talk.origins

• Thread Index

---

• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Cj
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Woland
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Chez Watt (me! unusual keyboard!)
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: TomS
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: We Robot
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Woland
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: TomS
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Chez Watt (me! unusual keyboard!)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Vend
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Do We Live in a Giant Cosmic Bubble?
  • From: Seamus
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Evolutionist says you can't build a large wooden ship
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Boikat
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Pagano's Views on Science
  • From: Elijahovah
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: r norman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• News: Meat-eating dinosaur from Argentina had bird-like breathing system.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Do We Live in a Giant Cosmic Bubble?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Do We Live in a Giant Cosmic Bubble?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: TomS
• Re: Post Of The Month for September 2007 - the winner is:
  • From: rossum
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: TomS
• Re: Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick
  • From: Ron O
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Wombat
• Re: Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Patashu0
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick
  • From: Vend
• Re: Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Re: What will you do?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: adman
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Cj
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick
  • From: Cj
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Alan Morgan
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Augray
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick
  • From: Ron O
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick schools
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: r norman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Woland
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Debate erupts over proposal to teach creationism in Brunswick schools
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: adman
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Post Of The Month for September 2007 - the winner is:
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Max
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: adman
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Lord Vetinari
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Jablair
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: > > > > A SOCIALIST (COMMUNIST) NEVER CAN BE A REAL CHRISTIAN
  • From: jcon
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Re: What will you do?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: heekster
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Muhterem
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Max
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: TomS
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Woland
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: r norman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: adman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Woland
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: adman
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: adman
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: adman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Woland
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: James Beck
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: James Beck
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: TomS
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: TomS
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Max
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Max
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Max
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Max
• Re: News: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million
  • From: snex
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: We Robot
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: DougC
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: snex
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Kermit
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: OT: Grand Theft Bailout....
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: heekster
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Krubozumo Nyankoye
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: DJT
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: wf3h
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: raven1
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: eroot
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: wf3h
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Commentary: Stick to science in classrooms
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: eroot
• Re: Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: r norman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Harun Yahya offers prize for fossil proof of evolution
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: A clock
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: ----Once again-----
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Shane
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: ----Once again-----
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: adman
• Re: Six Simple And Reasonable Questions ...
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Bob Berger
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: adman
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: DJT
• Re: Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version
  • From: Cj
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: adman
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: adman
• Re: A clock
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: adman
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Vend
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Augray
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: DJT
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: KlausH
• Re: Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: Ron O
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Bob Berger
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Harun Yahya recants!
  • From: r norman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Sunday Morning Humour
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Sunday Morning Humour
  • From: spintronic@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Frank J
• National Geographic article on Neanderthals
  • From: heekster
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Re: test
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Sunday Morning Humour
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: test
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: test
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: test
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: adman
• Re: Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: test
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: MarkA
• Re: test
  • From: Frank J
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: test
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Sunday Morning Humour
  • From: spintronic@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Frank J
• test
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Ron O
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Wakboth
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: richardalanforrest
• Re: Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: JMNOW@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: adman
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: adman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: adman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: adman
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: adman
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: William Morse
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: adman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: adman
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: heekster
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: adman
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Chez Watt entry (Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Stuart
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: heekster
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: adman
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: adman
• Re: Norman perhaps wrong on Urbilateria (was Re: all hail Urbilateria)
  • From: r norman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: Jenny6833A
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Kermit
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Mike Duffy
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Garamond Lethe
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Chez Watt entry (Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Chez Watt! (was Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.)
  • From: raven1
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: adman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Strange Creature
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: News: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Jessica Alba Reveals Bikini Body 3 Months After Giving Birth
  • From: nsujin
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: News: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million
  • From: Cj
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Woland
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: adman
• Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Woland
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: adman
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: adman
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: adman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Lee
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Cj
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: TomS
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Augray
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Woland
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Woland
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: jcon
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Woland
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: DJT
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: jcon
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: What will you do?
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Chez Watt entry (Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: geoproc
• What will you do?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Chez Watt entry (Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Paul Newman Rip.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: conrad
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Stuart
• Re: News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Desertphile
• Chez Watt entry (Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences announce:)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: DJT
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: DJT
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• News: What legacy would humans leave in the rocks 100 million years hence?
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Chez Watt!
