Re: Science Hates Religion
- From: "John Smith" <bobsyoungbro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:28:27 GMT
"Elijahovah" <rschiller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:01f724e6-29a2-45de-94ae-f46872d45141@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In a talk.origins post, a man gripes that religionists who try to
explain science are kooks if you trace all their posts because they
debate older issues like Darwin's aquired characteristics which were
foolish issues now known even by science to be false. I would like to
point out that Jacob did such a test for 20 years from 1781-1761 BC
long before Darwin and so he was on the scientific development long
before Darwin by about 3800 years ahead. So if you wish to prove
evolution wrong because its founder was wrong, well sorry guys but my
founder Jacob was wrong too. But he also was corrected 3800 years
before Darwin; so its pathetic Darwin had to suck up the vomit to
taste it again. What does that say about people everywhere on the
planet. Dont go trying to say lies are only a product of religion and
not a product of science too.
Lies are a product of religion ....... mistakes, and ego based stubborness
are a pitfall of science.
And so I posted this as a reply in talk.origins:
Perhaps you overlook that many blame a current school of thoughts to
being no better than its origin.
Indeed if we are all as Adam then we'll never be perfect. Not even
perfect in a proper redefined way.
(Example, Jesus did not sin by calling leaders as hypocrites, yet many
Christians still say that your not a Christian when you do call people
hypocrites, In essence then Jesus is not their example because they
have rationale for everything they do to excuse their concepts.)
The point is that if you look at science, it does still have its far
off kooks trying to fly without
device, trying to create new elements without proper physical law,
etc. Pseudo-science
does exist in the extreme among atheists who feel in their own mind
they are scientific.
"Science" openly admits to there being "kooks" - and deals with them AS
kooks.
Religion accepts, excuses, and sometimes even defends "kooks" rather than
"cleaning up it's own house"!
Where is the SANE and rational religious condemnation against those KOOKS
who bellow absolute creationism?
So if science has to extremes of truth and lie, then what makes you
think that religion
does not have its extremes of truth and lie. And the truth would be
scientific, a reality.
Science self-corrects - as FACT and EVIDENCE become known.
Religion, since it has NO basis in facts and evidence - only goes with the
flow of what eversane, or insane, manipulated "popular opinion" drives it.
The measure of science is a ruler that can be interpreted. And just as
49,000 years
are stretched to millions of years back to when light first shined on
a global ocean
for plant sea life and plankton, it can also be scrunched to only 7000
years or 168 hours
by the extremists. There is no need to make a division of theist
versus atheist, nor a
division of science versus religion when in fact the issue is merely
truth versus lie.
No, it's a matter of reality against imaginary.
As regards this, Jesus said the truth is the son who comes back and
does the work even though he denied the father,
even though his brother does not deny the father and says yes father i
will do all you want.
An atheist scientist can do the work of God that a theist priest is
not.
Jesus also said that its not the one who blasphemes God the father and
his Son that
eternally dies, but the one who blasphemes the spirit (to do the work)
ends up on a stagnant
path (not following the driven spirit to act on what he knows) to
eternal death.
This is exactly why true science has succeeded even though denying
God. They have found truth
by truning their backs not on God butu on the churches who think
they're God.
Science doesn't deny god! It just asks that IF there is a god - where's the
evidence?
THERE IS NONE!
You can no more "turn your back" on something that isn't there - than you
can something that claims to be everywhere.
.
- References:
- Science Hates Religion
- From: Elijahovah
- Science Hates Religion
- Prev by Date: Re: Patriot College Accrediting needed!
- Next by Date: Re: Evolution a hot political topic in Kansas
- Previous by thread: Re: Science Hates Religion
- Next by thread: Re: Science Hates Religion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
