Re: Why is there something, not nothing?

On Jun 17, 12:01 pm, AC <mojo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:43:21 -0700 (PDT),

How do you explain non-locality and the fact it appears observation is
necessary to fix a quantum state?

I don't have to explain it. The Copenhagen interpretation has been beaten
to death by guys like you.

There are a lot of alternate interpretations than the Copenhagen
interpretation.

You seem defensive, like you are afraid of anything that might
question your particular belief system.

Translation: I'm mixing metaphysics, philosophy, voodoo and science for some
new age bull***.

No, I'm engaged in creative philosophical thinking, which considers
the implications of modern physics. This goes in line with a long
tradition of philosophical idealism which seems very relevant in
thinking about the nature of modern physics . You seem to want to call
names to anyone who doesn't think exactly like you do. I suspect
deep down you know there might be something to all this speculation,
and you want to hold on to your point of view no matter what.

.

Loading