Science Hates Religion

In a talk.origins post, a man gripes that religionists who try to
explain science are kooks if you trace all their posts because they
debate older issues like Darwin's aquired characteristics which were
foolish issues now known even by science to be false. I would like to
point out that Jacob did such a test for 20 years from 1781-1761 BC
long before Darwin and so he was on the scientific development long
before Darwin by about 3800 years ahead. So if you wish to prove
evolution wrong because its founder was wrong, well sorry guys but my
founder Jacob was wrong too. But he also was corrected 3800 years
before Darwin; so its pathetic Darwin had to suck up the vomit to
taste it again. What does that say about people everywhere on the
planet. Dont go trying to say lies are only a product of religion and
not a product of science too.

And so I posted this as a reply in talk.origins:
Perhaps you overlook that many blame a current school of thoughts to
being no better than its origin.
Indeed if we are all as Adam then we'll never be perfect. Not even
perfect in a proper redefined way.
(Example, Jesus did not sin by calling leaders as hypocrites, yet many
Christians still say that your not a Christian when you do call people
hypocrites, In essence then Jesus is not their example because they
have rationale for everything they do to excuse their concepts.)

The point is that if you look at science, it does still have its far
off kooks trying to fly without
device, trying to create new elements without proper physical law,
etc. Pseudo-science
does exist in the extreme among atheists who feel in their own mind
they are scientific.
So if science has to extremes of truth and lie, then what makes you
think that religion
does not have its extremes of truth and lie. And the truth would be
scientific, a reality.

The measure of science is a ruler that can be interpreted. And just as
49,000 years
are stretched to millions of years back to when light first shined on
a global ocean
for plant sea life and plankton, it can also be scrunched to only 7000
years or 168 hours
by the extremists. There is no need to make a division of theist
versus atheist, nor a
division of science versus religion when in fact the issue is merely
truth versus lie.
As regards this, Jesus said the truth is the son who comes back and
does the work even though he denied the father,
even though his brother does not deny the father and says yes father i
will do all you want.
An atheist scientist can do the work of God that a theist priest is
not.
Jesus also said that its not the one who blasphemes God the father and
his Son that
eternally dies, but the one who blasphemes the spirit (to do the work)
ends up on a stagnant
path (not following the driven spirit to act on what he knows) to
eternal death.

This is exactly why true science has succeeded even though denying
God. They have found truth
by truning their backs not on God butu on the churches who think
they're God.
So come to God, and stay with God, stay in science, but do not do the
same as they did
with churches. Do not make science your God. Do not create physical
laws in your own eyes
stretched beyond the truth (as the Church did). Do not think your
church or gathering of scientists
are not like clergy-laity who twist and go beyond the known science in
the claims that it is
how truth was discovered. They create a church of science filled with
crap, to be despised
just as much as a Church who waved POWER. Does not the scientific
community wave its power
and prevent newer further discovery of truth, of true science. You bet
your ass, and lose.
So of what great feat is it if neither church and atheist scientists
are on the real ark to survive
and they all die eternally for failing to see the issue here.
That is the truly pathetic thing. Watching them all burn in asteroid
fire, and then the rest drowned by the ocean.
ELIJAH

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Theory of God and the universe
    ... Being also a firm believer in science, I have come to the conclusion ... labs than it is to what they preach in church. ... The bible says god created the world in three days. ... The position you take is that ALL Christian churches have the view you ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: thoughts on Jesus
    ... It's nothing to do with modern biology or any other science. ... children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. ... that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the ... not saying that Catholics shouldn't adopt this view, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Ron O demonstrates the two most oft non substantive attacks
    ... The point is that if you look at science, it does still have its far ... So if science has to extremes of truth and lie, ... An atheist scientist can do the work of God that a theist priest is ... stretched beyond the truth (as the Church did). ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: King David and his son, King Solomon --case closed
    ... Science can tell us what happened 4 billion years ago with confident ... transport them back millions of years, then science works on hunches also. ... It answers the question of HOW God created our universe. ... UNTIL it is reported as truth. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: I Think
    ... reason based on a science that is under constant revision *is* ... Religion, but science inparticular, has been ... and science bring up regarding God, ... These distortions of truth, intentional or otherwise, ...
    (talk.origins)