Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- From: Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
John Harshman wrote:
r norman wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:20:37 -0700, John Harshman
<jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
r norman wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:03:11 -0700, John HarshmanYes, but is the light on or off?
<jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
r norman wrote:You can do better. This is a simple homework problem:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:39:16 -0700, John HarshmanI can't type that fast anyway.
<jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
r norman wrote:<snip all except a hopefully countable infinity of posts>
Good idea but my ISP doesn't have sufficient bandwidth.Infinitely longer, apparently. Hey, why not try it the other way around.All finite series fail to diverge. You just have to wait a littleHah! Your series is failing to diverge.According to Einstein's theory, all messages are necessarilyYou are apparently absorbing my words by osmosis, even though you'reAlthough I am still ignoring you, you probably already realize that myActually, Achilles was the victim of a converging series, which lets himAs you can see, I am simply ignoring your post. I am fully aware ofNow you have my interest up. I'm going as long as you will.You people are merciless!This is getting harder and harder. I would like to call it quits.You realize that all you have to do is fail to reply, right
the incredible persistence you have shown in the past, for example
with our old friend, the vocabulariest and semiotician UC. In that
case I shall try the delaying technique: waiting one hour for my
first replay, then two hours, then four, then eight. In that way, as
Zeno demonstrated so well, your inverse Achilles will never be able
to catch my inverse tortoise.
catch the tortoise easily. Your diverging series should, however,
achieve your aim. Eventually.
aim will be achieved at the next harmonic convergence.
ignoring me. I should start inserting subliminal messages fnord.
subluminal.
longer.
Just answer in half the time every time and we'll be done with the
thread in finite time, though unfortunately after an infinite number of
messages.
So. If you have a light switch that will stand the strain, and flip it
off, then on again half a second later, then off 1/4 second later, and
so on, when you stop after one second is the light on or off?
Consider the function h(x) = sin(1/x) for x>0. Show that no matter
how h is defined at x=0 it will be discontinuous at x=0.
You specified that the switch could stand the strain, but forgot to
make the filament of the light bulb tolerate the onrush of current
when it turns on. The bulb burned out long before one second, long
being at least several nanoseconds.
Didn't I mention it was an LED bulb? Sorry. And it was a magic LED bulb
that could turn on and off an infinite number of times with no problems.
They don't make 'em like they used to.
Each time you touch the on-off switch, you impart mechanical energy
into it. As you reach the discontinuity, you introduce an infinite
amount of energy into the switch, and either you push it through a
wall, or it vaporises.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- References:
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- From: r norman
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- From: r norman
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- From: r norman
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- From: r norman
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- Prev by Date: Re: Common Ancestor?
- Next by Date: Re: How was Noah's Ark discovered?
- Previous by thread: Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- Next by thread: Re: Poor Noah and tree ring dating
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|