Re: The state of education in the USA.

In article <ddb839e3-e5c3-4e32-92d1-8c331c0051c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tgdenning@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:59 pm, Tim Norfolk <timsn...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 4, 3:54 pm, tgdenn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Apr 4, 1:21 pm, Tim Norfolk <timsn...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 4, 11:21?am, tgdenn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

[trim]

See the above. Without a lot of rote knowledge of basic arithmetic,
algebra becomes hard to follow, no matter what technology is used. In
that case, the underlying ideas of variables and functions become
meaningless, and inapplicable. There is some good evidence that, if
the abstract process engendered by learning algebra (see Piaget) is
not accomplished by a certain age, it will never be acquired. This is
similar to the tragic cases of humans who have never been exposed to
speech by age 8 or so, and do not have the brain connections that make
speech possible - ever.

The mathematical education community awaits your great expertise and
wisdom, but consider the following

1. Mathematics is the only subject to have been consistently taught
for about 2,500 years
2. In mathemaqtics, that which doesn't work is tossed onto the trash
heap, or given only a passing reference as a failed idea, or one
supplanted
3. Euclid's answer to King Ptolemy, who was bored by his lessons
"There is no royal road to geometry (mathematics)".

In short, I have yet to see one single innovation in mathematics
education that left students better prepared for further study. If you
have, let's see your evidence. From my experience, it takes properly-
prepared students with a willingness to work harder than in the non-
science disciplines. If you honestly have the magic bullet, you could
get a bunch of money from Bill Gates, and pretty much every major
corporation, since  most post-graduate management programs include a
screening test of 8th-grade mathematics.

[trim]

Most people I've had this discussion with who take your position end
up using some version of the same logical fallacy as you do---although
you seem to have thrown in some strawmen along with the traditional
question-begging.

Everything you've said relies on *defining* success as doing the
little rote manipulations and performing the little rote algorithms
that you've been doing and teaching for 30 years. What you've ignored
is that people who *use* mathematics as a tool to develop all the
wonderful tech that you describe (scientists and engineers) use
software to solve their math problems. There's nothing in the courses
you define as 'advanced' and 'abstract' that can't be done with
Mathematica or something similar.

Unfortunately, the 'win by definition' approach is yours. Not least,
you've declared what the other people are doing without really listening.

You've been given the longer answer with illustration and reference
from much experience. Here's the shorter (necessarily overgeneral):

People who can't do arithmetic with pen and paper can't
do it with a calculator either.

I was shocked to see this happen, but it did as I gave my college
astronomy students (as Tim has mentioned) a grade 8 (what used to
be) math test. Students who could get the answer by pen and paper may
or may not have used the calculators. Students who were trying only
the calculators missed almost everything.

You might think, and I used to until I saw the reality, that people
don't need to know the arithmetic themselves -- they only need to know
which keys to press. But, you're simply wrong. As Tim mentioned
about the 2500 years of experience, there really is some background
to say that certain things are needed to learn mathematics.

Two Asimov short stories of relevance (from 9 Tomorrows)
Profession
A Feeling of Power

[trim]

--
Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links.
Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much
evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they
would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The state of education in the USA.
    ... technology and its effects in education for about 20 years. ... students using new technology, the results ... through to higher-level material, including abstract mathematics ... Linear Algebra and the like. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: U.S. science education lags, study finds
    ... the weaker students just can't pass the course, ... basic math or physics requirement rather than one of those when I knew ... One of the classic problems with teaching algebra is ... calculus (which is what is used in mathematics) HAS ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
    ... there will be many high school students ... mathematics is, for whatever reason, necessary for higher learning. ... algebra-free statistics courses have given very poor results, ... is quite bright) was unable to pass high school algebra, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
    ... there will be many high school students ... mathematics is, for whatever reason, necessary for higher learning. ... is quite bright) was unable to pass high school algebra, ... algorithmic courses in the calculus and linear algebra, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sarah Palin- creationist VP candidate?
    ... that makes learning real mathematics impossible. ... colleges to keep and graduate students. ... reasoning. ...
    (talk.origins)