Re: Dana Tweedy is a Clown

On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:16:52 -0800 (PST), Ray Martinez
<pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 26, 4:45 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ray Martinez" <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:670eb215-79cb-4e42-b170-0dcc94f9199d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Feb 22, 5:33 pm, j.wilki...@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins) wrote:

snip



Pure damage control.

What sort of "damage" is there to control?



This is why "Dr" Wilkins is not a real scholar, much less an
intellect; he cannot be trusted to tell the truth even when that truth
is readily available for anyone to verify for them self. Wilkins is
simply some guy who passed classes and was awarded a "degree" on this
basis alone.

Jealousy is an ugly emotion, Ray.



I too have read Stenger's book and it most clearly condemns Theism to
not have any scientific evidence to justify its existence.

Stenger is correct.


Imagine that; Dana the "Christian" agrees with Stenger the Atheist
that Theism has no scientific evidence to justify its existence?

It doesn't. Ever heard of "faith", Ray? It's something that theists
(besides you) seem to understand is the basis of their theism.

Comparable to an Atheist agreeing with a Theist that Atheism has no
evidence to justify its existence.

Atheism exists *because* of the lack of evidence to support theism. It
needs no supporting evidence, as it is not a claim, simply the reply
"I don't believe you" to the claims of theists.

Of course Dana Tweedy is a "double agent" because no real Christian
would say what he said.

That's a bonnie kilt yer wearin', laddie! What whisky will ye be
havin' with yer haggis today?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dana Tweedy is a Clown
    ... he cannot be trusted to tell the truth even when that truth ... not have any scientific evidence to justify its existence. ... "I don't believe you" to the claims of theists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Handmaiden to History
    ... working disciplines, interrelate to each other and to the period in question? ... Knowledge consists only of knowing the evidence and the theories regarding the evidence. ... They cannot imagine how the Jews could have come to exist if there were not some truth in the OT. ... There is no reason whatsoever to suppose the Jews did not suddenly come into existence with their book also. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Dana Tweedy is a Clown
    ... he cannot be trusted to tell the truth even when that truth ... not have any scientific evidence to justify its existence. ... seem to understand is the basis of their theism. ... "I don't believe you" to the claims of theists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dana Tweedy is a Clown
    ... he cannot be trusted to tell the truth even when that truth ... not have any scientific evidence to justify its existence. ... seem to understand is the basis of their theism. ... "I don't believe you" to the claims of theists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: Dana Tweedy is a Clown
    ... he cannot be trusted to tell the truth even when that truth ... not have any scientific evidence to justify its existence. ... seem to understand is the basis of their theism. ... "I don't believe you" to the claims of theists. ...
    (talk.origins)