Re: Ray Martinez
- From: "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not.to@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:34:30 -0400
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:42:23 -0400, Ray Martinez wrote
(in article
<9fb102b6-d543-4f1f-82cb-663b33e91795@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
On Jun 4, 6:11 am, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 22:49:46 -0400, Ray Martinez wrote
(in article
<7efb3c36-8d1b-4084-bfd3-8d828248e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
Right, this 40 percent accepts a God guided evolution.
We do? Wanna bet?
I was speaking about the stated beliefs of the 40 percent in the
polling data. It says this massive group of persons accept a God
guided evolution.
No we don't. At least I don't and neither do any of the various other theists
I know of. We figure that evolution is a fact, given the vast amount of
evidence supporting it. God may have _started_ the process, but there is
_zero_ evidence that He did thing one to guide it in any direction whatsoever
once it started.
You may, of course, point out any evidence that we might have missed. Note
that Biblical quotes are not evidence.
J.J. - where did this mass of persons obtain this belief?
We don't.
We both know
there is no such thing as "God guided" or "God supervised" evolution.
Amazing. You got something right.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
You are correct that something is amazing but incorrect as to what
that actually is. What is amazing is that a creationist and a
evolutionist agree concerning a 101 fact about evolution.
What's not amazing is that you're being an idiot. Again. As usual.
Ray
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ray Martinez
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Ray Martinez
- References:
- Re: Ray Martinez
- From: J.J. O'Shea
- Re: Ray Martinez
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Ray Martinez
- Prev by Date: Re: Darwinmania
- Next by Date: Re: Lack of evolution in computers and living things
- Previous by thread: Re: Ray Martinez
- Next by thread: Re: Ray Martinez
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|