Evans
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Mark Evans
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
AC
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
heekster
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Kermit
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Mark Isaak
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
AC
- Re: No Creator? Lets see:,
Tom McDonald
Sock puppets? was Re: The Protocols are fake,
Tiny Bulcher
Did God choose mathematics?,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
geoproc
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Grandbank
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Robert Camp
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
Cj
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
wf3h
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
north5
- Re: Did God choose mathematics?,
J. J. Lodder
Religious Prosociality,
William Morse
Don McLeroy: Biology standards and reasonable doubts,
Jason Spaceman
Liberty University polishes a turd,
Jason Spaceman
In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Earle Jones
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: In the beginning?,
Ye Old One
- Re: In the beginning?,
Vend
- Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Therion Ware
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Frank J
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Frank J
- Re: In the beginning?,
Jack Dominey
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Earle Jones
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Re: In the beginning?,
Ye Old One
- Re: In the beginning?,
Frank J
- Re: Re: In the beginning?,
Ye Old One
- Re: In the beginning?,
Frank J
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Message not available
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Earle Jones
- Message not available
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: Re: In the beginning?,
Ye Old One
- Re: In the beginning?,
heekster
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Ilas
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
heekster
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Patashu0
- Re: In the beginning?,
TomS
- Re: Re: In the beginning?,
Ye Old One
- Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
- Re: In the beginning?,
Earle Jones
- Re: In the beginning?,
Vend
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Shane
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
heekster
- Re: In the beginning?,
heekster
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: In the beginning?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
heekster
- Re: In the beginning?,
Ilas
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Patashu0
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
AC
- Re: In the beginning?,
Nomen Publicus
- Re: Re: In the beginning?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
- Re: In the beginning?,
Ye Old One
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Grandbank
- Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: In the beginning?,
James Beck
Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
Re: In the beginning?,
Vend
Re: In the beginning?,
geoproc
- Re: In the beginning?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
geoproc
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
geoproc
- Re: In the beginning?,
Frank J
- Re: In the beginning?,
Shane
- Re: In the beginning?,
Ernest Major
- Re: In the beginning?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: In the beginning?,
Smoley
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: In the beginning?,
heekster
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
- Re: In the beginning?,
Boikat
Re: In the beginning?,
Frank J
Re: In the beginning?,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Re: In the beginning?,
AC
Ken Ham vs. Karl Giberson,
Jason Spaceman
OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Stuart
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Kermit
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Dragonblaze
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Earle Jones
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Mark Evans
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Max
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Frank J
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Shane
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
raven1
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Bill Hudson
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Re: OT: obama/biden,
Ye Old One
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Earle Jones
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Frank J
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
heekster
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Frank J
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
heekster
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
max maypo
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Greg Guarino
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
raven1
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
max maypo
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
eroot
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Stile4aly
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Earle Jones
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
chris thompson
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
johnethompson2001
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
heekster
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
AC
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
heekster
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Earle Jones
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Paul J Gans
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
heekster
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
eroot
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
wf3h
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Inez
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
Rusty Sites
- Re: OT: obama/biden,
chris thompson
Message not available
Re: OT: obama/biden,
Desertphile
Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
Re: Sean loses interest,
_Arthur
Re: Sean loses interest,
spintronic
Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
wf3h
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
wf3h
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
wf3h
- Re: Sean loses interest,
heekster
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Stuart
- Re: Sean loses interest,
heekster
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Gene Poole
- Examples of Convergent Evolution,
Seanpit
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
Seanpit
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
Seanpit
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
Seanpit
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Examples of Convergent Evolution,
hersheyh
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Eye Evolution,
Seanpit
- Re: Eye Evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Eye Evolution,
Seanpit
- Re: Eye Evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Eye Evolution,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Eye Evolution,
Seanpit
- Re: Eye Evolution,
Rusty Sites
- Old Age of Earth,
Seanpit
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
John Harshman
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
chris thompson
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
John Harshman
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
Seanpit
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
John Harshman
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
Max
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
chris thompson
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
wf3h
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
hersheyh
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
TomS
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
hersheyh
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
John Harshman
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
Seanpit
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
John Harshman
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
Frank J
- Re: Old Age of Earth,
Frank J
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Stuart
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
wf3h
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Seanpit
- Re: Sean loses interest,
hersheyh
- Re: Sean loses interest,
wf3h
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Earle Jones
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Stuart
- Re: Sean loses interest,
r norman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Stuart
- Re: Sean loses interest,
r norman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
r norman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
r norman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
r norman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Sean loses interest,
hersheyh
Re: Sean loses interest,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Sean loses interest,
John Harshman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Sean loses interest,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Stuart
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Sean loses interest,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Sean loses interest,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Sean loses interest,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Sean loses interest,
Dana Tweedy
Re: Sean loses interest,
wf3h
Re: Sean loses interest,
John Stockwell
The Dawkins Magick Bus...,
Therion Ware
Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
raven1
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
raven1
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
raven1
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Earle Jones
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
_Arthur
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Boikat
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
Lee
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
J.J. O'Shea
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Level 1 Defense Mechanisms of the Evolutionist.,
spintronic
Share Your Genes.,
spintronic
Chez Watt: Neanderthal code, My review,
Sapient Fridge
~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Ilas
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Kermit
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
geoproc
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
John Harshman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Kermit
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Rusty Sites
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
John Harshman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
wf3h
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
richardalanforrest
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
richardalanforrest
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Free Lunch
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
geoproc
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Rusty Sites
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
johnethompson2001
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
heekster
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
heekster
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
heekster
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
johnethompson2001
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Isaak
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Isaak
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Isaak
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Richard Smol
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
johnethompson2001
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
johnethompson2001
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cheezits
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Rusty Sites
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Rusty Sites
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Stuart
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Evans
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
johnethompson2001
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
TomS
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
heekster
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
TomS
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Evans
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Kermit
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Wombat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Wombat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Max
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Isaak
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Free Lunch
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mike Painter
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Free Lunch
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Isaak
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
r norman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Isaak
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
johnethompson2001
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mike Painter
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mark Isaak
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
TomS
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Mike Painter
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
TomS
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
heekster
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Jim Willemin
