Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- From: Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 06:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 5, 6:08 am, Rupert Morrish <rup...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was surprised how hard it is to find (via Google) actual values for
the densities of the liquid and solid phases of the molecules I mentioned.
Probably easier to go and look. Titan has lakes of methane and
ethane. I don't know for sure if that implies something about
destiny, but I think really we just want somewhere to go paddling.
Having said that, we may want a more effective solvent.
Is there any other point that isn't refuted off-the-shelf from
"Creationist Claims"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- From: peter
- Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- References:
- Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- From: Jason Spaceman
- Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- From: Rupert Morrish
- Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- From: peter
- Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- From: Rupert Morrish
- Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- Prev by Date: Re: Conservapedia gets schooled by biologist
- Next by Date: Re: How many times have wings evolved?
- Previous by thread: Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- Next by thread: Re: Commentary: Design argument and beyond
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading