Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Bob Casanova <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 12:31:41 -0700
On Fri, 2 May 2008 00:11:44 +0100, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by "alwaysaskingquestions"
<alwaysaskingquestions@xxxxxxxxx>:
"AC" <mojo214@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrng1kg8j.v5v.mojo214@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
Or to put this another way, is the FSM less likely to actually exist just
because no one seriously believes it exists?
It's not likely to exist when the people who made it up admit that they made
it up.
That's incorrect; no one's statements have any bearing
whatsoever on any physical fact.
<snip>
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Anthropus
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- References:
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: AC
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: AC
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: Ilas
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: AC
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Prev by Date: nEWS: Evolution of the insect Sox genes.
- Next by Date: Re: Scientific Disproof of Catholic Dogma?
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Next by thread: Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|