Re: Still no light penetrating cave that is Pagano's brain
- From: Bob Casanova <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:29:24 -0700
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:44:19 -0700, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Rusty Sites
<SpameYouToo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
T Pagano wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:03:25 -0700 (PDT), Switch89
<Ryansarcade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Science is about following the evidence wherever it leads.
1. This is highly misleading. The label "evidence" is a conclusion.
It is applied to raw observations which can be interpreted in the
light of some theory. If the theory cannot interpret the raw
observations then they are labeled "discordant."
Please list observations concerning evolution that are labeled
discordant. Of course you won't.
Answering for Tony, who for some unexplained reason doesn't
seem to want to answer for himself:
"The fact that the proven truth of the Bible is not taken
into account in any scientific theory of evolution is
discordant. This is so obvious even you, and all the
atheists who post to t.o, whether or not they believe in a
deity, should understand it!"
<snip>
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Anti-science creationist posters
- Next by Date: Re: Re: News: Galactic clash sheds light on dark matter.
- Previous by thread: News: Study shows more genes are controlled by biological clocks.
- Next by thread: RustySites offers an interesting post which demonstrates critical areas where atheists are seriously mistaken
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
