Re: Commentary: Despite scientist's refusal to recognize the truth,

On Apr 26, 8:10 pm, Ron O <rokim...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 26, 4:36 pm, Jason Spaceman <notrea...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



From the article:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I was amazed at the heading and article on the front page of section 1B on
Thursday, April 10. ("'Intelligent design' lacking in evidence from
nature.") The article was a classic example of the intellectual dishonesty
that the new film featuring Ben Stein highlights. The author, Bill
Fuenfhausen, dismisses as "absurd" the scientific evidence that indicates
our Earth did not evolve over billions of years.
Advertisement

Sixteen years ago as a school project, my son and I investigated the age of
the Earth. I was amazed at the scientific evidence that has been covered up
by so-called scientists. The article author, Mr. Fuenfhausen, talked about
the "awesome deep space telescope's pictures of the early universe." Mr.
Fuenfhausen, did you know that high school scientific textbooks tell us
that the heavenly bodies are moving away from each other at a certain rate?

What the textbooks do not tell is that at the present rate of movement all
galaxies should be separated from each other. Instead, science clearly
shows that they are still clumped together. Have you ever seen a large
amount of balloons released at one time? They soon separate from each
other.

If the Earth is indeed billions of years old because of the movement away
from the earth, our moon should have rings around it like Saturn! The
scientific evidence does not match up with what is presently being taught
in school.

Did you know there is dust in space, just as here on Earth? Space scientists
predicted a mile of dust on the moon and so designed the module that landed
on the moon to have duct feet to prevent sinkage into the dust. Instead,
they found 14 feet of dust, barely a few thousand years worth!

It has been years since I saw a creationist using the bogus moon dust
argument and this one is so messed up that it might not even be the
same argument. This guy is a real clown. Loki would be my guess, but
you can't parody a creationist.

Ron Okimoto



What about here on Earth. Mr. Fuenfhausen, have you studied the
sedimentation rate of the oceans? If the Earth were billions of years old,
almost all of the land should have been removed and deposited on the ocean
floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------

Read it athttp://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080426/OPINIO...
orhttp://tinyurl.com/6x57m8

J. Spaceman

Just for the record, there is a great panoramic shot of the lander
here:
http://www.panoramas.dk/fullscreen3/apollo_lm.jpg

Rodjk #613

.

Relevant Pages