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Stephen
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Stephen
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
johnethompson2001
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
JohnN
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Rusty Sites
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
phillip brown
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Boikat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
phillip brown
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
phillip brown
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Wombat
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
heekster
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
richardalanforrest
- Re: ~Yet MORE Evidence of The Noah Flood~,
phillip brown
Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
Baron Bodissey
Jefferson Teacher in Creationism Controversy Resigns,
Jason Spaceman
Re: The Origins of Halloween,
SkyEyes
T.O. Troll Hypothesis,
Cerpin Taxt
Survey article on abiogenesis,
dkomo
News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Klaus Hellnick
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: News: Volcanoes May Be Original Womb of Life.,
Desertphile
A list of large fossil sites?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
TomS
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
DJT
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
John Harshman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
John Harshman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
John Harshman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
John Harshman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
John Harshman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
John Harshman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
richardalanforrest
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
George
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
heekster
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Boikat
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: A list of large fossil sites?,
heekster
Re: Neanderthal code, My review,
\(M\)-adman
Can we guess what dinosaur lungs were like?,
eroot
News: Doctors get death diagnosis tips.,
Ye Old One
News: 'A dinosaur dance floor'.,
Ye Old One
Re: The Execution and Expropriation of all Jews are Security and,
Tiny Bulcher
Accepted servers,
metspitzer
Re: Re: Why the real holocaust is the only solution of the Jewish Threat,
Ye Old One
Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
Frank J
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
Frank J
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
eroot
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
Nashton
- Re: Do you think?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Do you think?,
Boikat
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
eroot
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
John McKendry
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Ron O
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Inez
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
wf3h
- Re: Do you think?,
Boikat
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
Lee
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Lee
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Boikat
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Lee
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
TomS
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
wf3h
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
wf3h
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
wf3h
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
eroot
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Do you think?,
TomS
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Harshman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
Earle Jones
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
John Wilkins
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
wf3h
- Re: Do you think?,
Grandbank
- Re: Do you think?,
wf3h
- Re: Do you think?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
R Brown
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
James Beck
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
wf3h
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Stuart
- Re: Do you think?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Do you think?,
Boikat
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Do you think?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Do you think?,
spintronic
- Re: Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do you think?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do you think?,
heekster
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Do you think?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Do you think?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Re: Do you think?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Do you think?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Do you think?,
conrad
Totally new theory on evolutionary origins of conservatism and,
robert
News: Geologist who linked cosmic strike to dinosaurs' extinction takes top prize.,
Ye Old One
Haeckel's embryos still alive and kicking.,
Rolf
BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
metspitzer
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Ye Old One
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Rick Brandt
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Hypatia
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Ye Old One
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Hypatia
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Ye Old One
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Hypatia
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Ye Old One
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
eroot
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Frank J
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
TomS
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Wombat
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
John McKendry
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Shane
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Vend
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Ye Old One
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Michael James
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Richard Harter
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Vend
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Ye Old One
- Re: BBC Horizon - The Presidents Guide to Science Part 1/5,
Mike Dworetsky
Re: Jews, Prime Ministers, etc.,
AC
Re: What is Science So Afraid Of?,
Frank J
T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
Augray
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
wf3h
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Augray
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
chris thompson
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Inez
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Inez
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
heekster
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Greg Guarino
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Bob Casanova
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Wombat
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Bill Hudson
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Max
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
johnethompson2001
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Inez
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
AC
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
heekster
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
John Wilkins
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Shane
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
John Wilkins
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Susan S
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Louann Miller
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
chris thompson
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Louann Miller
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
heekster
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
heekster
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
eroot
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
eroot
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
heekster
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
eroot
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Ye Old One
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Cj
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Boikat
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Boikat
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Ye Old One
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Boikat
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Boikat
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Shearwater
- Re: Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Ye Old One
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Bob Casanova
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Bill Hudson
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Frank J
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
James Beck
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Max
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Susan S
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
geoproc
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
r norman
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
AC
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
Ye Old One
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Ray Martinez
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
eroot
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
Shane
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
David Iain Greig
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
David Iain Greig
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
Bob Casanova
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Frank J
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru 11-17-08,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: T.O. RECOMENDED KILLFILE List HAS ARRIVED for 10-17-08 thru,
Robert Carnegie
News: Judge has thrown out a case against God.,
Ye Old One
Christian Anti-Semitism (was Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the),
AC
Re: Paging DIG: Re: Jews, Prime Ministers, etc.,
AC
- Re: Paging DIG: Re: Jews, Prime Ministers, etc.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Paging DIG: Re: Jews, Prime Ministers, etc.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Paging DIG: Re: Jews, Prime Ministers, etc.,
Friar Broccoli
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Paging DIG: Re: Jews, Prime Ministers, etc.,
Tiny Bulcher
Miller/Urey revisited.,
Vipera berus
test,
Dick C.
OT: Advice for a 2-week old child,
Frank J
Re: Raven1 fails to show that Pagano is Anti-Science,
Stephan Schulz
BBC Radio 4 - Vitalism,
Howard
Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Dragonblaze
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Lee
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Nashton
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
wf3h
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Inez
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cheezits
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cheezits
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cheezits
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
r norman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
r norman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cheezits
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cheezits
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Joe Cummings
- Re: Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Ye Old One
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
heekster
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Steven L.
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
r norman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
heekster
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
heekster
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
r norman
- Re: Getting closer to abiogenesis,
Mark Isaak
Discover The Essence of Your Life Here,
Essence of Life
Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
chris thompson
- Re: Defination of evolution,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Defination of evolution,
chris thompson
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
AC
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Defination of evolution,
John Wilkins
- Re: Defination of evolution,
r norman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Defination of evolution,
r norman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
John Wilkins
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Mike Painter
- Re: Defination of evolution,
heekster
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Defination of evolution,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Lee
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Boony
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Defination of evolution,
chris thompson
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Defination of evolution,
heekster
- Re: Defination of evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Defination of evolution,
heekster
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Defination of evolution,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Defination of evolution,
snex
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Dick C.
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Cj
- Re: Defination of evolution,
heekster
- Re: Defination of evolution,
raven1
- Re: Defination of evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Defination of evolution,
AC
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Cj
- Re: Defination of evolution,
Cj
Re: Pretty cool eh?,
John McKendry
Into The Jungle,
conrad
Re: No Jews= No Taxes, Public or Interest Loans, Fiat Money or,
Frank J
Chez Watt! (was Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the),
AC
Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
John Harshman
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
John Wilkins
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Greg Esres
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
_Arthur
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Reentrant
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Inez
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Mark Evans
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
spintronic
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
John Harshman
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
John Harshman
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Craig Franck
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Llanzlan Klazmon
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
TomS
- Potential Problems with anit-Anthropic Arguments,
Seanpit
- Re: Universal constants, multiverses, finetuning, etc.,
Vend
“Other half” of Darwin’s theory pas,
Jeffrey Turner
Re: The Constitution of the Kingdom of God (www.grishenkoff.com),
XaurreauX
Re: Give your money to the PMOTKOG,
Bill Hudson
Re: Chromosomes and Pyramids,
Greg Guarino
Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
jspaceman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
A.Carlson
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Stuart
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
heekster
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
John Wilkins
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
AC
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
AC
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
AC
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
AC
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Painter
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
heekster
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Painter
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
heekster
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Rodjk #613
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Nashton
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ron O
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ron O
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ron O
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
heekster
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Louann Miller
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Earle Jones
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ye Old One
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Painter
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
wf3h
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
AC
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
AC
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
AC
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
John Wilkins
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Boikat
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ye Old One
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Desertphile
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Ron O
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
jspaceman
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Stephen
- Re: Texas: Creationists appointed to review curriculum,
Desertphile
What's in a Name?,
Will in New Haven
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Caranx latus
- Re: What's in a Name?,
r norman
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Stile4aly
- Re: What's in a Name?,
heekster
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Patashu0
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: What's in a Name?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Kermit
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Susan S
- Re: What's in a Name?,
heekster
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Caranx latus
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: What's in a Name?,
heekster
- Re: What's in a Name?,
chris thompson
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Kermit
- Re: What's in a Name?,
chris thompson
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Caranx latus
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Will in New Haven
- Re: What's in a Name?,
heekster
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Frank J
- Re: What's in a Name?,
Frank J
Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Rolf
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
geoproc
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Caranx latus
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Stile4aly
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Stile4aly
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Desertphile
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Caranx latus
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Caranx latus
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Therion Ware
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
geoproc
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
TomS
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Inez
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Ilas
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
raven1
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Desertphile
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Frank J
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Rolf
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Desertphile
- Re: Shhhhh - Ray is working on The Paper!,
Inez
The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Caranx latus
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Grandbank
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Cory Albrecht
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Mark Evans
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Inez
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Inez
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Inez
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Mark Evans
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Bill Hudson
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Shane
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
wf3h
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
wf3h
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Shane
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Shane
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Shane
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Shane
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
heekster
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Boikat
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Boikat
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ron O
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ron O
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
TomS
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
chris thompson
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
chris thompson
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Boikat
- Re: Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ye Old One
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Cory Albrecht
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Cory Albrecht
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Boikat
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
raven1
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Boikat
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
raven1
- Re: Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ye Old One
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
heekster
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Ron O
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
Inez
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
John Stockwell
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
XaurreauX
- Re: The Philosphical Side of ---Adman--- (part 1),
raven1
Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Lee Jay
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
raven1
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Caranx latus
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Inez
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
James Beck
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Augray
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Augray
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Augray
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Augray
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Augray
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Inez
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Augray
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Inez
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
hersheyh
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
chris thompson
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Ye Old One
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
brich
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
RAM
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
hersheyh
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
hersheyh
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
r norman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
spintronic
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
hersheyh
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
zob95
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Inez
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Boikat
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
Max
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
chris thompson
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
John Harshman
- Re: Dating methods REVISTED for Harshman and Spintronic,
John Stockwell
seanpit, granite blocks and SETI,
wf3h
OT and Funny!,
heekster
Re: The Constitution of the Kingdom of God published on,
Startlemyerfieldson
CHEZ WATT: Re MY Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Jessie Ukaine
I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Caranx latus
- Re: I Think,
Boikat
- Re: I Think,
chris thompson
- Re: I Think,
Stephen Wolstenholme
- Re: I Think,
TomS
- Re: I Think,
John Harshman
- Re: I Think,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: I Think,
Mark Evans
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
Greg Guarino
- Re: I Think,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: I Think,
Erwin Moller
- Re: I Think,
wf3h
- Re: I Think,
Kermit
- Re: I Think,
Dwib
- Re: I Think,
Timberwoof
- Re: I Think,
raven1
- Re: I Think,
Thurisaz the Einherjer
- Re: I Think,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
wf3h
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
Bill Hudson
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Bill Hudson
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Shane
- Re: I Think,
Bill Hudson
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
Lee
- Re: I Think,
Shane
- Re: I Think,
Shane
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
Shane
- Re: I Think,
chris thompson
- Re: I Think,
Nick Keighley
- Re: I Think,
John Wilkins
- Re: I Think,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: I Think,
Cubist
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
chris thompson
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
Bill Hudson
- Re: I Think,
chris thompson
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Bill Hudson
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: I Think,
heekster
- Re: I Think,
Nick Keighley
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
raven1
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
johnethompson2001
- Re: I Think,
raven1
- Re: I Think,
Cerpin Taxt
- Re: I Think,
TomS
- Re: I Think,
heekster
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
Lee
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
wf3h
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
wf3h
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
wf3h
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
wf3h
- Re: I Think,
Lee
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Lee
- Re: I Think,
Caranx latus
- Re: I Think,
Lee
- Re: I Think,
Rolf
- Re: I Think,
Sleepalot
- Re: I Think,
Lee
- Re: I Think,
Sleepalot
