Re: Science Hates Religion
- From: LT <LTflermy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 31, 1:10 pm, "Steven L." <sdlit...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Elijahovah wrote:
In a talk.origins post, a man gripes that religionists who try to
explain science are kooks if you trace all their posts because they
debate older issues like Darwin's aquired characteristics which were
foolish issues now known even by science to be false. I would like to
point out that Jacob did such a test for 20 years from 1781-1761 BC
long before Darwin and so he was on the scientific development long
before Darwin by about 3800 years ahead.
Do you have any proof of this?
--
Steven L.
Email: sdlit...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
I smell a reply coming something like "Of course. The Bible says..."
LT
.
- References:
- Science Hates Religion
- From: Elijahovah
- Re: Science Hates Religion
- From: Steven L.
- Science Hates Religion
- Prev by Date: Would Ray's writing make more sense if... ?
- Next by Date: Re: News: Flatfish evolution was neither fluke nor turbot-charged.
- Previous by thread: Re: Science Hates Religion
- Next by thread: Re: Science Hates Religion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|