Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Mark Isaak <eciton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:37:35 -0700
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:35:30 -0700, Bill wrote:
There's nothing to read between the lines, no need to impute some
hidden agenda, just a straightforward observation that has been
dismissed without being refuted.
You're not listening. It *has* been refuted. First, DNA looks
undesigned, for a variety of reasons which I won't repeat yet again.
Second, there is no *evidence* for design except your word, and with all
due respect, your word does not mean much to scientists. Scientists will
be more than happy to propose design as a hypothesis as soon as there is
evidence for design which is not just as easily explained by previously
known processes.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Bill
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- References:
- The Cosmological Argument
- From: Foucaultian
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Bill
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Bill
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Kermit
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Bill
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: noctiluca
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Bill
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: noctiluca
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Bill
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: noctiluca
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Robert Carnegie
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: noctiluca
- Re: The Cosmological Argument
- From: Bill
- The Cosmological Argument
- Prev by Date: Re: Ray Martinez
- Next by Date: Re: The Cosmological Argument
- Previous by thread: Re: The Cosmological Argument
- Next by thread: Re: The Cosmological Argument
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading