Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- From: hersheyh <hersheyhv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 29, 5:57 pm, "adman" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
But the big bang is not
proven, the singularity defies known laws of physics
Are you saying that the big bang did not happen *because* the
"singularity defies known laws of physics" or that the singularity
does not exist because it "defies known laws of physics"? Exactly
what do you think the *empirical evidence* says about the origin (if
any) of the universe? BTW, no religious book can be considered
*empirical evidence* for anything but some insight into the religious
beliefs of the writers.
.
- References:
- Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- From: Jason Spaceman
- Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- From: David Hare-Scott
- Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- From: adman
- Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- From: r norman
- Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- From: adman
- Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- Prev by Date: Re: We Robot
- Next by Date: Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
- Previous by thread: Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- Next by thread: Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|