Re: News: Dramatic reverse evolution among fish species.
- From: Walter Bushell <proto@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 21:38:45 -0400
In article <93o634haoc4r02dhblmtlsedgqgqupitig@xxxxxxx>,
Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 21:59:39 GMT, Faux_Pseudo <Faux.Pseudo@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
_.-In talk.origins, Ye Old One wrote the following -._
The researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre found that
while in the late 1960s, only 6 percent of sticklebacks were
completely plated, today 49 percent are fully plated and 35 percent
are partially plated, with about half of their bodies shielded in bony
armor.
"We propose that the most likely cause of this reverse evolution in
the sticklebacks is from the higher levels of trout predation after
the sudden increase in water transparency," said senior author
Catherine "Katie" Peichel.
Thats not 'reverse evolution'. The ones who can't survive without
armor are being less successful than those who have armor. Its just
evolution.
I agree.
There ain't no such thing as reverse evolution.
--
What is done in the heat of battle is (normatively) judged
by different standards than what is leisurely planned in
comfortable conference rooms.
.
- References:
- News: Dramatic reverse evolution among fish species.
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: News: Dramatic reverse evolution among fish species.
- From: Faux_Pseudo
- Re: Re: News: Dramatic reverse evolution among fish species.
- From: Ye Old One
- News: Dramatic reverse evolution among fish species.
- Prev by Date: Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- Next by Date: Re: Evolution is NOT random
- Previous by thread: Re: News: Dramatic reverse evolution among fish species.
- Next by thread: Re: News: Dramatic reverse evolution among fish species.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
