Re: Dinesh D'Souza: The Failure of "Intelligent Design"
- From: AC <mightymartianca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2008 18:06:07 GMT
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:43:51 -0700 (PDT),
jspaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jspaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
The problem with evolution is not that it is unscientific but that it
is routinely taught in textbooks and in the classroom in an atheist
way. Textbooks frequently go beyond the scientific evidence to make
metaphysical claims about how evolution renders the idea of a Creator
superfluous. If I wanted to promote my book What's So Great About
Christianity I'd direct you there to find examples. (But I don't, so I
won't.) Most Christians don't care whether the eye evolved by natural
selection or whether Darwin's theories can account for macroevolution
or only microevolution. What they care about is that evolution is
being used to deny God as the creator. For those who are concerned
about this atheism masquerading as science, there is a better way.
Instead of trying to get unscientific ID theories included in the
classroom, a better strategy would be to get the unscientific atheist
propaganda out. In future blogs I'll show such a strategy can be
successfully implemented.
How about actually justifying the claim first.
--
Aaron Clausen mightymartianca@xxxxxxxxx
fnor
.
- References:
- Dinesh D'Souza: The Failure of "Intelligent Design"
- From: jspaceman
- Dinesh D'Souza: The Failure of "Intelligent Design"
- Prev by Date: Re: Are all Westen Europeans cousins?
- Next by Date: Re: Dinesh D'Souza: The Failure of "Intelligent Design"
- Previous by thread: Dinesh D'Souza: The Failure of "Intelligent Design"
- Next by thread: Re: Dinesh D'Souza: The Failure of "Intelligent Design"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|