Mark Isaak is trapped

On Jul 7, 1:54 pm, Mark Isaak <eci...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:41:34 -0700, Ray Martinez wrote:
On Jul 6, 6:16�pm, hersheyh <hershe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 6, 7:55�pm, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 6, 7:23�am, Ron O <rokim...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

We oppose evolution on scientific grounds only.

Damn. �There goes another irony meter.

[snip]

This comment silently implies that evolution is opposed for religious
reasons (whatever that means). If true, then objectively reversed,
those who support evolution do so for anti-religious reasons. You
cannot have it one way but the forth coming responses by evolutionists
will insist to have it one way thus exposing their one way to be the
obvious misrepresentation that it is.

Ray, have you ever studied formal logic?  You could benefit from such
study.  Your lines of reasoning are not lines so much as scattered
inkblots which you interpret like a Rorschach test.

--
 Mark Isaak          eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
 the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
 being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
 exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Like I said: an evolutionist defending a one-way street. Once again:
if persons oppose evolution for religious reasons (which is the claim
of evolutionists here) then persons support evolution for anti-
religious reasons (which is my counter claim). Of course we already
know that nearly all Atheists support evolution. This means evolution
is anti-Bible and Christianity. The evolutionist cannot have it one
way. If persons oppose evolution for religious reasons then those who
support evolution do so for anti-religious reasons. Objective persons
know that Mark Isaak is trapped unless he admits that the assertion
that evolution is opposed for religious reasons is false----a
deliberate misrepresentation triggered by dislike of the real reason:
persons oppose evolution for scientific reasons.

Not only is Mark trapped but all evolutionists who have propagated the
idea to explain opposition to their theory as religiously motivated.
Of course this idea is a bad idea attempting to say no scientific
facts exist that contradict evolution. This supports the claim that
evolution is a religion and not a scientific theory because all honest
and objective persons know that all real scientific theories have
problems and are not perfect. Scientific theories have enemies----
persons who disagree and oppose----persons who have a different
scientific opinion.

Ray

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mark Isaak is trapped
    ... if persons oppose evolution for religious reasons (which is the claim ... religious reasons. ... they have scientists who study the theories. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Mark Isaak is trapped
    ... support evolution for anti- religious reasons (which is my ... Atheists support evolution. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Mark Isaak is trapped
    ... for anti- religious reasons. ... Atheists suppport evolution ... Some must, like many Atheists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Mark Isaak is trapped
    ... if persons oppose evolution for religious reasons (which is the claim ... religious reasons. ... know that nearly all Atheists support evolution. ... Of course it is not a matter of opinion: Atheists support evolution ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Mark Isaak is trapped
    ... if persons oppose evolution for religious reasons (which is the claim ... religious reasons. ... know that nearly all Atheists support evolution. ...
    (talk.origins)