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: raven1
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: adman
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: muhadeeb
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: raven1
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: raven1
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: muhadeeb
• News: Mega-bird had a five-metre wingspan... and teeth
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: muhadeeb
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: muhadeeb
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Inez
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: arcangel
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: A clock
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Bear DNA vs Seal DNA
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Cabbage
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: snex
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: snex
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Chez Watt
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: > > > > A SOCIALIST (COMMUNIST) NEVER CAN BE A REAL CHRISTIAN
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: snex
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: raven1
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: raven1
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: adman
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Inez
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: > > > > A SOCIALIST (COMMUNIST) NEVER CAN BE A REAL CHRISTIAN
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: heekster
• Re: > > > > A SOCIALIST (COMMUNIST) NEVER CAN BE A REAL CHRISTIAN
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: adman
• Re: A clock
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: > > > > A SOCIALIST (COMMUNIST) NEVER CAN BE A REAL CHRISTIAN
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• News: Chromosomal evolution of the PKD1 gene family in primates.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: > > > > A SOCIALIST (COMMUNIST) NEVER CAN BE A REAL CHRISTIAN
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: > > > > A SOCIALIST (COMMUNIST) NEVER CAN BE A REAL CHRISTIAN
  • From: snex
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Frank J
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: James Beck
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Woland
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Vend
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: adman
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Chez Watt
  • From: The Pooflinger
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: AC
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: James Beck
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Inez
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: Phil
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: adman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Jim Willemin
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Cj
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: adman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Cj
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: snex
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: dali_70
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Assman's Buddy Stuart likes child porn
  • From: adman
• Teaching "It's That Time Again" 9-9-81
  • From: wenddis
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: snex
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: adman
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: snex
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: adman
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: snex
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: AC
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: snex
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: snex
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: AC
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: AC
• Re: Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Therion Ware
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: snex
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: A clock
  • From: jcon
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Dick C
• Re: Re: More scientific ignorance from Dr. John Morris
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: A clock
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: JMNOW@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: More scientific ignorance from Dr. John Morris
  • From: JMNOW@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Earth's oldest rocks found in Quebec
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Frank J
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: TomS
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: OT: Assman's Buddy
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: rossum
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: rossum
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ilas
• Re: A clock
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: We Robot
  • From: SortingItOut
• Not Neanderthals, but still scratching my head....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: We Robot
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: MarkJD
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Boikat
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: OT: Assman's Buddy
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: time for another test
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Shearwater
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: adman
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Shearwater
• "Super Science"? Some practical examples, please.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: bug dope
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• OT: Assman's Buddy
  • From: Stuart
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Dick C
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: heekster
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: bug dope
  • From: heekster
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: heekster
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: heekster
• Re: time for another test
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: heekster
• Re: Evidence persuades many to reject the molecules to man version of
  • From: Frank J
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter parallel to Christian clergy's statement.
  • From: heekster
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Woland
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Mark Schumacher
• A clock
  • From: heekster
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Thunderfoot vs VenomFangX
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences announce:
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Secular Believers Part 1 of 6 (Features Richard Dawkins)
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences announce:
  • From: adman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: We Robot
  • From: noctiluca
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: "Mysterious New 'Dark Flow' Discovered in Space "
  • From: B Richardson
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: TomS
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Cheezits
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Weldon
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: MarkJD
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Daoud
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: kola and the obama nazis
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Lee
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: bug dope
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Harry K
• Re: bug dope
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Inez
• Re: bug dope
  • From: TomS
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Mark Evans
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: kola and the obama nazis
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences
  • From: richardalanforrest
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Ultimate essence of prehistoric european dolmen (From de Mt.
  • From: RRRiu
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: bug dope
  • From: squealpiggy
• Re: bug dope
  • From: eroot
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2 Chez Watt!
  • From: Roland Anderson
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences
  • From: richardalanforrest
• Re: We Robot
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: We Robot
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: "Mysterious New 'Dark Flow' Discovered in Space "
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Lee
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Boikat
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: bug dope
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: snex
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• bug dope
  • From: RichD
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences announce:
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Scientists from the Hayashibara Museum of Natural Sciences announce:
  • From: adman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: snex
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: adman
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Lee Jay
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: JR Speights
• Re: kola and the obama nazis
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: ITV Debate with Richard Dawkins
  • From: JohnN
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: "Mysterious New 'Dark Flow' Discovered in Space "
  • From: null
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: JR Speights
• Re: "Mysterious New 'Dark Flow' Discovered in Space "
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: hersheyh
• "Mysterious New 'Dark Flow' Discovered in Space "
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: JR Speights
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: News: US astronomers discover inter-planetary collision.