- Re: I Think,
John Wilkins
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
John Wilkins
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: I Think,
Earle Jones
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
Sleepalot
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
Sleepalot
- Re: I Think,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: I Think,
Rolf
- Re: I Think,
Ye Old One
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
heekster
- Re: I Think,
Free Lunch
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Free Lunch
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Free Lunch
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Bill Hudson
- Re: I Think,
Stuart
- Re: I Think,
Max
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Free Lunch
- Re: I Think,
heekster
- Re: I Think,
Free Lunch
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
r norman
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
heekster
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
Bob Casanova
- Re: I Think,
raven1
- Re: I Think,
Bill Hudson
- Re: I Think,
Desertphile
Big bang; Science and Religion.,
socratus
My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Ilas
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Ron O
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
r norman
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Occidental
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Dwib
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Inez
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
raven1
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
johnethompson2001
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
spintronic
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Vend
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Patashu0
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Ray Martinez
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Ye Old One
- Re: My Top 100 Craziest Loons,
Frank J
Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Boikat
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
The Pooflinger
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Lee Jay
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Shane
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Desertphile
- Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Free Lunch
- Winner: Re: Chez Watt Ballot October 13, 2008,
Harvest Dancer
Nashton,
heekster
- Re: Nashton,
Nashton
- Re: Nashton,
Boikat
- Re: Nashton,
Nashton
- Re: Nashton,
raven1
- Re: Nashton,
Timberwoof
- Re: Nashton,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Nashton,
Nashton
- Re: Nashton,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Re: Nashton,
Ye Old One
- Re: Nashton,
Boikat
- Re: Nashton,
Nashton
- Re: Nashton,
heekster
- Re: Nashton,
Ye Old One
- Re: Nashton,
heekster
- Re: Nashton,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Nashton,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Nashton,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Nashton,
Dan Luke
- Re: Re: Nashton,
Ye Old One
- Re: Nashton,
John McKendry
- Re: Nashton,
Shane
- Re: Nashton,
John McKendry
- Re: Nashton,
Shane
- Re: Nashton,
John McKendry
- Re: Nashton,
Shane
- Re: Nashton,
Nashton
- Re: Nashton,
Shane
- Re: Nashton,
Nashton
- Re: Nashton,
Shane
- Re: Nashton,
G
- Re: Nashton,
chris thompson
- Re: Nashton,
G
- Re: Nashton,
heekster
- Re: Nashton,
Nashton
Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the nearest,
\(M\)-adman
Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the,
eroot
- Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the,
\(M\)-adman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the,
Paul J Gans
- Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: There will be no Jews on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in the,
Nashton
Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
Jim Willemin
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Nashton
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Nashton
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Nashton
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
John Harshman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
John Harshman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Nashton
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
heekster
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Nashton
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
r norman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
r norman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
raven1
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
r norman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
heekster
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Jim Willemin
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
_Arthur
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
_Arthur
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Boikat
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
raven1
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
John McKendry
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
heekster
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
heekster
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong,
Mark Evans
- Re: Evidence of Man in America long before pyramids. [more wrong dating by science],
Ye Old One
expelled torrent,
Ritsjoena
Request for corrections of POTM presentations,
Friar Broccoli
Question for Ray,
Rolf
- Re: Question for Ray,
spintronic
- Re: Question for Ray,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Question for Ray,
Boikat
- Re: Question for Ray,
spintronic
- Re: Question for Ray,
Boikat
- Re: Question for Ray,
KlausH
- Re: Question for Ray,
hersheyh
- Re: Question for Ray,
Frank J
- Re: Question for Ray,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Question for Ray,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Question for Ray,
Cj
- Re: Question for Ray,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Question for Ray,
John Wilkins
- Re: Question for Ray,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Question for Ray,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Question for Ray,
Boikat
- Re: Question for Ray,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Question for Ray,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Question for Ray,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Question for Ray,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Question for Ray,
Boikat
- Re: Question for Ray,
Cj
- Re: Question for Ray,
Boikat
- Re: Question for Ray,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Question for Ray,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Question for Ray,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Question for Ray,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Question for Ray,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Question for Ray,
Boikat
- Re: Question for Ray,
Rolf
- Re: Question for Ray,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Question for Ray,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Question for Ray,
Rolf
- Re: Question for Ray,
Ray Martinez
Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
spintronic
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Vend
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Frank J
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Frank J
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Frank J
- Re: Your opinion please.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Mike Painter
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
raven1
- Re: Re: Your opinion please.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Frank J
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Your opinion please.,
TomS
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Shane
- Re: Your opinion please.,
heekster
- Re: Your opinion please.,
north5
- Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
heekster
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
Caranx latus
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Your opinion please.,
Desertphile
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Therion Ware
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Kermit
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Boikat
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Rolf
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
spintronic
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
spintronic
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
raven1
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
heekster
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
spintronic
- Re: Your opinion please.,
spintronic
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Lee
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Frank J
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Harshman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
spintronic
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Harshman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Harshman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Harshman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
wf3h
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Wilkins
- Re: Your opinion please.,
chris thompson
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Harshman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
wf3h
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Harshman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Bob Berger
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Your opinion please.,
spintronic
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
raven1
- Re: Your opinion please.,
heekster
- Re: Your opinion please.,
wf3h
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Harshman
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Vend
- Re: Your opinion please.,
David Canzi
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Timberwoof
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Shane
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Your opinion please.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Nashton
- Re: Your opinion please.,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Ron O
- Re: Your opinion please.,
raven1
- Re: Your opinion please.,
Steven L.
- Re: Your opinion please.,
John Stockwell
Economics: An Opportunity for ID “Science”?,
Frank J
There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500 AD,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500 AD,
John Vreeland
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500 AD,
David Canzi
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
JohnN
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500 AD,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Frank J
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Kermit
- Message not available
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Tiny Bulcher
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
TomS
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
r norman
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
dali_70
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
TomS
- Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Frank J
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500 AD,
\(M\)-adman
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
Kermit
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500 AD,
Lee
Re: There were 6 million people on Earth, the Kingdom of God, in 1500,
richardalanforrest
Re: Man in the Moon,
\(M\)-adman
Brunswick candidates offer stances on creationism,
Jason Spaceman
Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
conrad
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
TomS
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Prof Weird
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Inez
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Charles Brenner
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Max
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Hypatia
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Hypatia
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Cerpin Taxt
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Mark Evans
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
chris thompson
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
David Scarlett
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Greg Guarino
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
spintronic
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Boikat
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
wf3h
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Dave Oldridge
