Re: Lack of evolution in computers and living things

On Jun 15, 11:59 am, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Seanpit wrote:
On Jun 13, 1:41 pm, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Seanpit wrote:
On Jun 12, 2:05 pm, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Seanpit wrote:
On Jun 12, 12:31 pm, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Seanpit wrote:
This technical paper [excerpts below] was submitted for presentation
at the Genetic Programming 1997 Conference (GP-97) held 13-16 July at
Stanford University, where Susumu Ohno was the scheduled keynote
speaker. Only two of six reviewers recommended accepting it.
"Only"? I'm surprised that any of the reviewers recommended accepting
that nonsense. I'd argue with you, but you show a tendency to wander off
when you're having problems, only to surface later having conveniently
forgotten there was any argument at all. This is a trait you share with
Tony Pagano, and it's not an attractive one.
Whatever John.  I've discussed your notions of common descent with you
at nausium.
The term is "ad nauseam".
My point exactly . . .
Your point is that you can't spell Latin?

sure ; )

I'm just not interested in your position on that topic
any more since I don't find anything you've said in all the large
number of your responses very convincing - sorry.  I'm just more
interested in other topics.  If you're not, no one is twisting your
arm here . . .
True. And in fact I'm not interested in this topic. Still, it seems odd
that you're uninterested in the basic fact of common descent. And are
you still claiming that, according to mitochondrial data, some humans
are more closely related to chimps than to neanderthals?
Hey, what about that? It turns out that you still are claiming this.
Would you care to defend that claim?

You want to add to the nauseam? I've gone around with you on this
topic as much as I care to for now.  I'm sorry.  I just don't find
your arguments all that convincing . . .   Repeating yourself over and
over again isn't going to change that.

http://www.detectingdesign.com/geneticphylogeny.html#Debate

Charming of you to give yourself the last word, as if your claims were
unanswerable. Typical, though.

There is no last word with you John. You will argue in circles until
the cows come home - - which is typical.

However, that link doesn't address the
question I asked you above. Which is also typical.

The links do address your questions and they also link to the entire
discussion on T.O.

Sean Pitman
www.DetectingDesign.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lack of evolution in computers and living things
    ... number of your responses very convincing - sorry. ... that you're uninterested in the basic fact of common descent. ... Would you care to defend that claim? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Lack of evolution in computers and living things
    ... number of your responses very convincing - sorry. ... that you're uninterested in the basic fact of common descent. ... It turns out that you still are claiming this. ... Would you care to defend that claim? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: AHA dietary recommendations
    ... But they sure did heavily promote ersatz meat replacements and vegetarianism when I was a subscriber. ... It doesn't bother me if they live that way or argue the POV in ways that don't advance it with false assertions and bogus science. ... I care about everyone telling the truth and being objective. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Why is number without health insurance increasing?
    ... some who argue health care as a right and that Grandma's 5 vessel ... bypass at age 95 is a "necessary" part of health care, ... In other words, no country ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Tammy Grimes found guilty - Dont steal dogs
    ... and we don't care if we can see the field ... Louis, you guys apparently only worry about ... "Only a bigot would argue that every Muslim was violent or opposed to Western freedom. ... Stupid is as stupid does. ...
    (rec.pets.dogs.behavior)
Loading