Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Vernon Balbert <vbalbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:33:54 -0700
On 5/16/2008 4:22 AM, alwaysaskingquestions went clickity clack on the keyboard and produced this interesting bit of text:
"Ilas" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9AA06881FED38lurker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"alwaysaskingquestions" <alwaysaskingquestions@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:695013F2vsm4oU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"John Wilkins" <j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageYou know as well as I do that the soul means something very different to
news:1ih1991.pgql7n1558fhyN%j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
If 3, then one wonders at the necessity for the gap itself. Why, forI don't follow your logic there, the belief is addressing the gap, not
example, think there is a "soul" if "soul" is never investigable?
creating the gap. People talk about the "soul" as an expression for
things we cannot otherwise explain, if we stop talking about the soul
that does not eliminate those things our wonderment at what causes
them.
most Christians. It's supposed to be that indefinable part of you that
ascends to heaven after death (or descends to hell),
It is more than that:
"The soul, according to many religious and philosophical traditions, is the
self-aware essence unique to a particular living being. In these traditions
the soul is thought to incorporate the inner essence of each living being,
and to be the true basis for sapience, rather than the brain or any other
material or natural part of the biological organism"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul
and as such it is
religion creating the gap.
So you reckon that if there were no religion then Man would not wonder where
his sapience comes from?
Religion was created primarily for this reason. (Other reasons were to explain phenomena that were, at that time, unexplainable and for power.) It was not based on reality but imagination. We're slowly coming up on times when religion is being replaced with knowledge. Either people are seeing that religion has no attachment to reality or they're just getting even more kookier; i.e. fundamentalists such as Ray. There will always be people who want there to be gods and psychics and spirits and demons, etc., but that number is being reduced.
Religion has always sought to explain things that people didn't understand. Why do things grow? Why do they die? What happens when we die? Why does lightning come from the sky and destroy so much? As we understand more and more of our world, religion loses its hold as we find scientific reasons for these previously unexplainable things. We know why things die. We know that lightning is simply a difference in electrical potential between the earth and clouds and when the difference is high enough it arcs between them. We can predict when and where we'll have lightning storms. We even manufacture lightning all the time!
We don't know everything and we never will. But our knowledge is always increasing. (This implies that the number of things to know is infinite. Probably not, but is there enough time to learn everything?) But as our knowledge increases, religion's hold on people gets looser and looser. It's been happening since Galileo and Copernicus, Benjamin Franklin helped speed it along and Darwin has certainly made a mess of things. It's happening now and will continue to happen unless one thing happens: God shows up.
--
Rule of Acquisition number 60: Keep your lies consistent.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- References:
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Ilas
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Prev by Date: Re: Slightly OT - David Brooks latest column
- Next by Date: Re: What is Intelligent Design?
- Previous by thread: Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Next by thread: Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|