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Nashton
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
John Vreeland
- Re: admans Carbondating paradox.,
Puppet_Sock
Fucktard Creationist's archaeopteryx claims,
Desertphile
Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
wf3h
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
wf3h
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
wf3h
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
hersheyh
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
hersheyh
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
wf3h
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
heekster
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Grandbank
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
hersheyh
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
hersheyh
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Seanpit
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
hersheyh
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
hersheyh
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
hersheyh
- Re: Information the result of "Chemistry"?,
_Arthur
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Gene Poole
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Gene Poole
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Message not available
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
heekster
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ye Old One
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Gene Poole
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
John Stockwell
- Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Seanpit
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
wf3h
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Seanpit
- Message not available
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Seanpit
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Seanpit
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Seanpit
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
wf3h
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Robert Camp
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
wf3h
- My Theory of ID,
Seanpit
- Re: My Theory of ID,
wf3h
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Seanpit
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: My Theory of ID,
wf3h
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Seanpit
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Cheezits
- Re: My Theory of ID,
John Stockwell
- Re: My Theory of ID,
wf3h
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Seanpit
- Re: My Theory of ID,
heekster
- Re: My Theory of ID,
wf3h
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Seanpit
- Re: My Theory of ID,
heekster
- Re: My Theory of ID,
wf3h
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Boikat
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Seanpit
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Free Lunch
- Re: Re: My Theory of ID,
Ye Old One
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Free Lunch
- Re: Re: My Theory of ID,
Ye Old One
- Re: My Theory of ID,
richardalanforrest
- Chez Wat nom,
Seanpit
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Boikat
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Seanpit
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Boikat
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Seanpit
- Re: Re: Chez Wat nom,
Ye Old One
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Boikat
- SETI a "hypothesis" - not a "theory",
Seanpit
- Re: SETI a "hypothesis" - not a "theory",
Boikat
- Re: SETI a "hypothesis" - not a "theory",
Seanpit
- Re: SETI a "hypothesis" - not a "theory",
Boikat
- Re: SETI a "hypothesis" - not a "theory",
wf3h
- Re: SETI a "hypothesis" - not a "theory",
heekster
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Ye Old One
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Seanpit
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Ye Old One
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Seanpit
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Josh Hayes
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Earle Jones
- Re: Re: Chez Wat nom,
Ye Old One
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Jim Lovejoy
- The ID Equivalent,
Seanpit
- Re: The ID Equivalent,
Cheezits
- Re: The ID Equivalent,
wf3h
- Re: The ID Equivalent,
Earle Jones
- Re: The ID Equivalent,
John Stockwell
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
wf3h
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
heekster
- Re: Chez Wat nom,
Earle Jones
- Re: My Theory of ID,
wf3h
- Re: My Theory of ID,
hersheyh
- Re: My Theory of ID,
wf3h
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Boikat
- Re: My Theory of ID,
heekster
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Cheezits
- Re: My Theory of ID,
Robert Camp
- My View of God,
Seanpit
- Re: My View of God,
wf3h
- Re: My View of God,
heekster
- Re: My View of God,
Hypatia
- Re: My View of God,
Seanpit
- Re: My View of God,
Seanpit
- Re: My View of God,
wf3h
- Re: My View of God,
Robert Camp
- Re: My View of God,
Seanpit
- Re: My View of God,
hersheyh
- Re: My View of God,
Seanpit
- Re: My View of God,
Robert Camp
- Re: My View of God,
Seanpit
- Re: My View of God,
Sapient Fridge
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Seanpit
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
John Stockwell
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
wf3h
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Seanpit
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
wf3h
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Gene Poole
- Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Stuart
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
heekster
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Ye Old One
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
carlip-nospam
- Definition of Functional Complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
John Stockwell
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
Gene Poole
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
Stuart
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
Gene Poole
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Definition of Functional Complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Reentrant
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Gene Poole
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Mike Painter
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Seanpit
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
hersheyh
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Snowflake Complexity?,
Don Cates
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
heekster
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
DJT
- Re: Trying to Falsify a non-scientific theory?,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Rolf
Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Max
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
heekster
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Seanpit
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
DJT
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
DJT
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
wf3h
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Wombat
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Earle Jones
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
DJT
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
DJT
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ye Old One
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
DJT
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Wombat
Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Max
Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Frank J
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Frank J
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
hersheyh
- Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Dana Tweedy
Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
conrad
Re: Seanpit, ID and complexity,
Steven L.
Another batch of really good YouTube videos debunking creationism...,
Cygnus X-1
Chez Watt: Which is it?,
Ernest Major
Re: Which is it?,
conrad
Exactly how do Americans view the scientific community? Answered!,
\(M\)-adman
Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you, very little!],
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
Chris Krolczyk
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you, very little!],
heekster
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
John Harshman
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
Stuart
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
John Harshman
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
heekster
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
William Morse
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,,
Steven L.
- Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you, very little!],
Mike Painter
The funny thing about science is:,
\(M\)-adman
The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
SkyEyes
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Mike Painter
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Michael Siemon
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Greg G.
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
JohnN
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
David Iain Greig
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Matt Silberstein
- Message not available
- Oi! Hasn't this git been banned?,
Tiny Bulcher
- Jews Stole the Covenant of God with Humanity (www.grishenkoff.com),
Amalek
- Re: Jews Stole the Covenant of God with Humanity (www.grishenkoff.com),
Boikat
- Re: Jews Stole the Covenant of God with Humanity (www.grishenkoff.com),
Walter Bushell
- Re: Oi! Hasn't this git been banned?,
*Hemidactylus*
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
*Hemidactylus*
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Matt Silberstein
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
eroot
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Timberwoof
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
- Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Desertphile
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
R Brown
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
David Iain Greig
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Re: Earth (the Kingdom of God) was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
David Iain Greig
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Timberwoof
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
David Iain Greig
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Ye Old One
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
TomS
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Earle Jones
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
heekster
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Earle Jones
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Devils Advocaat
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
John Wilkins
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
David Iain Greig
- Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Don Cates
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Judeocracy v Democracy (www.grishenkoff.com),
Chris Krolczyk
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
r norman
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Ye Old One
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: God gave the Law to Noah on Ararat on 27.02.0601 AD (His Kingdom),
Tiny Bulcher
Re: God gave the Law to Noah on Ararat on 27.02.0601 AD (His Kingdom),
r norman
Re: God gave the Law to Noah on Ararat on 27.02.0601 AD (His Kingdom),
Walter Bushell
Re: God gave the Law to Noah on Ararat on 27.02.0601 AD (His Kingdom),
Tom McDonald
Re: God gave the Law to Noah on Ararat on 27.02.0601 AD (His Kingdom),
*Hemidactylus*
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Walter Bushell
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Ye Old One
God told Noah to build the Ark on 10.02.0601 AD (His Kingdom),
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
Re: God told Noah to build the Ark on 10.02.0600 AD (His Kingdom),
Prime Minister of the Kingdom of God
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Paul J Gans
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
AC
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Devils Advocaat
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
The Pooflinger
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
eroot
Message not available
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Robert J. Kolker
Re: The World was created on 01.01.0001, 2008 years ago,
Steven L.
OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
jspaceman
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
spintronic
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Ron O
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Caranx latus
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
heekster
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
heekster
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
John Vreeland
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Ron O
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
wf3h
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Frank J
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Frank J
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Frank J
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
John Vreeland
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Frank J
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Frank J
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Caranx latus
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Platytude
- Re: OneNewsNow: Darwinists in denial?,
Frank J
Evolution in Action?,
ts
Chez Watts Re: In the News: Tenn. AG: No constitutional concerns,
Dean Chesterman
Re: What is the Difference?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Timberwoof
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
heekster
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Timberwoof
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Bill
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Bill
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Frank J
- Re: What is the Difference?,
Frank J
- Re: What is the Difference?,
\(M\)-adman
Thread splitting,
chris thompson
What do we get for our money?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Boikat
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Rick
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
chris thompson
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
David Canzi
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
heekster
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Lee Jay
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Bob Casanova
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Frank J
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Kermit
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What do we get for our money?,
Mark Evans
The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Kermit
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
gregwrld
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Dwib
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Timberwoof
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Desertphile
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Mike Duffy
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Kermit
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Timberwoof
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Timberwoof
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
carlip-nospam
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
carlip-nospam
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Earle Jones
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Timberwoof
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Earle Jones
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
carlip-nospam
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
noctiluca
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Desertphile
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Timberwoof
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Timberwoof
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Desertphile
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
heekster
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
J. J. Lodder
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Earle Jones
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Timberwoof
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Desertphile
- Re: The forces inherent in energy,
Joseph Humming
News: "Daisy Chains" of Fossil Creatures Found in China.,
Ye Old One
News: Microscope shows first hours of developing embryo.,
Ye Old One
More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Kermit
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
johnethompson2001
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
heekster
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
chris thompson
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
chris thompson
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
KlausH
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Nashton
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bruce Stephens
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Max
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Nashton
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Free Lunch
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Nashton
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Free Lunch
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
heekster
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Nashton
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Nashton
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Boikat
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
heekster
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Boikat
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Nashton
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
heekster
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
johnethompson2001
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
johnethompson2001
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Hypatia
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Boikat
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Boikat
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
r norman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Craig Franck
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
raven1
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Jim Willemin
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Jim Willemin
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
zob95
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Joe Cummings
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
eduart wolf
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
wf3h
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Ymir
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Dwib
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
James Beck
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
James Beck
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Max
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
James Beck
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
James Beck
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Nashton
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Dwib
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Bob Casanova
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
johnethompson2001
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Ye Old One
- Re: More Scientific Blunders,
Shane
Ken Ham meets 'Bethany Davis',
jspaceman
Hands Up.,
spintronic
Turtles,
Rodjk #613
The Shell you say,
TheBicyclingGuitarist
News: Scientists meet for alien summit.,
Ye Old One
News: Scientists find key protein helps people hear.,
Ye Old One
News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: News: Scientists map genomes of two malaria parasites.,
spintronic
News: Glowing praise: Nobel awarded for fluorescent jellyfish protein.,
Ye Old One
News: Score One for Open Access.,
Ye Old One
As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Caranx latus
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Caranx latus
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Caranx latus
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Max
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
John Harshman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
John Harshman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Bob Casanova
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Message not available
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Caranx latus
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Ken Aaker
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
John Harshman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
johnethompson2001
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Ernest Major
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Ernest Major
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Ernest Major
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Ernest Major
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Don Cates
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
John McKendry
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Message not availableRe: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Michael Siemon
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Message not availableRe: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Free Lunch
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Free Lunch
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Shane
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
\(M\)-adman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Kleuskes & Moos
Message not availableRe: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
r norman
Re: As the Crow flies.,
chris thompson
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: As the Crow flies.,
chris thompson
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Garamond Lethe
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Bob Casanova
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Robert Carnegie
Re: As the Crow flies.,
Dwib
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: As the Crow flies.,
spintronic
News: The Color of Evolution: How One Fish Became Two Fish.,
Ye Old One
When Alternate Theories Don’t Make For A Good Curr,
jspaceman
Re: NHPs produced without CD,
Greg Guarino
Re: OT Tangent: Debating Imbeciles,
\(M\)-adman
"The Scientist at Work",
Caranx latus
The Bible Debunked - Who Really Killed Jesus? ( 1 of 5 ),
metspitzer
Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
Baron Bodissey
- Re: Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Busted.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Busted.,
Lee Jay
- Re: Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
Stuart
- Re: Busted.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Busted.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Busted.,
Lee Jay
- Re: Busted.,
chris thompson
- Re: Busted.,
Boikat
- Re: Busted.,
chris thompson
- Re: Busted.,
Boikat
- Re: Busted.,
chris thompson
- Re: Busted.,
Max
- Re: Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
_Arthur
- Re: Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
_Arthur
- Re: Re: Busted.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
_Arthur
- Re: Busted.,
chris thompson
- Re: Re: Busted.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Busted.,
Max
- Re: Busted.,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Busted.,
Mark Evans
- Re: Busted.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Busted.,
wf3h
- Re: Busted.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Busted.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Busted.,
Boikat
- Re: Busted.,
spintronic
- Re: Busted.,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Busted.,
Max
- Re: Busted.,
Max
- Re: Busted.,
johnethompson2001
Note to Ray M.,
Earle Jones
Re: I am attacked by those who cant read what i write,
Joe Cummings
Blog: Fungus Opera,
Ye Old One
News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
chris thompson
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Jim Willemin
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
John Wilkins
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
r norman
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
John Wilkins
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
r norman
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
r norman
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
heekster
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
John Wilkins
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
r norman
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Walter Bushell
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
r norman
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Paul J Gans
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Ken Shackleton
- Message not available
- Re: News: 'Deepest ever' living fish filmed.,
Desertphile
News: Gene discovery may help hunt for blindness cure.,
Ye Old One
Feathered Crocodiles.,
Strange Creature
No biologists in biology curriculum,
Stephen
Toodles!,
Ferrous Patella
Re: (IVÁN): ABRAHAM AND ISAAC,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
News: What Drives Evolution?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Ray Martinez
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Ernest Major
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Boikat
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Boikat
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Max
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Boikat
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
chris thompson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Boikat
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Bill Hudson
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: News: What Drives Evolution?,
J. J. Lodder
News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Woland
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
heekster
- Re: Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
John McKendry
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
geoproc
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
johnethompson2001
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Ye Old One
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
spintronic
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: News: Evolution is complete: so where do we go from here?,
Steven L.
