Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Ilas <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 09:16:24 GMT
"alwaysaskingquestions" <alwaysaskingquestions@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:695013F2vsm4oU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"John Wilkins" <j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1ih1991.pgql7n1558fhyN%j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
If 3, then one wonders at the necessity for the gap itself. Why, for
example, think there is a "soul" if "soul" is never investigable?
I don't follow your logic there, the belief is addressing the gap, not
creating the gap. People talk about the "soul" as an expression for
things we cannot otherwise explain, if we stop talking about the soul
that does not eliminate those things our wonderment at what causes
them.
You know as well as I do that the soul means something very different to
most Christians. It's supposed to be that indefinable part of you that
ascends to heaven after death (or descends to hell), and as such it is
religion creating the gap. Even if we do find a complete explanation for
the way our minds work, that won't close that gap.
That's why I quibbled with your definition of number 3 - if an
adequate natural explanation is found for a belief then that belief
has to be abandoned or modified to fit with the natural explanation.
Or you could simply say god chose to do it that way.
I don't, however, see that science or philosophy has moved on to the
extent that they have an adequate natural explanation for what
religious people consider as the "soul".
And with something that has no definition and is essentially indefinable,
science never can.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- References:
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Earle Jones
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Ilas
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Ilas
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: AC
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Prev by Date: Re: Evolution is not a fact
- Next by Date: Re: EvŎlution
- Previous by thread: Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Next by thread: Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|