Re: Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- From: Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:11:49 +0100
In message <NI3Sj.12179$V14.11834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vernon Balbert <vbalbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On 4/30/2008 12:17 PM, John Harshman went clickity clack on the keyboard and produced this interesting bit of text:Just because a species colonises an environment in which it is free from prior constraints (such as predators) doesn't mean that it stops evolving. In fact I suspect that invasive populations on average undergo more adaptive evolution that there stay-at-home cousins - they're experiencing different selective pressures.Vernon Balbert wrote:On 4/30/2008 11:25 AM, Vend went clickity clack on the keyboard and produced this interesting bit of text:What about them?On 30 Apr, 19:18, "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkol...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:If you put Mr. Lizard in an environment in which he can flourish because
food is plentiful and there are not predators to compete with him, then
it looks like he evolved. But this is not necessarily the case. He may
be flourishing, which is not the same as evolving.
Natural selection can be as much a friend as a foe. Put a life form in
the right environment and it will flourish without any radical change to
its genome.
I don't think so.
Neutral evolution should still happen.
I don't know enough to say yea or nay to what you say, but what about rabbits in Australia, snakehead fish in the Potomac river and other species introduced by man into areas that have ravaged the ecosystems which were ill-equipped to handle the new species?
I'd like to know how neutral evolution has occurred with these invasive species.
For example, adaptive evolution has apparently occurred with cane toads in Australia. On a blog (Evolving Thoughts?) it was written that at the front of the expansion of cane toad range they are adapted for more effective dispersal, and within the interior of the range those adaptations are lost.
--
alias Ernest Major
.
- References:
- Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- From: Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- From: Vend
- Re: Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- From: Vernon Balbert
- Re: Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- From: Vernon Balbert
- Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- Prev by Date: Re: "Expelled" fades away at the boxoffice.
- Next by Date: Re: Re: thoughts on Jesus
- Previous by thread: Re: Rapidly Evolvling Lizards may not be evolving at all.
- Next by thread: Berlinski: The Scientific Embrace of Atheism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|