Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Bill <bil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
On May 17, 12:07 pm, Mark VandeWettering <wetter...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2008-05-17, Bill <b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'll reduce all my questions to just this one:
What is accessible to science to investigate is about 4% of all that
exists in this iteration of a Big Bang.
How did you come up with this number?
Bill
When you subtract dark matter and dark energy, what you have left is
the nature available for science to study - the "visible" 4% of the
universe. The matter and energy on the Dark Side is dark because it
can't be detected by any means know to science (today) and cannot,
therefore, be studied. Being beyond science also makes the dark stuff
non-scientific by definition. The existence of the Dark Side is
inferred by what theory says -should- be there, but it is most
certainly not nature in the sense of "nature is all there is". Pretty
cool stuff.
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- References:
- What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Vernon Balbert
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Alexander
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Bill
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Vend
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Bill
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Vend
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Bill
- Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- What is Intelligent Design?
- Prev by Date: Re: In the News: Home-schoolers learn to critique evolution
- Next by Date: Re: Newsweek's blog says Catholic C. often pro-science
- Previous by thread: Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- Next by thread: Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|