Re: Re: reply to scoffers: the moon does rotate on its axis,
Ye Old One
NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
snex
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
Stuart
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
Stuart
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
heekster
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
Caranx latus
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
AC
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
Louann Miller
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
Ye Old One
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
Earle Jones
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
heekster
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
Boikat
- Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
LloydBrown
- Message not available
Re: NY Times: King David's Palace Is Found,
*Hemidactylus*
King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
snex
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
snex
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
spintronic
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Stuart
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Stuart
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Inez
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
heekster
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
eroot
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
wf3h
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Boikat
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Ernest Major
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Desertphile
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Shane
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Shane
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Stuart
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Boikat
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
johnethompson2001
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Boikat
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
heekster
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
spintronic
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Charlie Siegrist
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Jim Willemin
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
zob95
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Boikat
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Jim Willemin
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
zob95
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
zob95
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
spintronic
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Boikat
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Desertphile
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Boikat
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Boikat
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Will in New Haven
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Desertphile
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
Cory Albrecht
- Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed,
JohnN
The 'emperor' is still naked,
hersheyh
which bible is that ?,
Mr tiktaalik
- Re: which bible is that ?,
Vend
- Re: which bible is that ?,
Desertphile
- Re: which bible is that ?,
jcon
- Re: which bible is that ?,
r norman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
jcon
- Re: which bible is that ?,
r norman
- Message not available
- Re: which bible is that ?,
r norman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
r norman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
Boikat
- Re: which bible is that ?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
r norman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
r norman
- Re: which bible is that ?,
SkyEyes
- Re: which bible is that ?,
Boikat
Re: which bible is that ?,
Nomen Publicus
Natural Selection, Poker Tournaments, Science Education,
tgdenning
Re: Question about Chromosome #2,
John Vreeland
Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book,
John Vreeland
Sexual selection and melanin preference,
conrad
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
John Vreeland
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
r norman
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Woland
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
tgdenning
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Occidental
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
tgdenning
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Occidental
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Woland
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Vend
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Occidental
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Vend
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Occidental
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Vend
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Woland
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Vend
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Inez
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
William Morse
- Re: Sexual selection and melanin preference,
Strange Creature
On The Origins Of People, Mr. Obama Get Started, Now!,
flexgonzaga
- Re: On The Origins Of People, Mr. Obama Get Started, Now!,
r norman
- Re: On The Origins Of People, Mr. Obama Get Started, Now!,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: On The Origins Of People, Mr. Obama Get Started, Now!,
Desertphile
- Re: On The Origins Of People, Mr. Obama Get Started, Now!,
flexgonzaga
- Re: On The Origins Of People, Mr. Obama Get Started, Now!,
flexgonzaga
- Re: On The Origins Of People, Mr. Obama Get Started, Now!,
flexgonzaga
The Divine Blog,
heekster
Re: reply to scoffers: the moon does rotate on its axis,
Tiny Bulcher
God's Utility Function,
Tim Tyler
OT: BBC radio comment on Biden-Palin debate,
Robert Carnegie
570m-year-old fossil tracks found,
Boony
Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
rossum
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Shane
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
rossum
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Desertphile
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Stuart
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Ruby Moon
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Bob Casanova
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Re: (m)adman's lies -->EXPOSED,
Ye Old One
- Re: (m)adman's lies -->EXPOSED,
r norman
- Re: Re: (m)adman's lies -->EXPOSED,
Ye Old One
- Re: (m)adman's lies -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: (m)adman's lies -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: (m)adman's lies -->EXPOSED,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Re: (m)adman's lies -->EXPOSED,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Augray
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Desertphile
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
spintronic
- Re: Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Ye Old One
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Mike Painter
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
richardalanforrest
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
richardalanforrest
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
richardalanforrest
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Stuart
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Seanpit
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
richardalanforrest
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Seanpit
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
richardalanforrest
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
James Beck
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Max
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Boikat
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Max
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
Max
- Re: The Geologic Column -->EXPOSED,
johnethompson2001
Never miss an opportunity to discuss WHEN things occurred.,
Frank J
And at the end of the Triassic, it's dinosaurs 1, archosaurs 0,
William Morse
- Re: And at the end of the Triassic, it's dinosaurs 1, archosaurs,
John Harshman
- Message not available
- Re: And at the end of the Triassic, it's dinosaurs 1, archosaurs 0,
William Morse
- Re: And at the end of the Triassic, it's dinosaurs 1, archosaurs 0,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: And at the end of the Triassic, it's dinosaurs 1, archosaurs 0,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: And at the end of the Triassic, it's dinosaurs 1, archosaurs 0,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: And at the end of the Triassic, it's dinosaurs 1, archosaurs 0,
Kermit
In the Blink of an Eye,
Charlie Siegrist
Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
adman
- Re: Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
Ye Old One
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
John Wilkins
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
Bob Casanova
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
John Wilkins
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
heekster
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
Shane
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
John Wilkins
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
heekster
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
Boikat
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
Dan Drake
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
John Wilkins
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
heekster
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
Stuart
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
chris thompson
- Re: Food for Thought [eat until you are full],
Susan S
EINSTEIN'S PROOF OF THE 12 GODS OF EGYPT,
George Hammond
Re: Paging Spintronic,
spintronic
A simple example of an evolutionary tree for SpinTronic,
Friar Broccoli
Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Jason Spaceman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Paul Ciszek
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
The Enigmatic One
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Joe Cummings
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Jim Lovejoy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Stuart
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Woland
- Re: Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Stuart
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Stuart
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Rolf
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Woland
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
A.Carlson
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
James Beck
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
James Beck
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Stuart
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
carlip-nospam
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
heekster
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Stuart
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Stuart
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
heekster
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
carlip-nospam
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
heekster
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Rolf
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
David Hare-Scott
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
snex
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Patashu0
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
heekster
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Shane
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Stuart
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
raven1
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Dana Tweedy
Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ron O
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Caranx latus
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
DJT
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ye Old One
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Cj
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
heekster
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Caranx latus
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
snex
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Woland
- Ray Rant's and runs....,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Boikat
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
wf3h
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Cj
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
heekster
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Cj
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: Kook: A New Generation of Scientists Turning Against Evolution,
heekster
News: Evolution Lesson Raises Questions.,
Ye Old One
Blog: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an Atheist).,
Ye Old One
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an Atheist).,
Mike Painter
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an Atheist).,
adman
- Re: Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an Atheist).,
Ye Old One
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
wf3h
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
Shane
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
Boikat
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
Shane
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
heekster
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
Boikat
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
richardalanforrest
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
wf3h
- Re: Blame Creationism! (Or: How a Nutjob at a Debate Made Me Into an,
Robert Carnegie
Blog: Evolution versus Creationism.,
Ye Old One
News: Mysterious Snippets of DNA Withstand Eons of Evolution.,
Ye Old One
News: Reproducing early and often is the key to rapid evolution in plants.,
Ye Old One
News: Fed court sides with UC in evolution site dispute.,
Ye Old One
Re: Food for Thought,
Frank J
Re: ~~The Truth About Lies.~~,
Startlemyerfieldson
Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception,
TomS
Re: News: Do We Live in a Giant Cosmic Bubble?,
Boikat
Chez Watt was: More flood evidence,
heekster
Chez Watt: was More flood evidence,
heekster
AiG defends Palin,
jspaceman
Passion Parties by Mindy (919) 798-0154,
mindy
Ohio teacher's hearing to begin,
TomS
OT: an evolutionary dead end for spam?,
Robert Carnegie
Re: Evolution is not a fact,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Frank J
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
John Wilkins
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Caranx latus
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
John Wilkins
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Cj
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Ouroboros_Rex
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Frank J
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
chris thompson
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
adman
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Frank J
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
daenku32
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
John Wilkins
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
