Re: And the winner is *** Post of the Month for November 2006 ***

On Mar 16, 5:59 pm, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 16, 11:08 am, Friar Broccoli <Elia...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

(4) From: Mark Isaak (17 Nov 2006)
Design as an evolutionary process that includes chance,
selection, and compromise.http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/a07f2fed4dd7c1c4news:...

Note that I got 9 votes for this and 9 for all others.
I had no votes by private email. Feel free to double check
my count.

I will be a bit slow getting these things up since I need to take
some time figuring out how to automate the process.

Thanks to all those who voted.

Does not the Creationist-ID response get posted with the winner?

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/ea362a19adb124f9

As already noted, I could not make such a decision on my own,
even were I so inclined, and as you may suspect I am not at all
so inclined, even though I very much appreciate your
participation in the votes.

Just for fun, I will also note a second problem: you refer to "*the*
Creationist-ID response". As I am sure you are aware, there is
no such thing as THE C-ID position. There are almost as many
creationist positions as there are creationists.

We evolutionists on the other hand stick pretty closely to the
official party line, because (I suggest) that line is constrained by
observational evidence. The reason (I suggest) that there are
so many C-ID positions, is that you folks are largely unconstrained
by much of anything, and so can (and do) just make stuff up.

Given that scripture can reasonably be interpreted in many different
ways, I hope you will begin considering the possibility that it can be
read in a way that is consistent with the other observational
evidence that God has left us. This is essentially the same position
that Augustine and Aquinas (via VBM) are urging on you.

Cordially;

Friar Broccoli
Robert Keith Elias, Quebec, Canada Email: EliasRK (of) gmail * com
Best programmer's & all purpose text editor: http://www.semware.com

--------- I consider ALL arguments in support of my views ---------

.