Re: Nashton evading killfiles *yet again*...

On Mar 3, 11:26 am, Chris Thompson <cthomp...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Nashton <n...@xxxxx> wrote innews:fqgpqa$u7a$1@xxxxxxxx:



Chris Thompson wrote:
Nashton <n...@xxxxx> wrote innews:fqbg6i$64t$1@xxxxxxxx:

Chris Thompson wrote:
Nashton <n...@xxxxx> wrote innews:fqah9k$a0i$1@xxxxxxxx:

AC wrote:ottled
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:33:25 GMT,
Ye Old One <use...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:18:01 -0500, "J.J. O'Shea"
<try.not...@xxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:21:54 -0500, Mr D. wrote
(in article <SDMxj.2456$PM6....@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):

Troll.

<re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-replonk>

M.

Actually, no he's _not evading killfiles. At least not for the
last 35 days. That's it, you're plonked.

God _damn_ but you're an idiot.
Calling NashtOff an idiot is insulting idiots.
No, it's called repeating yourself.

(With a nod to the immortal genius of Sam Clemens).

Whoa! All this bottled up hostility. It's actually quite
appalling. Shame on you all and get a life.

What makes you think it's bottled-up?

Chris

I certainly hope you don't go around displaying this kind of
hostility towards others in your daily lives.

Well, Nashton, I am not sure where you think the hostility was in my
post. It was, after all, a simple question. I think you are having
some persecution issues, to be honest, but that's not too unusual for
the religious.

LOL

And then I'm the one that's paranoid.

Well, it looks like you need to do a little reading to distinguish
between paranoia and persecution complexes.



I ought to have wrote: I hope this
isn't bottled up hostility that you're displaying, but merely trying
to show off in the presence of your peers and heaven forbid, not
follow the party line that prevails in this hell hole of Usenet.

Well, now that's a funny thing isn't it? I have no need to show off
at all. But as I recall, you were the one making odd and misleading
statements about education, qualifications, publications, when you
burst on the t.o. scene a while back.

Right. Just keep the vitriol coming. Hopefully, it's not your only
talent;)

Vitriol? Where? Have you forgotten how you kept insisting you were a
scientist, only to finally admit you were nothing of the sort? It's not
vitriol to remember things as they actually happened. You need to check
out the definition of that word- there are lots of free online
dictionaries that can help you.



Better now?

How do you feel about personal accountability? Look to your own
posts.

LOL

Of course you think personal accountability is a joke. Why am I not
surprised?

Chris

I am a systems administrator, not a scientist, but I have never
claimed that I am *therefore more qualified to discuss biology than a
biologist. IIRC, Nicola/Nicolas was, after finally admitting that he
was a physical therapist, still claiming to be more trained in science
and methodology than our resident evolutionary scientists are.

His recent posts are more civilized than they were a year or two ago,
but he is still offering no refuting evidence or other troublesome
observations for evolutionary science. Asserting that atheism is old-
fashioned is no more troubling to evolutionary science than it is to
meteorology or neuroanatomy. Or for that matter, to atheists.

<shrug>

Kermit

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Galilean transformation equations
    ... able to see how scientists think and what the problem is with ... to be the one that comes up with crazy ideas.. ... doesn't have anything to do with responding to your posts. ... mathematics and psychology and your dissatisfaction about how your tax ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation equations
    ... able to see how scientists think and what the problem is with ... doesn't have anything to do with responding to your posts. ... Robert B. Winn ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: time dilation
    ... canceling your posts, ... Scientists do this because they find it amusing among themselves. ... change the text of the original post. ... It turned out that facts ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Orthodoxys Opposition to Theories of Superluminality
    ... >> Sure I'd read the other posts. ... radiation, electron tunneling speeds, orbital dynamics, etc.) ... > It's not exactly unheard of for scientists to found companies, ... >> Physicists make up words that they are opposed to all the time. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Commentary: Darwinists go ape over new education bill
    ... accurately characterize why you are wrong, and your failure to address ... occasional mistake in detail casts doubt on the pattern of the whole. ... analysis of evolutionary science. ... actual scientists have no problem with the overall pattern of ...
    (talk.origins)