heekster
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Krubozumo Nyankoye
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Frank J
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
heekster
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
adman
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Tom McDonald
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Inez
- Re: Life is just a bowl of cherries.,
Earle Jones
Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Frank J
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Boikat
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
TomS
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
hersheyh
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Max
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
noctiluca
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
wf3h
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- A very simple question . . .,
Seanpit
- Re: A very simple question . . .,
heekster
- Re: A very simple question . . .,
Seanpit
- Re: A very simple question . . .,
hersheyh
- Re: A very simple question . . .,
Seanpit
- Re: A very simple question . . .,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
DJT
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
DJT
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
hersheyh
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Dana Tweedy
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
wf3h
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
noctiluca
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Louann Miller
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
John Wilkins
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Caranx latus
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Greg Guarino
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Caranx latus
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Free Lunch
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Ray Martinez
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
DJT
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Robert Camp
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
hersheyh
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
wf3h
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
heekster
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Frank J
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
Seanpit
- Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...,
\(M\)-adman
Re: CHEZ WATT! (was Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek),
*Hemidactylus*
Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms,
heekster
Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms,
wf3h
Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms,
wf3h
Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms,
Kermit
Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms,
johnethompson2001
Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms,
Lee Jay
Texas university scientists criticize attempts to water down evolution instruction,
Jason Spaceman
Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Rolf
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
adman
- Re: Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Ye Old One
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
adman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Boikat
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Inez
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Inez
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
J. J. Lodder
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
adman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
zob95
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
James Beck
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
heekster
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Inez
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
r norman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
chris thompson
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
r norman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Wombat
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
chris thompson
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
r norman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Mark Isaak
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
adman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
adman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Bob Casanova
- Re: Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Ye Old One
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
heekster
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Frank J
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
adman
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Bruce Stephens
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Yet even MORE flood evidence!! [talk your way out of this],
\(M\)-adman
PUT THE MOUSE DOWN AND STEP AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER,
metspitzer
Without God,
r norman
Palin says teach evolution,
jspaceman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Zaius
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
snex
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
TomS
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Inez
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
AC
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Inez
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Inez
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Harshman
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
snex
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
snex
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
snex
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
TomS
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
TomS
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Desertphile
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John McKendry
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Zaius
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
AC
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Wilkins
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Stuart
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
John Wilkins
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Bob Casanova
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
AC
- Re: Palin says teach evolution,
Frank J
Re: More flood evidence,
Steven L.
Speciation in Colour,
TomS
Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of,
TomS
Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Free Lunch
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Bill Hudson
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
wf3h
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Free Lunch
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
AC
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
wf3h
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
[FAQ] Moderation and Posting to Talk.Origins,
David Iain Greig
Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth,
heekster
Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.,
heekster
Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
hersheyh
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
hersheyh
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
hersheyh
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
hersheyh
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
ErikW
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
ErikW
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Friar Broccoli
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Ye Old One
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
spintronic
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
John Harshman
- Re: Spin - John Part 3.,
Prof Weird
Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
John McKendry
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Bob Casanova
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
William Morse
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
William Morse
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Louann Miller
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Kermit
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Louann Miller
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Louann Miller
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Louann Miller
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Not the scientific method (Re: Do We Need Population Control?),
JTEM
- Re: Not the scientific method (Re: Do We Need Population Control?),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Not the scientific method (Re: Do We Need Population Control?),
JTEM
- Re: Not the scientific method (Re: Do We Need Population Control?),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Not the scientific method (Re: Do We Need Population Control?),
JTEM
- Re: Not the scientific method (Re: Do We Need Population Control?),
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Not the scientific method (Re: Do We Need Population Control?),
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Robert Carnegie
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Mark Isaak
- Not thinking things through,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Max
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Free Lunch
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Max
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
JTEM
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
William Morse
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Kermit
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Kermit
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Kermit
- Re: Do We Need Population Control?,
Ken Shackleton
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
John Wilkins
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Free Lunch
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution,
Inez
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution,
Earle Jones
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution,
Mitchell Coffey
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Caranx latus
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
wf3h
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Grandbank
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Vend
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Grandbank
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Vend
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
slothrop
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
TomS
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Grandbank
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Message not available
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John McKendry
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Grandbank
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John McKendry
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Shane
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Vend
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Will in New Haven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
wf3h
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Shane
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mark Isaak
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Walter Bushell
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Tiny Bulcher
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Cheezits
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
SkyEyes
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
SkyEyes
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
johnethompson2001
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Rusty Sites
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Charles Brenner
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mark VandeWettering
- Message not available
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Rusty Sites
- Re:STALKER ALERT WAS:[ Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their],
\(M\)-adman
- Re: STALKER ALERT WAS:[ Atheists support evolution because evolution,
chris thompson
- Re: STALKER ALERT WAS:[ Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their],
AC
- Re: STALKER ALERT WAS:[ Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their],
\(M\)-adman
- Re: STALKER ALERT WAS:[ Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their],
AC
- Re: STALKER ALERT WAS:[ Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their],
\(M\)-adman
- Re: STALKER ALERT WAS:[ Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their],
heekster
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
- Message not available
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
- Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
richardalanforrest
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Message not availableRe: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Charles Brenner
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Roger Pearse
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Michael Siemon
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Andre Lieven
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Cheezits
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Walter Bushell
Message not availableRe: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ilas
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Franklin
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
SkyEyes
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Franklin
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
SkyEyes
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Franklin
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
SkyEyes
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Franklin
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Wilkins
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
J. J. Lodder
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Cheezits
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
SkyEyes
Message not availableRe: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
\(M\)-adman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ernest Major
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Free Lunch
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Free Lunch
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Free Lunch
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
TomS
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
AC
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
carlip-nospam
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
TomS
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Harry K
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Stuart
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
chris thompson
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Free Lunch
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
J. J. Lodder
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Ye Old One
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Gregory A Greenman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mike Painter
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Earle Jones
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
johnethompson2001
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Mark VandeWettering
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
Suzanne
Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their,
John Harshman
</