Re: no longer a creationist
- From: Free Lunch <lunch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:10:05 -0500
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:28:53 -0700 (PDT), in talk.origins
Ken Shackleton <ken.shackleton@xxxxxxx> wrote in
<a4df1efb-0251-48cc-9489-aaa0cae1d6f9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Apr 12, 2:56 pm, DaleKelly <THEREALDARK...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:28:29 -0700, Ken Shackleton wrote:
While I would agree that abortions are tragedies of immense magnitude,
banning or restricting them by law has created tragedies of far worse
magnitude.
human life must have an absolute value
Why? What does that statement mean anyway? Who sets the value and how
would it be applied?
We know that Bush values it at sero.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: no longer a creationist
- From: Ken Shackleton
- Re: no longer a creationist
- References:
- no longer a creationist
- From: DaleKelly
- Re: no longer a creationist
- From: Ken Shackleton
- Re: no longer a creationist
- From: DaleKelly
- Re: no longer a creationist
- From: Ken Shackleton
- no longer a creationist
- Prev by Date: Re: McCain: Did you know this?
- Next by Date: Re: Ben Stein on Fox
- Previous by thread: Re: no longer a creationist
- Next by thread: Re: no longer a creationist
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
