Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: "Suzanne" <shiloh7@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 00:26:01 -0500
"Woland" <jerrydeon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:376b47f4-afd5-4c0c-a885-f01818d8c0c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 7, 4:22 pm, "Suzanne" <shil...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:,snip.> > YourI have not misunderstood cuneiform! It is the first known
point?
<snip>
Akkadians, Sumerians, Babylonians, and Assyrians all had
cuneiform writing, and apparently understood it, which
gives us the information that this gigantic group of
people had some kind of common language at one time.
Cuneiform likely began as picture writing, but eventually
certain things were dropped and then letters were formed
that were equivalent to the positions of the characters of
cuneiform that look like golf tees or nails in their shape.
Suzanne
No, you misunderstand the nature of cuneiform.
1) Sumerian is a language isolate. That means that as far as we can
tell, it was not related to the other languages of the same region.
2) Cuneiform can be used to write any language. Different languages
adopted it. This does not mean that they had a common language
written language. People took their knowledge of it with
them when they moved away. How else can you account
for the fame and usage of cuneiform? Did you know that
it is found even in Bolivia?
http://www.geocities.com/webatlantis/fuentemagna.htm
Suzanne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Mike Painter
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Cory Albrecht
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: TomS
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- References:
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Free Lunch
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Suzanne
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- From: Woland
- Re: Evolution is not a fact
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Elsberry on-the-run?
- Next by Date: Re: Dana equivocates concerning the meaning of Theism (find out why)
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution is not a fact
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution is not a fact
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|