Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- From: Kermit <unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 18, 12:49 pm, Rupert Morrish <rup...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nashton wrote:
jspace...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From the article:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, March 17, 2008 8:14 AM PDT
By Tyler S. Ramey / for The Daily News
Cathy Zimmerman framed her issue well in "War on science must
end" (Feb. 17 column). Her premise surely resonated with others
convinced that the current tension within science has its source in
those darn anti-Darwinists. At least she got that right.
Like it or not, Darwinism is a social and scientific brainwash. Some
proof of this lies with those rolling their eyes or laughing at such a
statement, all without ever having examined the absence of evidence
for the theory or more plausible explanations regarding origins.
Darwinism only passes as purely scientific among those who believe in
a purposeless and philosophically material universe; this describes
those of the scientific organizations Zimmerman cites as the final
authorities on what qualifies as science.
The logical -- purely logical -- basis of Darwinian evolution fails in
so many ways that critical thinkers are left mystified about the
reasoning ability of those who hold to it. One need not be a believer
in the supernatural, i.e., God, to recognize Darwinism's
insurmountable problems, not the least of which is its mathematical
impossibility based on the law of small probability. Sadly, evidence
involving numbers won't convince scores of innumerate citizens (the
numbers equivalent to "illiterate") who believe they have a real
chance at winning the lottery But statistical evidence aside, modern
cosmology presents enough philosophical and scientific problems for
Darwinism, but that's another letter.
There are hundreds and hundreds of scientists, Ph.Ds and MDs --
probably not those "respected" ones Zimmerman refers to -- who are
intellectually honest about where scientific discovery is leading, and
it's not closer to Darwin ... that's just a fact. Many of these
scientists and medical doctors and researchers have been expelled from
academia because they dared question the Darwinian paradigm. So much
for academic freedom and the open market of ideas.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read it at
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2008/03/18/readers/doc47de8ab704945721443...
J. Spaceman
It's those evil dentists that arouse suspicion. Beware!
Dentists aren't evil (at least not all of them),
Some folks beg to differ:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On3mrKW-Nk0
they're just not
inherently qualified to speak on microbiology or evolution. People who
claim they are should arouse suspicion.
-----------------www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
Kermit
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- From: macaddicted
- Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- References:
- Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- From: jspaceman
- Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- From: Nashton
- Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- From: Rupert Morrish
- Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- Prev by Date: Re: the nazis banned darwin and upheld christian literature
- Next by Date: Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- Previous by thread: Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- Next by thread: Re: Commentary: Microbiological advances point away from Darwin
- Index(es):
Loading