Re: Kicked off of Uncommon Descent

In article
<85b5bfbe-1058-4160-85f4-e58ae336c710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ray Martinez <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 19, 6:06 pm, j.wilki...@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins) wrote:
Rolf <rolf.aalb...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seeing all the unbeliavbly idiotic stuff posted at PT by people even more
'advanced' than Ray, I find it very hard to belive he ever was banned
there.
But OTOH, I don't see no reason why he should post there nor here; he
should
just hurry up and get his paper out. Then there will no longer be any
dispute about evolution and people will 'flood' the churches.

Martyrdom has always been sweet for xtians.

As far as we can tell, Ray hasn't been banned from PT - he simply has
never posted any comments there in the first place (at least not under
the name "Martinez"). The martyr complex is all in his head.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."

I post under my real name like here.

PvM, your lap dog, erased all my posts and prevented all future posts
from posting (= illegal clandestine banning).

Intelligent people know what this means. I am objective enough to have
said that Psycho Dave (Atheist evolutionist) was banned at UD because
he could not be refuted. It's not a matter of opinion: if a legit
person of any persuasion is banned it is because they cannot be
refuted. Of course no evolutionist has this degree of objectivity
concerning me.

Anybody want to guess as to what Wesley Elsberry and William Dembski
have in common?

*
Fourteen letters in their names?

Elsberry identifies himself as a 'creationist evolutionist'.

See: http://www.antievolution.org/people/wre/essays/ea.html

Dembski is a creationist anti-evolutionist.

What they have in common is belief in creation.

Elsberry's writing is very readable, by the way. He seems at first
glance to be consistent and logical.

earle
*

"It is likely that the combination of Uniquely Creationist and
Creationist Evolutionist categories is the largest group of all."

--Wesley Elsberry

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Few Simple Questions - I want some answers - evos/YECs - NOW!
    ... You aren't either, Ray. ... Since evolution is impossible.... ... Any evidence of special creation of species? ... If you assert the quote marked words mean the whole world or Earth ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Elsberry a "creationist" (= obvious deception).
    ... Elsberry identifies himself as a 'creationist evolutionist'. ... What they have in common is belief in creation. ... Atheism is indefensible and he seeks to promote evolution as a Deist ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Kicked off of Uncommon Descent
    ... 'advanced' than Ray, I find it very hard to belive he ever was banned ... dispute about evolution and people will 'flood' the churches. ... What they have in common is belief in creation. ...     Creationist Evolutionist categories is the largest group of all." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Elsberry a "creationist" (= obvious deception).
    ... Elsberry identifies himself as a 'creationist evolutionist'. ... What they have in common is belief in creation. ... Atheism is indefensible and he seeks to promote evolution as a Deist ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Back in the good old days.
    ... I didn't say Creationism, I said "creation." ... Why would "evolutionists" hate creation? ... That doesn't follow, Ray. ... in the fact that they promote human evolution. ...
    (talk.origins)