Re: How did a monkey give birth to a human ?

On Apr 2, 3:19 pm, Woland <jerryd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/KermitPragmatics

Kermit told us ".. > Many evolutionary scientists have never read
Darwin. Certainly current > ideas do not depend on how he used or
defined terms...."

Exactly, it makes no difference as to what Darwin posited.

If it makes no difference then this is the first theory in the history
of science where we have this remarkable situation - why are you using
the same term "natural selection" if you don't intend the same thing
Darwin intended: '..... NS is a force incessantly ready for action...'
- that is what Darwin wrote do a search on the text file you can
download from gutenbergpress on the term "....force incessantly ready
for action...." then what on earth you people talking about ? What
theory defined where that William Province labels "natural selection"
which he insists "does nothing" and isn't a force is he talking about.
Is Provine perhaps on drugs ? How could he say that NS does nothing if
Darwin said the exact opposite and then insist that Darwin was wrong !
Why is he then using Darwin's label.
http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/WilliamProvinePragmatics



.