Re: Whats taking so long?
- From: Cj <Cj@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:58:46 -0400
Paul Ciszek wrote:
In article <5250dd14-6972-420a-9db7-5704bc0374dd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,So artists are plagiarists when they paint from life?
chris thompson <chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 30, 5:43 pm, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:When will the Craig Venter Institute, plagiarize synthetic life?Why is it plagiarism?
Any idea how many genes make up this "minimum genome" ?
Or is it still well into the hundreds?
Weird that!
I teach my students about plagiarism every semester. If Ventner
synthesizes life, is it plagiarism?
If so, why?
Please don't respond in generalities. Plagiarism is a VERY specific
charge.
Please do everyone the courtesy of providing every reference
available.
It's not a bad term--as I understand it, the plan is to take a naturally
existing genome, pare it down as much as possible, then assemble that
DNA sequence artificially and see if you can produce a living cell from
it. When that sort of thing is done with technology, it's called
"reverse engineering" instead of "plagiarism", but its the same idea.
It is plagiarism in the sense that the DNA sequence used to produce the
artificial cell will not be original work, but copied from somewhere.
The fact that it is copied from nature instead of from another person's
work doesn't really change anything.
.
- References:
- Whats taking so long?
- From: spintronic
- Re: Whats taking so long?
- From: chris thompson
- Re: Whats taking so long?
- From: Paul Ciszek
- Whats taking so long?
- Prev by Date: Re: Science Hates Religion
- Next by Date: Re: How many times have wings evolved?
- Previous by thread: Re: Whats taking so long?
- Next by thread: Re: Whats taking so long?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|