Re: Kicked off of Uncommon Descent

On Jul 19, 6:06 pm, j.wilki...@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins) wrote:
Rolf <rolf.aalb...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seeing all the unbeliavbly idiotic stuff posted at PT by people even more
'advanced' than Ray, I find it very hard to belive he ever was banned there.
But OTOH, I don't see no reason why he should post there nor here; he should
just hurry up and get his paper out. Then there will no longer be any
dispute about evolution and people will 'flood' the churches.

Martyrdom has always been sweet for xtians.

As far as we can tell, Ray hasn't been banned from PT - he simply has
never posted any comments there in the first place (at least not under
the name "Martinez"). The martyr complex is all in his head.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."

I post under my real name like here.

PvM, your lap dog, erased all my posts and prevented all future posts
from posting (= illegal clandestine banning).

Intelligent people know what this means. I am objective enough to have
said that Psycho Dave (Atheist evolutionist) was banned at UD because
he could not be refuted. It's not a matter of opinion: if a legit
person of any persuasion is banned it is because they cannot be
refuted. Of course no evolutionist has this degree of objectivity
concerning me.

Anybody want to guess as to what Wesley Elsberry and William Dembski
have in common?

Ray Martinez, Old Earth Creationist-species immutabilist.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wherein Ray Martinez explains why KNM WT 15000 ("Turkana Boy")
    ... The evidence in toto refutes a claim of this nature. ... That's not the question, Ray. ... indicates the work of an invisible Designer. ... Savior was produced by the holy spirit, not that evolution is an "accidental ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Opinion piece in NY Times - Taking Science on Faith
    ... reason then deserts us, it makes a mockery of science. ... Ray, you don't speak on behalf of Christianity. ... Evolution is not atheistic. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What is Evolution?
    ... objective facts show evolution to be pro-Atheism. ... Again, Ray, like your use of "non sequitur" above, you need to ... We use the term to mean acceptance of Darwin 1859. ... explains the evidence without invoking the supernatural. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism by cultist Richard Milton
    ... Again, Ray, what's with the "we"? ... someone would connect chance with the Theory of Evolution. ... Where is Mr. Rice "enraged"? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Steven & Mark: Faith has an object
    ... I've seen them and they are pretty convincing, Ray. ... What evidence do you have that living things don't have the "power" to change into more complex living things? ... Evolution is, of course, a one horse race. ... The scientific inaccuracy of Genesis doesn't refute the existence of God, because God's existence is not tied to any one particular interpretation of the Bible. ...
    (talk.origins)