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Chez Watt? Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Vend
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: time for another test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Chez Watt!
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Gail Futoran
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Gail Futoran
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: XaurreauX
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: SortingItOut
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: rossum
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: test
  • From: Sport_
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Cj
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Chez Watt!
  • From: Cj
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Re: News: US astronomers discover inter-planetary collision.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Cj
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: News: US astronomers discover inter-planetary collision.
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Using Algae as a biofuel - Can anything go wrong?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: POTM nomination: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: News: US astronomers discover inter-planetary collision.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Chez Watt!
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• "When Atheists Attack"--Newsweek
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: News: US astronomers discover inter-planetary collision.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: snex
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: snex
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Shearwater
• POTM nomination: Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: test
  • From: noctiluca
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: News: Extinct tortoise 'can live again'.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: TomS
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Eric Rowley
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Woland
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Woland
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: buck2thrice
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: ITV Debate with Richard Dawkins
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: test
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: g
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Boikat
• Proposal for a Theistic Design Detector
  • From: rossum
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Vend
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: News: US astronomers discover inter-planetary collision.
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Atheists support rain because rain supports their worldview
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Desertphile
• test
  • From: Joe Cummings
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Startlemyerfieldson
• News: Extinct tortoise 'can live again'.
  • From: Ye Old One
• News: Neanderthals 'enjoyed broad menu'.
  • From: Ye Old One
• News: Saturn's rings may be older than thought.
  • From: Ye Old One
• News: US astronomers discover inter-planetary collision.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Tristan Miller
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: JennyB
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: Roger Pearse
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: We Robot
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter parallel to Christian clergy's statement.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Question about Chromosome #2
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Kent
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Cj
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Cj
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: JR Speights
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter parallel to Christian clergy's statement.
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Max
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter parallel to Christian clergy's statement.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Roger Ebert explains himself
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Proposed Texas science standards would drop creationist lingo
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: time for another test
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jim Lovejoy
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Gregory A Greenman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Boikat
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: ExtantDodo suspected from YouTube again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: William Morse
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter parallel to Christian clergy's statement.
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jack Dominey
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Patashu0
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: eroot
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: eroot
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• ExtantDodo suspected from YouTube again
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: eroot
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Grandbank
• Finally, something adman may be qualified to discuss
  • From: phillip brown
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Vend
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: heekster
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Blog: The Word "Theory" and Evolution.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Another test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Kermit
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: johnethompson2001
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: snex
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• time for another test
  • From: Zucadragon
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: adman
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: Jablair
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: TomS
• Re: Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: jspaceman
• In the News: Taking on Darwin in Turkey
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Harun Yahya: 'All Terrorists Are Darwinists'
  • From: jspaceman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: snex
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Chez watt Re: We Robot
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Inez
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Woland
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: arcangel
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Gail Futoran
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: AC
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: James Beck
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: buck2thrice
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Augray
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: leland . mcinnes
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: TomS
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: g
• Re: Re: The Orchid
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: The Orchid
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: The Orchid
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Dragonblaze
• Kirsten Bomblies, MacArthur Fellow
  • From: TomS
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Chemical Pete
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: g
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: adman
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Ilas
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Vend
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: We Robot
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Neil W Rickert
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Boikat
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Boikat
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Boikat
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Neil W Rickert
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: adman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Boikat
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: adman
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: adman
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: adman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: Shane
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Cj
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Neil W Rickert
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: Shane
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Another test
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: William Morse
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: geoproc
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: The Orchid
  • From: Dan Luke
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: heekster
• The Orchid
  • From: adman
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Dawkins stumped Muslim style
  • From: Max
• Re: We Robot
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• News: Rabbis back evolution and oppose creationism in letter parallel to Christian clergy's statement.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• News: Insight into the evolution of parasitism.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: We Robot
  • From: eroot
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: Stuart
• News: Ancient reef find 'may push back evolution'.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Jack Dominey
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: snex
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: geoproc
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Cj
• Re: Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Neil W Rickert
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Anlatt the Builder
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: snex
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Patashu0
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Another test
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Another test
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Gail Futoran
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: jcon
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: AC
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: TomS
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: martin
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Rodjk #613
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: snex
• Re: Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Vend
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: We Robot
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: We Robot
  • From: geoproc
• Roger Ebert Answers Your Creationism Questions
  • From: AC
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Harry K
• Re: We Robot
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: AC
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Early fish had primitive fingers
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: ITV Debate with Richard Dawkins
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Early fish had primitive fingers
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Augray
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: TomS
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• We Robot
  • From: someone2
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Early fish had primitive fingers
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: AC
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Early fish had primitive fingers
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: AC
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Another test
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Boikat
• Do We Need Population Control?
