Re: Re: Ray Martinez

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:03:11 -0400, Ye Old One wrote
(in article <grqt44da0cb17edi6kqrnr328uv7kvq8n6@xxxxxxx>):

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:23:22 -0600, "Dana Tweedy"
<reddfrogg@xxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:


"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:c3154217-cd3b-4537-98d9-3687d213abf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 10, 9:32 am, Earle Jones <earle.jo...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snip


Question for Ray: Are you half finished? 75%? More?
And: Do you have a title yet?

earle
*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Title: "The Invulnerable Refutation of Darwinism".

Wouldn't it be better to allow you readers to determine if your
"refutation"
is really invulernable, or not? "Invulernable" seems to be another word
that you don't seem to grasp the real meaning of.


I am about 40 percent finished.

You said you were "two thirds" finished a long time ago..... Was that a
lie then, or is this a lie now?

Both. We all know that he hasn't really started.


Facts take time to determine.

Actually, facts don't take a long time to "determine". Facts are true
by
definitnion. It's clear you aren't really interested in facts, especally
those that contradict your irrational beliefs.

Research takes time.

Quote mining and research aren't the same thing. How long does it take
for you to assume what you want to believe, and ignore the rest?

I have explained
this repeatedly.

Why should anyone believe you? Seriously, Ray, your claims are not really
very credible, considering your stated inability to acknowledge fact that
contradicts your beliefs, and your severe difficulty in applying logic.
When you use standard English in ideosyncratic ways, and when you regularly
adopt logical fallacies the way lonely old women adopt cats, it doesn't
bode
well for your "paper". It's even worse when you regularly hide behind
your
"paper" to avoid having to answer difficult questions.

DJT

Dishonest Ray stated, two years ago, that he was not going to post
here until his work was finished. How can anyone take him seriously?



I didn't take him seriously then.

--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Phil On The Archive.org Issue
    ... Sco is pandering when he plays with MMW and/or Phil. ... The facts tell me that's not likely. ... > opinion is presented as 100% fact. ... > No I don't Ray. ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Re: Re: Ray Martinez
    ... Question for Ray: Are you half finished? ... facts don't take a long time to "determine". ... those that contradict your irrational beliefs. ... adopt logical fallacies the way lonely old women adopt cats, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Phil On The Archive.org Issue
    ... I presented facts which you've even agreed that are facts (facts hard to ... You seemingly prefer however to take the view that pandering ... No I don't Ray. ... respect for jazz musicians, the ones who work really hard at their ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Re: Ray unable to admit defeat just like Adolf Hitler
    ... Rays incapability at anything useful is demonstrated by his preoccupation with books and people with a corresponding disregard for facts and evidence. ... I have written many replies to Ray, but he almost without exception ignore them. ... But he is blind to all that I say, except I suspect that deep down there may be a glint of understanding but he suppresses it. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolutionism Debunked in Larger Context
    ... This is the one area where I think I agree with Ray. ... It would help your case if your could provide any "facts" that faslify ... alternatives to the theory of evolution it just ... deliberately flipping God off when His encroachments were perceived. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading