Re: Re: Incredible creatures that defy evolution

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:56:20 -0300, Nashton <nana@xxxxx> enriched this
group when s/he wrote:

To proclaim with certainty that God had nothing to do with, given our
current state of knowledge and the embryonic state of science today, is
silly.

Rubbish. Gods are the invention of man, we can therefore state with
100% certainty that your fictional god had nothing whatsoever to do
with creation.

--
Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bad Archaeology
    ... the bottom yet. ... Jean Aule is only dismissed as rubbish when those books are claimed to be ... based on the science of the time. ... her forays into invention and domestication much better had the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Bad Archaeology
    ... the bottom yet. ... Jean Aule is only dismissed as rubbish when those books are claimed to be ... based on the science of the time. ... her forays into invention and domestication much better had the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Re: ToE
    ... Gods are the invention of primative man. ... In science, the proposition must, in principle, be capable of being ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled"
    ... I do think that the "evolution = atheism" false dichotomy is ... until any of them are shown to be accurate by science. ... then claiming gods exist is nothing ... All lightning strikes may be natural, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: So much for "teach the controversy", an antidote for "Expelled"
    ... I do think that the "evolution = atheism" false dichotomy is ... until any of them are shown to be accurate by science. ... then claiming gods exist is nothing ... You're being intellectually dishonest. ...
    (talk.origins)