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Another test
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Another test
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Another test
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Max
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Shane
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: raven1
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Mitchell Coffey
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: heekster
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: AC
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Dragonblaze
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Shane
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: eroot
• Re: Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: heekster
• Early fish had primitive fingers
  • From: Boony
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Another test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• http://ScienceStage.com - The universal online portal for science,
  • From: basst74@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Urumpel
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: Timberwoof
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: adman
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: adman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Woland
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Cj
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: adman
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: adman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: David Wilson
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Spin - John Part 3.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: raven1
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: David Wilson
• OT: Sam Harris op-ed on Sarah Palin
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: Mike Painter
• Always this quiet on a sunday?
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mike Painter
• > > > > BARACK OBAMA IS A FALSE CHRISTIAN, he is a socialist and
  • From: arcangel
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: TomS
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Dragonblaze
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Frank J
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: John Collins
• Gary Gaulin claims there is "Science" to ID
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Shane
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Dawkins stumped Muslim style
  • From: Roger Coppock
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Don Cates
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Dawkins stumped Muslim style
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Did this make it through? - Usenet Talk.Origins 'goes dark' on
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Another test
  • From: RAM
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Another test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Another test
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: heekster
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: eroot
• Re: Another test
  • From: heekster
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: heekster
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Turkey Blocks Access to Dawkins' Web Site
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: jcon
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Another test
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: Ken Shackleton
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Another test
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Augray
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: Dr.GH
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: ErikW
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: More scientific ignorance from Dr. John Morris
  • From: Greg G.
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: ErikW
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Devils Advocaat
• Chez Watt: was Re: From the talk.origins web site !
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Britain: Creationism should be taught in science lessons, say
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Inez
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Inez
• Re: Another test
  • From: Boikat
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Britain: Creationism should be taught in science lessons, say
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Britain: Creationism should be taught in science lessons, say
  • From: scenario_dave
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Another test
  • From: Ron O
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Britain: Creationism should be taught in science lessons, say
  • From: squealpiggy
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: Ron O
• Re: If.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: If.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: If.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: If.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: TomS
• Re: If.
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Another test
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Alexander
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Another test
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Human contamination eliminated.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• More scientific ignorance from Dr. John Morris
  • From: Troy Britain
• Re: In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• WingNutDaily promotes another bizarre book
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Another test
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Bill Morse
• Relevant comic
  • From: LloydBrown
• Britain: Creationism should be taught in science lessons, say teachers
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Bill Morse
• Re: Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Another test
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Creation vs. Evolution (Part 1 of 14)
  • From: metspitzer
• Another test
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: David Hare-Scott
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: noctiluca
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Baron Bodissey
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: snex
• Re: In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: eroot
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Relativistic Limerick
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Artificial creations
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Artificial creations
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Ye Old One
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Artificial creations
  • From: Inez
• Relativistic Limerick
  • From: heekster
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Inez
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Inez
• Re: In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Charles Brenner
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Emma Pease
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: eroot
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: KlausH
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Carl Kaufmann
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Vreeland
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• In the News: Anal Evolution
  • From: Josh Hayes
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: Prof Weird
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Elijahovah
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Frank J
• Re: Spin calling John 100% identity (Human & Gekko)
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Gene Poole
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• chez watt Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Artificial creations
  • From: muhadeeb
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Louann Miller
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Frank J
• Re: 2008 FV42
  • From: TomS
• Re: 2008 FV42
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Shane
• Re: Artificial creations
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Science has Proven that the origins of life were not the result of
  • From: Dave Oldridge
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: THE BORG
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless'
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Cory Albrecht
• Re: Artificial creations
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Artificial creations
  • From: THE BORG
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: John McKendry
• Artificial creations
  • From: THE BORG
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: snex
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Turkey Blocks Access to Dawkins' Web Site
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Vend
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Turkey Blocks Access to Dawkins' Web Site
  • From: Chris Krolczyk
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Vatican Official Defends Evolution Against 'Useless' Creationism
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Woland
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Cj
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Woland
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Woland
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Turkey Blocks Access to Dawkins' Web Site
  • From: Bill Hudson
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: MarkA
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Inez
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Inez
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Inez
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: snex
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: snex
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Collider's launch may spell end to U.S. lead in science
  • From: MarkA
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: MarkA
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: MarkA
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Jesse Ukaine
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Ouroboros_Rex
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: TomS
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Jesse Ukaine
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Jesse Ukaine
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Augray
• Re: THE FOSSIL RECORD REFUTES EVOLUTION
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: AC
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: AC
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Harry K
• Re: If.
