Re: PZ Myers on Evolution without Natural Selection

On Mar 11, 6:04 am, backspace <sawireless2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 10, 4:09 pm, wf3h <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

?? doesn't matter what darwin's intent was. einstein invented
relativity but he never conceived of 'space-time' as a 4th dimension
even though it follows from his theory

you seem to think a scientist who invents a theory has to conceive of
ALL the ramifications of that theory

And what was Darwin's theory ? I can' t find it on Wikipedia,

what is 'god'? i can't find it in wikipedia.

would
you be so kind as to create a scratchpad.wikia.com entry

would you be so kind as to tell me how creationism solves the origins
problem? saying 'god did it' leaves undefined the very concept of god
as creator.

and in your
own words state the formally established "theory" of Darwin. He used
ToNS 36 times and ToE twice yet he never actually gave the formal
definition. As on reviewer put it "... it was one long argument..."
Sure so did Kepler but Kepler gave us the conclusion , Darwin never
came to any formally established conclusion and the failure to
understand this is why we are in this language terrorism mess we find
ourselves in
with everybody using natural selection but nobody knows what is the
theory of natural selection - formally defined that is.

saying 'god created' to me, as a scientist, is a meaningless phrase.
the bible seems filled with these. proof of that is the fact that 'god
did it' stymied progress in the western world for 1500 years. science
went nowhere

i'm really interested in getting help from creationists. how does 'god
did it' tell me anything testable as a scientist? why did this idea
fail for 1500 years? why does no scientist use this idea? why can't i
find it in 'wikipedia'? why can't i find reference to 'god' in ANY
scientific papers

i really want your help. perhaps you can tell us what no creationist
has mananged to do.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Juggling on LSD anyone?
    ... because of LSD that one cannot learn otherwise? ... this sentence I found at the Wikipedia: ... God resides inside each and every person, ... Let's look at the wikipedia page for sex ...
    (rec.juggling)
  • Re: Why?
    ... And how's this for a specialist group? ... "The method is a gift from God". ...
    (uk.rec.sheds)
  • Re: Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter
    ... > You can't have much of an IQ when you believe net lies and false light ... > Wikipedia is garbage. ... is man only a blunder of God, or God only a blunder of man? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A witness from a window salesman
    ... > Sadly it appears that wikipedia has once again shown that it isnt as ... > Of course the definition of "god" may vary. ... But since they worship ... Do you believe that it is OK for one Christian to ask another to pray for them? ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: Theodicy...was Justification apologies for a new thread
    ... "Why do nasty things happen supposing that God is powerful and good?". ... powerful to create a Universe, but that does not imply that every Universe ... which requires some suffering" to "Natural selection ... Yes, some of it arises from the laws of physics, so we should also be ...
    (uk.religion.christian)