Re: I'm done, I think we've won.
- From: Paul J Gans <gans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:36 am, Frank J <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the last year or 2, Sean Pitman is the only regular anti-
evolutionist here with arguments that actually make one think (but
that fail eventually). But even he has been scarce lately.
I think the game is to make the other guy think, by respectfully and
intelligently criticising their position (if they go first). Although
- is Sean Pitman the "stone cube on Mars" guy? - he doesn't quite do
that for me.
I don't think so. Sean Pitman is the "mutations have to take
place one nucleotide at a time" no matter what the actual lab
evidence actually says. And of course given his hypothesis
he can correctly show that evolution can't really occur in any
reasonable time. Of course his hypothesis is wrong, but pointing
that out to him is like praying for rain in the desert, and less
successful.
--
--- Paul J. Gans
.
- References:
- I'm done, I think we've won.
- From: stew dean
- Re: I'm done, I think we've won.
- From: Frank J
- Re: I'm done, I think we've won.
- From: Robert Carnegie
- I'm done, I think we've won.
- Prev by Date: Behe at Rocky Mountain College
- Next by Date: Re: Ben Stein's Expelled: penetrating and entertaining
- Previous by thread: Re: I'm done, I think we've won.
- Next by thread: Re: I'm done, I think we've won.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