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: THE FOSSIL RECORD REFUTES EVOLUTION
  • From: Rolf
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Turkey Blocks Access to Dawkins' Web Site
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Augray
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Sapient Fridge
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Mike Painter
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: AC
• Chez Watt! (was Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their)
  • From: AC
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: AC
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: AC
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism teaching
  • From: AC
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their
  • From: murdock
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism teaching
  • From: uray
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: If.
  • From: Cabbage
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: If.
  • From: snex
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: William Morse
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Gene Poole
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: If.
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Gene Poole
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: News: Catholic universities plan scientific examination of
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: News: Spotlight on evolution.
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Cj
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Chez Watt: Re: If.
  • From: heekster
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Bill Morse
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: raven1
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: heekster
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: raven1
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Augray
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Augray
• Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: heekster
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Emma Pease
• Re: If.
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Shane
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Shane
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: Ron O
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism
  • From: TheBicyclingGuitarist
• N. Carolina: Brunswick school board to consider creationism teaching
  • From: Jason Spaceman
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Joseph Humming
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: snex
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Turkey Blocks Access to Dawkins' Web Site
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: If.
  • From: snex
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: ITV Debate with Richard Dawkins
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Honest question - so why do scientists suport ToE?
  • From: tension_on_the_wire
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: orcfestgm
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Tiny Bulcher
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: ITV Debate with Richard Dawkins
  • From: Grandbank
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Stockwell
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: AC
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Jesse Ukaine
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: AC
• Chez Watt Re: Compare the two.
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: TomS
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: slothrop
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Jesse Ukaine
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: snex
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: TomS
• ITV Debate with Richard Dawkins
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: slothrop
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: TomS
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: hersheyh
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Joseph Humming
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Joseph Humming
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Harvest Dancer
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: early evolution of atmosphere
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: TomS
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: louis14
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Will in New Haven
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: John McKendry
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Gene Poole
• Re: Paging Spintronic
  • From: g
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: TomS
• Re: News: Catholic universities plan scientific examination of
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: News: Spotlight on evolution.
  • From: TomS
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: richardalanforrest
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: News: Catholic universities plan scientific examination of
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: Urumpel
• Re: Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: A.Carlson
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Matrix needed "Goddidit" vs "Satandidit"
  • From: Mr tiktaalik
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Mike Dworetsky
• Re: Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: Thurisaz the Einherjer
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: GCPAXSZJIGKY
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Tony G.
• Re: Re: Re: Atheists support evolution because evolution supports their worldview
  • From: Suzanne
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: g
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Max
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: g
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Max
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Free Lunch
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Tim Norfolk
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Ymir
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Lets take a look at the history of science [YOU ARE GONNA JUST LOVE THIS]
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Did this make it through? - Usenet Talk.Origins 'goes dark' on
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Sonofagunzel
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J.J. O'Shea
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: heekster
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Steven L.
