Re: Critique and refine my Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy argument please

On May 10, 1:10 pm, bi...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Other arguments include the claim that "the chances that this universe
forming is so small, it must be designed, etc." Once again, we're
holding a raffle of the universes.

Unfortunately, to propose a multitude of universe is to engage is the
purest blind faith imaginable. We can't observe any of these parallel
universes, so we have nothing but irrational blind faith to support
their existence.

Furthermore, proposing a multitude of blind faith-based universes
fails Occam's razor. We always need to look for the simplest possible
explanation for any phenomena. To propose a single God and a single
universe, is much simpler than to propose an infinite number of
universes based on pure blind faith.



Right. Everywhere we go, we observe that the same physical laws and
constraints obtain. Therefore we have to propose an entity that
violates all physical laws and constraints.

That's not simple; it's simple-minded.

Chris

.

Relevant Pages