• Re: Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Shane
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Did this make it through? - Usenet Talk.Origins 'goes dark' on
  • From: Bill Morse
• Re: Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: geoproc
• Request for an extract from the glossary of Ray's paper
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: geoproc
• Re: Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: orcfestgm
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• News: Catholic universities plan scientific examination of evolutionary theory
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Evolution of Sexual Reproduction-It's Impossible
  • From: metspitzer
• Some questions I'd like answered, and some answers I'd like
  • From: orcfestgm
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: you got "variation."
  • From: Bill
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: snex
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: peer review process
  • From: Max
• Re: you got "variation."
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: you got "variation."
  • From: Bill
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• Re: way OT: Is salvation possible?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: way OT: Is salvation possible?
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Legend places biblical Eve in Saudi Arabia graveyard
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: RAM
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Mark Isaak
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Bob Casanova
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Augray
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Ouroboros_Rex
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: LHC explained
  • From: Vend
• Re: LHC explained
  • From: Vend
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Augray
• Re: Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: snex
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Difference between humans and apes, a question for creationists.
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Augray
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: Joseph Humming
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Chez Watt: Compare the two.
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Gene Poole
• Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Andre Lieven
• Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Royal Society and creationism
  • From: Ernest Major
• I just realised...
  • From: Iain
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: snex
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: New species of ant
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: AC
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: AC
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: AC
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for August 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for August 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Paul J Gans
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Richard Clayton
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: TomS
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: RAM
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: way OT: Is salvation possible?
  • From: Occidental
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for August 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: New species of ant
  • From: TomS
• Re: Tribute to Kent Hovind
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• New species of ant
  • From: Boikat
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Tom McDonald
• Re: Britain: Leading scientist urges teaching of creationism in
  • From: Ron O
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Augray
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Bob Kerry on "Imus in the Morning"
  • From: TomS
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Greg Guarino
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for August 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Friar Broccoli
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: TomS
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: Shane
• Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: In the News: Creation Museum prepares for Darwinian emphasis
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Sarah Palin a creationist?
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: early evolution of atmosphere
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: First Law of Thermodynamics [from a dummy called (m)adman]
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: spintronic
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: spintronic
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: JTEM
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Phylogenetic question for John Harshman
  • From: Ernest Major
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: way OT: Is salvation possible?
  • From: Shane
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: way OT: Is salvation possible?
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: way OT: Is salvation possible?
  • From: The Enigmatic One
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Michael Siemon
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: RAM
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: peer review process
  • From: Shane
• Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Stuart
• Re: Legend places biblical Eve in Saudi Arabia graveyard
  • From: Boikat
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Shane
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Sonofagunzel
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: Harry K
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Dana Tweedy
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: macaddicted
• Re: Legend places biblical Eve in Saudi Arabia graveyard
  • From: JTEM
• Re: peer review process
  • From: raven1
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: AFA: Scientists smash atoms to search for 'origins'
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Ray Martinez
• Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: DuhIdiot
• Re: Tribute to Kent Hovind
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Britain: Leading scientist urges teaching of creationism in
  • From: AC
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: peer review process
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Chez Watt? Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for August 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: early evolution of atmosphere
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: 2008 FV42
  • From: John Wilkins
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: heekster
• Re: Can any Darwinist in this Forum....
  • From: Aerion
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Emma Pease
• Re: Chez Watt? Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: heekster
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: chris thompson
• Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: 2008 FV42
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Caranx latus
• Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: wf3h
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Walter Bushell
• Re: In the News: Luskin likes Spore
  • From: coaster
• Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Shane
• Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: Shane
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: Robert Carnegie
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Can any Darwinist in the forum produce an argument showing
  • From: Aerion
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: catholic antisemitic group meets with pope to protest evolution
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: Compare the two.
  • From: Vend
• Re: In the News: Anglican church to apologize to Darwin
  • From: heekster
• Re: New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: John Harshman
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Shane
• Chez Watt? Re: One of Talk.Origins' Own in the News?
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: better newsgroup reader
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: In the News: Luskin likes Spore
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: Goblins of the world unite!!!
  • From: *Hemidactylus*
• Re: *** Post Of The Month for August 2008: Vote Now! ***
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• New quote mine? (was Re: you got "variation.")
  • From: Rupert Morrish
• Re: In the News: Creation Museum prepares for Darwinian emphasis
  • From: David Canzi
• Re: Church says sorry to Charles Darwin
  • From: Caranx latus